Snowden shilling BTC

Snowden is a BIZ oldfag

twitter.com/snowden/status/1187892280906137602

Attached: 1606090410446.png (1512x1000, 296.8K)

>this is a troll right?

No just a boomer retard.

block increase for the first blockchain is the biggest attack vector.

All other coins can increase blocksize but allowing it in btc is a massive attack vector having bitcoin become the reserve currency for the other cryptos is good enough.

It does not has to be a global currency, just bretton woods bancor on steroids.

Attached: 1555245340432.jpg (400x400, 87.29K)

That's the name of the video game character in his avatar. No woman is gonna say some stupid shit about the great reset, that's too autistic.

Tricked by the trannies again.
Gotta stop falling for it

Not scaling is a bigger attack vector for TPTB to take advantage of. Makes the blockchain meaningless and then the whole thing will crumble in on itself eventually. When everyone's BTC is stored on centralized services, then welcome to fractional reserve banking 2.0, where the supply can be made up and the blockchain abandoned.

If there was some scaling plan, then everyone would still be using the blockchain for their transactions, making it harder to change course from decentralization.

There is no in between for bitcoin. It's either taking over the world or worthless.

Making blocks bigger isn't scaling. lnmarkets.com

>Scaling isn't scaling

-Sent from my 512gb iPhone which would have been 16gb a few years ago. But that's not scaling either.

And lightning is not bitcoin. It's a failed layer 2 project that depends on the scaling of layer 1 to work properly.

Snowden has been on bitcoin for years. Bullish.

>opinion of a woman
Women's legitimacy lies only in knowing how to keep a house in good order, prepare good nutritious meals and take care of babies. This is their natural role, everything else is unnatural and therefore deeply anti-social.

This

>But that's not scaling either.
No. The word has specific meaning in this context, meaning which you have no grasp on yet act like you're an expert. Have you ever scaled a software system? There are specialists that exclusively focus on scaling and if they just 10x the load a project can handle they didn't do their job, the project still doesn't scale.

Bitcoin enables money laundering, human trafficking and requires 7 nuclear power plants to sustain.

>Have you ever scaled a software system?
Yes and it involves increasing variables that have become bottlenecks, among other things.

>Bitcoin enables money laundering, human trafficking and requires 7 nuclear power plants to sustain.

Now this is glowing

Attached: 1604364059687.png (490x430, 15.61K)

You know what else is glowing? All the miners around the world that generate more heat than the sun itself

HAHAHA They're so desperate for people to pile in before the cyber pandemic

You're a liar, you never scaled anything. Either the system scales or it doesn't. A 10x increase is just a 10x increase. The demand for transactions is infinite so the only thing a 10x tps increase accomplishes is a few months of cheaper transactions that creates an expectation from clients that ends up not being fulfilled and compromises security. This has all been tested thoroughly, it's not a debate but reality as objectively tested. It was a debate in 2012 before the results were in but not anymore.
My local miners are creating economic output that would otherwise be wasted. The water flow the hydro plants are using still flows either way, thanks to miners more water goes through the turbines and that energy secures the worlds financial system.
Snowden is probably a limited hangout. These could still be his personal opinions or perhaps the glowniggers like BTC now.

No you are just driving the price of electricity up with your inefficient and slow blockchain. If hydro plants produced so much why did china pull the plug on miners? Why didn't the chinese government start mining bitcoin if it's so profitable and good for the system? They have a lot of dams so electricity shouldn't be a problem

I know my economic situation not why China does what it does. I can't transport my excess energy to consumers but I have enough to run several small countries. The most popular option so far has been using the energy to smelt aluminum which requires huge industrial plants with associated pollution.
Inefficient energy producers can't compete in mining with areas that have excess green energy.

So if the blocksize was 500 bytes and we could only fit 1 transaction in a block, would you still see no reason to scale? What makes 1mb the perfect number to you?

>A 10x increase is just a 10x increase.

Uh yeah. Increased throughput is scaling. What are you getting at? It compounds with other scaling efforts. It's not the only solution, but it is a necessary one.

>compromises security

Nope. It increases the network effect and gives a reason for people and businesses using the network to run a node.

>This has all been tested thoroughly

As far as I'm aware, the only chains that have tested scaling in production environments are BCH and BSV. Link me to these BTC tests where they tried scaling on chain with thousands of nodes.

I always thought that Snowden was a CIA asset and part of a struggle for control with the NSA
So does this mean the CIA secretly helped develop bitcoin? Or it's just his own opinion? I don't know any more
Still buying bitcoin

Attached: 1602917487334.jpg (800x450, 61.22K)

How long till Snowden tweets: "one word: Chainlink"?