Staking is the only value proposition for LINK. 4 billion MC on the speculation that one day you will be able to stake your LINK.
Why hasn't staking been implemented in 3 years? Shouldn't this be the top priority when it's the only thing that would give LINK any value?
Why haven't we seen any design docs or blog posts about how staking should be implemented in such a context, where you are aggregating data points? Why hasn't the team even hinted at how such a thing should be engineered?
job one is to grow the network that will eventually use the staking. with out the network the staking is pointless.
Brayden Kelly
I don’t know anything about chainlink, but I 100% agree.
Connor Brown
Why would it be pointless? What secures the network presently?
Robert Walker
The tokens given free to the startup nodes which fudders claim is sergey cashing out
Elijah Ward
How do nodes getting gibs secure the network?
Juan Flores
This.
Imagine the stock market if no companies existed.
Michael Edwards
I stake right now
Robert Kelly
>Why hasn't staking been implemented in 3 years? You need a firm grasp of how decentralized networks are built and how trust systems operate on top of cryptographic knowledge to even begin to understand how complex this problem is.
