IT CAN'T FUCKING SCALE. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO SAY THIS?!?!
ETH is pure spaghetti code. ETH was without a doubt a great idea; I will not deny that at all. However, most people in crypto don't have the comprehension or knowledge to be able and look at the code-base and identify flaws that could be catastrophic, both in terms of economic, security, and overall functioning in cost signals.
Vitalik is smart. However, he's the most retarded smart person in all of crypto. He's a fucking child who doesn't own up to his inability to produce a creation and has longevity. Him and his cronies wrote shitty-ass code. It can't scale. The only way it can scale is constant upgrades each time they feel things are getting congested. This is where the problem lies. It is impossible for ETH to implement a scaling solution to where it doesn't need upgrades anymore. For ETH to work, it will need constant upgrades of ETH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, so on and so forth for an indefinite amount of time - just kicking the can down the road. Off-chain scaling won't work either because ETH's security is already shit on a stick. Making something more complicated that is already a piece of shit is 100% pointless. People can never steadily develop something on ETH because with each 'scaling upgrade', those who are creating on ETH will have to pivot each time to ensure their product is compatible to work on ETH. To sum it up, each time ETH decides to upgrade to scale, it just gets worse.
For ETH to work to the level needed, the amount of ETH in ever single wallet needs to be known after each transaction. Since ETH cannot implement SPV, it's impossible for ETH to scale because it does not have the capabilities to know the exact amount of ETH in every single ETH wallet after each transaction at a massive scale.
The only way to permanently fix ETH would be to roll back the chain to the beginning almost. Vitalik is just your average Russian retard who can't produce anything of value.
Eth 2.0 exists in name only and nothing would suggest its going to be fully implemented within the next 4-5 years if ever.
Michael Fisher
Nice copy pasta.
James Wilson
The reason Cardano is there. By the way, Cardano will eat BTC too. Only a question of time.
Jack Kelly
le ebin pasta king
Bentley Collins
MuH sPaGheTti CoDe, whoever made this pasta is salty they're not holding
Austin White
Oh for fuck sake.. Your nigger ass again. I wonder if your fuding to suppress the price so you can pick up cheap ETH or you have an IQ of room temp. Either way nigger, the ETH train is heading to the moon whether you like it or not.
Jose Turner
short ETH long ADA, you've been warned.
Ryder Torres
Thanks OP. Have a seat with the CME gap anons over there please.
Ethereum cannot scale thats a fact. The ETH 2.0 roll out is protracted and convoluted, not too mention that the technology they are working on is inferior and antiquated in comparison to Cardano. There is an atmosphere of ambiguity as to when the Ethereum development team will release a fully working product. If ETH 2.0 launches too early there will be without a doubt a series of disastrous catastrophic errors and bugs that will severally impact the confidence of users and investors. If they release ETH 2.0 too late they are going be left behind. Cardano has already developed a superior network that's orders of magnitude more technologically advanced than Ethereum 2.0. The ETH development team are working on an insurmountable task. Personally my own experience of using Ethereum has been overall a negative one, where the majority of the time I have to pay exorbitant amounts of money in gas fees only for my transactions to get stuck pending for one hour. If people that are technologically literate hate using Ethereum what will normies think of it when they clog the network trying to trade imaginary cats.
Oliver Morris
>“ETH is destroying my shitcoin and my kid’s college fund, buy my bags”
listen - I don't want anons here to lose money. So let me ask you this one question: What is the point of Ethereum?
This is very funny and I laugh at the unquestioning vapidity of people who say "smart contract" and just let other people fill in the details as to what that should mean and what the value should be. The mistake here is that "smart" is a misnomer. A contract, as we have known them for many hundreds of years, is already smart because it can often require the work of a solicitor or barrister to argue for or against the individual clauses of a contract; contract wording requires interpretation and that can require some of the highest order thinking. It is therefore smart.
A contract on Ethereum, then, isn't smart. It is a dumb contract. It is dumb in the sense that it executes itself, whether it has been audited and validated or not. And for that reason, you get fraud, after hack, after loss, after gimmick, after scam and essentially fuck all in-between.
And for what reason would anybody need to run computer programs in a decentralised way? What the fuck is the point? I can understand a currency being decentralised; that is completely intuitive and innovative, but running programs is useless as it is so insanely inefficient. Anything you could run on Ethereum you can run on AWS and it will be cheaper, faster and more secure, therefore resolving the trilema and revealing Ethereum to be completely and I mean COMPLETELY redundant. Just because something can work doesn't mean it has value, much like a kettle connected to a dynamo on an exercise bike would work. Ethereum is a fucking joke.
Adam Cox
the why greeny liny go up?
William Moore
you mention scaling and cp in the same op
odd
... we're not trying to sell you on cp anymore though
Carter Howard
dumb contracts are actually a much better description for them.
