>Dont mind us just launching a whole new defi protocol alongside our main product
parsiq.medium.com
My body is ready for those sweet passive gains while I wait for this thing to go to 10$
>Dont mind us just launching a whole new defi protocol alongside our main product
parsiq.medium.com
My body is ready for those sweet passive gains while I wait for this thing to go to 10$
Other urls found in this thread:
yeah hopefully this stops the price from just tanking. Super frustrating
Every customer has to market buy or borrow PRQ from holders if they want to use the service. It doesn't get much better than that.
This is accumulation phase user. Right now the token doesnt have much usage, so its nothing but an investors speculation with strong ups and downs.
But they are preparing to integrate their token into all of their services. When all that shit is good to go, you're going to wish you bought more
i've got a decently comfy stack. I have 58000, so I think I'll make it.
Sell at 10 vs staking and lending.
What should I do anons. 50k stack.
The next chainlink in making. Parsiq is undervalued gem
Stake and lend until it hits 10$? Duh.
Or I mean if the interest rates are high enough at 10$ enjoy living off passive gains
Keep buying as long as you can stomach the price, lend and use the profits to find another project early and do the same again.
I wonder if this will be integrated on Coinmetro, without the need to move them into your own wallet
Probably not, this is kind of a stand-alone defi protocol, that other tokens can also use for lending/borrowing. They made it for PRQ but its a different product
I wonder if this doesn't delist it from CM, as it would make PRQ a security rather than a utility
>PRQ being 3 years late again
k
Token not needed scamcoin
found this on CM telegram, but no official source
Thats nice for CM users. Suppose its no big deal for Parsiq to integrate it into the exchange since theyre working together closely
Don't buy it. Go lose your money on the latest .finance.
Should I yolo my entire stack into it?
Bryan is as close to an official source as you can get without it being a direct employee.
Sure. Go lose your money when the start selling direct to businesses without the useless token and 'hodlium'.
lol direct b2b fiat is actually hodlium under the hood dumb dumb :^)
How much more are you trying to buy?
Shame you don't understand that a useless TOKEN is not shared in a company. Parsiq will give you nothing.
100K TOKEN NOT NEEDED
*shares
Good thing the team is planning to integrate the token into everything Parsiq does then innit mate
The auditor of the iqprotocol is andre cronje, you heard it here first.
Kek I hope not, watch from this timestamp
Stop making threads about this piece of shit coupon token fucking russian scam
Mate you're in the wrong thread this is not a Chainlink thread
Uh-huh. Until they decided they can do perfectly well without their useless token. This will be Lition 2.0, just wait
At least Chainlink has an actual product, not just partnerships with scam defi and a scam exchange - that repaid them by 'losing' millions of tokens
>Until they decided they can do perfectly well without their useless token.
They were already doing fine without the token, look at their website now all the payment plans are in fiat, yet they are choosing to integrate the token and make all users hold or borrow PRQ to use the product. Why go through all that lenght if they are doing fine with just fiat?
Now stop with your obvious FUDing, you had 4 months to accumulate, hurry your ass up before you want to rope
To all trolls who think parsiq is a scam coin...either you want to fud to buy in cheap or you just dumb as hell. Parsiq is going to to blast the roof of any coin within 6 months. Starting with the sock of news end of december 2020. Stupid lamer trolls do not know anything of what parsiq is going to do for the entire blockchain services available.
That fucking smirk as saying yeah we are already on the moon fucking moron just buy.
Yes, temporary promises to prop up the price whilst they dump useless PRQ tokens. Straight out of the LIT playbook.
Go on then, explain it. Without meme phrases like 'reverse Chainlink '. Bonus points if you can articulate why it needs a token at all.
Link did not need the token at all too fucking moron.
They implemented and affirmed the token would be used mid 2019.
>Temporary promises to dump the token
Haha is this the best you have