The Graph TGE

Imagine thinking Zig Forums will determine the launch behaviour of GRT and that we need to "keep muh secret" so Zig Forums doesn't pump the price.
I think you're too used to shitcoins with $20k volume, and pathologically lying to other Zig Forumstards, user.

Why do you think none of the big twitter accounts have been shilling this???
Because none of them have their bags filled yet.

Even now too many people already know about this.

We don't need any more competition on opening day.

SHUT THE FUCK UP, ALL OF YOU, UNTIL AFTER TRADING STARTS AND WE HAVE OUR BAGS FILLED. Then we can openly talk about it.

IT'S NOT HARD.

ZIP. IT.

Attached: 23f2f.jpg (600x439, 23.49K)

There was a time when Zig Forums talked about good projects when people weren't just desperately trying to dump on each other's heads. I see pre-launch Graph discussion as proof that that sentiment is still alive, which means Zig Forums is still alive.

I don't know what you're grousing about user. The tokenomics are shit anyway, you'll have 2 years to properly load on your bags before we'll see any significant action

AVAX tokenomics were shit also. Doesnt change the fact that it still opened 10x and probably never get backs to ICO price

Yeah that's not even a question. It will open and stay well above the ICO price, but regardless, I'm having some doubts on my bag loading strategy onward with the inflation happening within the next two years. I will probably be loading them within the next 8 months and then slowly offload till the cycle passes

>subgraph signalling rewarded on a bonding curve
>the tokenomics are shit
pick one

What’s your price prediction for the first 6 months? I think only at 6 months the dilution is big, so dump before that and buy back in the dump

Two answers to that:
1) Everyone knows about the token unlock schedule, so if you're looking to sell "just before" then you're not beating the market
2) You're assuming VCs are going to market dump one of the best holds in the entire space, and not use their GRT as they are intended, to signal and earn even more.

So give me a price prediction? Im curious

Price predictions are for brainlets, user, you need to move past that.

I can't put my finger on a certain price, but I'm looking at a 12 month mark to see where the overall market might be then. I won't really mind the 6 month unlock period because if the price dumps then it just means I'll be able to scoop more. However, the crypto market will bloom and taking the top 100 coins with it, which is why I'm not too bothered with fluctuations.

Let me point a flaw
>subgraph signalling rewarded on a bonding curve
>You're assuming VCs are going to market dump one of the best holds in the entire space, and not use their GRT as they are intended, to signal and earn even more.
These corporate actors have significantly more interest in being the first when it comes to evaluating and signalling. Which is why I will never be able to get in so early before these whales enter the boding curve, which just dilutes my profits. These guys are already sifting through subgraphs and will probably deploy their own perfected versions. If any new ones outside their domain appear, they will have custom scripts to enter as soon as possible. No way to beat that, especially considering you can slash your initial like that. Much safer and prudent to be a delegator than a curator

That's largely accurate, but also taking a very short view of things. Yes, we will almost definitely not be able to beat entities like Framework into the best subgraphs, but think of it this way: If The Graph is around for 20 years, indexing a mature global smart contract economy that moves quadrillions around, then EVERYONE who gets in in the first year, and signals intelligently, will make it many times over.
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

Attached: B30675B2-C771-47BE-8BF8-7CB807D2E7B9.png (1037x1159, 618.09K)

I agree, it essentially boils down to the question of what kind of timeframe you're looking at. You're looking at the longterm and I would argue it's probably the safest and most profitable course of action because the amount of money that will flow into Graph will compensate for any curating shortcomings I mentioned earlier. I also think you're spot on the scope of the value Graph is going to command in just a few years. However, in my investments, I consider the market conditions and I try to take advantage of them. We will most likely have a 2017-tier bull market within the next 12 months and there's no reason to sell some off and buy in a few months later. Granted, I could very well burn myself with this strategy if this project makes a leap forward and the price follows. I also don't consider myself technical enough to properly evaluate subgraphs and to pinpoint exact subindustry mania happening in crypto every year in a timely fashion, which is why I don't feel comfortable putting anything into any bonding curve. I guess it all boils down to your personality and risk preference. If I were asked on what someone should do to maximize profit I'd probably advise your strategy while I always end up trying to swing it, but I also burn myself every now and then

So just be a delegator is the safest play for non technical investors?

You could try to nail it based on where the hype is, but you lose 10% when you unstake, not sure if I remember that part correctly. Delegator is non-risk way to earn a passive income, but it's less than what you could get through curation.

Not to mention that you're exposed to price fluctuations in the meantime. This project has great potential to be sure, especially with the big names so far, but it's not a 100% certainty at this point yet that this is going to be The Indexing protocol for blockchain. We'll probably know for sure next year.

Looking for 1-3$ within the first month

>VC fud
>"Too much ROI" fud

Graph is insanely bullish lmao

What are the other indexing protocols?