Hate speech is not free speech. Prove me wrong

Hate speech is not free speech. Prove me wrong.

>inb4 all speech is free speech
What is CP, fedposting and bomb instructions? Those are considered exceptions to the first amendment, so why not this? Unless you believe in an all or nothing approach, then I don't see why hate speech should be legal.

Attached: 6a0120a610525c970c017d3c2b1cbd970c-320wi.jpg (300x450, 29.32K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bomb instructions are threats of violence. Telling you you're a disgusting sodomite is an opinion.

Hate speech is outlawed in every civilized nation except for America. Can you tell me why that is?

Brandenburg v. Ohio, faggot

every other country is trying to limit their citizens as much as possible? You do realize that dictatorships don't happen overnight, right? They're inching in closer and closer, where people won't even notice it's happening. Plus, if the people in charge want someone taken down, framing them for "hate speech" is so fucking easy.

Well, do you at least agree that certain types of speech needs to be banned?

I'm pretty sure I could buy bomb instructions at my local bookstore or Amazon. Free at the library too.
Also the Feds and Democrats and Republicans are traitors, and traitors usually get publicly executed. Our founding father gave us guns rights with the grand vision of shooting our own government officials, which they detailed elaborately.
You're right though, commies, jews, and homosexuals should probably not get the protections of citizenship.

No. Never. To say otherwise is to be unamerican.

I agree with the current provisions of the 1st amendment and nothing else. Fighting words, explicit threats, real libel/slander, etc. I wouldn't consider cp "speech," rather it is illegal media. Nobody made cp to communicate anything ever.

Anything else is an illegal power grab and should be resisted heavily.

Address his statement instead of moving the goalposts. Threats are not opinions. Like if I say you're a stupid nigger and someone ought to lynch you, that's my opinion. Most threats aren't actually illegal either, they get investigated for credibility. If I said I'm going to lynch you, nigger on this board it's not very credible vs say someone detailing their intent to do so. Nigger.

>Prove me wrong.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_in_the_United_States
The most recent Supreme Court case on the issue was in 2017, when the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no "hate speech" exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment.

dude words are just words. They can move you, they can be powerful, or they can be hurtful. But words aren't physical things and don't cause physical harm. Therefore all speech must be allowed. Unless speech causes direct harm to your physical person, or your money, or business then it must not be regulated.

You can't regulate speech because someone hurt your fefe's. fucking faggot.

They can't be reasoned with.
Realize they thought there was a global pandemic that could wipe out humanity and they actually chose to waste their last breaths talking about the virus is racist ect.

The day of the rope is seriously the only real option. They cannot be reasoned with.

Bomb instructions aren't illegal doofus.

"hate speech" is a loose term thrown around to gradually lead to tyranny. If a government said "you cant say things we dont want you to say" there would be a civil war in days, instead they say "you cant say that because its hate speech" racism homophobia etc is just a cover to impose laws that allow a government to limit what people can and cant say. Then they will broaden the defnition so X is hate speech, Y is hate speech etc untill it comes to a point where criticisng politicians in charge is concidered hate speech

>Hate speech is not free speech. Prove me wrong
Because you sound like a fag and your shit's all retarded.

Yes it is, deal with it you filthy niggerfaggot. Go live in eurabia or chinka since America's freedom hurts your asshole so much.

Hate speech does not exist

pic related. Now prove to me that hate crime laws arent unconstitutional, cruel and unusual, and racist.

Attached: Matal v. Tam.png (632x584, 392.52K)

What's a ''hate speech''?

>Hate speech is not free speech

Free speech isn't always hate speech but hate speech is always free speech. I hope that helps you understand better.

The definition of hate speech is completely arbitrary, unlike the other things you listed. Anyone can call anything hate speech. It’s a blank check to shut down any criticism of any group for any reason.

Fuck niggers and fuck kikes like you. The holocaust didnt happen, but it should have.

Ironically, calling some countries civilized and others not is considered hate speech by many on the hardcore left. Do you think you should be in jail?

Because the US are the only country with any semblance of freedom in the world. If by 'civilised' you mean 'the police can enter your house and arrest you for having different opinions on the internet', you're a moron and you should strangle yourself

Hate Crimes shouldn't exist either. It is applied against one demographic nearly 100% of the time when in fact they are the victims of the most inter racial crimes. It's a control mechanism used to proliferate guilt so people don't demand change in obvious problems.

Attached: npc_kek.jpg (1545x1613, 146.11K)

nigger

Speech becomes hate speech based on what subjectively makes people offended. It also restricts what can be said under free speech. Your attempt at restricting free speech offends most of Zig Forums. If Zig Forums implemented a speech restriction policy, you'd be the first to be censored and the debate would end there.

A crime is a crime, Hate is a feeling.
If anyone commits a crime because of hate, it's a crime. But calling it a hate crime is stupid.

Hate is a normal human emotion. You’re trying to ban a normal human emotion. By doing so, it brings about a culture of passive aggression and what is, essentially, secret societies, and eventually subverted warfare.

The US is designed differently and it’s better. Other countries are on a slow path to authoritarianism. The US can only go there if it gives up speech. There’s a reason it’s the First amendment.

CP and bomb instructions have hard definitions

"hate speech" is whatever the castrated faggots say it is, which is literally anything they want to call hate speech to get people they don't like shut down

your shitty ideas can't compete with superior ones without the censorship handycap

Attached: images.jpg (226x223, 8.43K)

There were 9 exceptions.
OP says there are 10.
1. Obscenity
2. Fighting words
3. Defamation (including libel and slander)
4. Child pornography
5. Perjury
6. Blackmail
7. Incitement to imminent lawless action
8. True threats
9. Solicitations to commit crimes

10. Stating an opinion that differs from mine.

Yes, and they are. Like threats, yelling fire in a crowded theatre, defamation.

Crying “hate speech” 99% of the time is just code for saying “I don’t wanna do the heavy lifting of understanding a position I don’t agree with.”

No you fucking nigger faggot

fuck obscenity laws

i think it should be legal to mercy kill pussies like u. One good cinderblock on the head oughtt to do it! Just mercy kill u and put ur squealing hog life to an end. It's the right thing to do