Seriously, Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on anything at all, just fucking make a deal and split it, no conflicts
Why doesn’t the United States just split in half?
I asked on reddit in several sub reddits.
Leftist didn't answer for the most part.
Those that did it was mostly insults. And the 4 or so that answered honestly said no. but mostly it was faux intellectuals trying to analyze my motivations for asking such a question.
Conclusion: Leftist are parasites. And parasites need host.
That's the point. It's literally a tv show.
i wish. they can have everything connected to mexico.
Balkanize the United States
Just shake hands with sociopathic mental lunatics who want you dead brah sheesh
To split peacefully and go your separate ways
Or not peacefully, liberals don’t believe in guns so it wouldn’t be very hard to take whatever they have
How the hell would that even work for the half of the country that doesn't give a shit about politics? Are they suddenly going to be forced to pick an ideology and move to that side of the country?
Most people go about their daily lives not pushing their political beliefs on somebody at the grocery store or work. Politics is just a bunch a drama, really. Theater more like it. Nobody's really willing to kill or die for their president or congresswoman, at least not in large enough numbers where factions can form. So no, it's just not feasible. America is just a land founded on conflict and exists amidst constant chaos.
Better yet, why don't Democrats leave if America is so bad and they hate it?
>are they just supposed to pick an ideology
Yes lol, the party brings up what the stand for and the people choose what they like. really simple.
this may lead to greater warring and factionalism in the future. the most safe course is to stay together and for urbanites to make concessions and stop treating all of america like it is NYC.
socialists want to cash in on american prosperity. It's the political equivalent of quitting your job and living off your savings. The more savings the longer it lasts.
Because the only way they can fund open borders and maintain a state is to keep the white population hostage and extract from it.
Do you think the Democrats will be happy with the tiny share of land they have?
>Muh popular vote
Look at Oregon. As a block it would vote dem but the majority of the land is red.
Even the red areas have dems in them. Hence the lighter areas.
Blue states would basically try to force all the red counties to come with them. Without this land they will be isolated from other blue blocks with no self reliance for food power or water. All resources will have to imported from their balkanized neighbor who would undoubtedly tariff the shit out of the blue areas to make up for the lost tax income.
It would be a legit war scenario.
Nah they've got Europe which is leftist as fuck. Or they can fuck off to Canada.
What we need is the balkanization of states. This was Red states can tax the resources sent to the blue population centers thus making up for lost revenue, and being able to hunt down illegals.
The most viable way of getting anywhere near achieving this is by granting states more power and decreasing federal power.
Incidentally, this is considered a conservative notion. Go figure.
It will, just watch. Not to sound like a boomer, but this is the eye of the storm for social conditions in the US. I'd be surprised it the country makes it through the next year, or fuck, a week after the election.
I’m for it. All the red states are poor af,
Cut the welfare babies from their federal teet
>Why doesn’t the United States just split in half?
It happened once before. 600k white people died
LOL you guys have among the most "same puppet, different colors" politicians in the world.
Besides this in any country you could make a split between cities and rural areas.
The very definition of Republic-an, as opposed to the Democracy-ats.
All we ever wanted was to be left the fuck alone
Because it's a rural vs. city thing.
Monroe new york is exactly why it wont work
No, it's women voting who split nations
I wish. It really is a good solution at this point. We could still agree to defend the country militarily together. Jews will never let it happen.
Nothing like trying again I guess.
The conflict IS the plan
>Seriously, Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on anything at all, just fucking make a deal and split it, no conflicts
Spot on. We are at an ideological impasse. So many folks on the "right" would love to just leave peacefully. Say, for instance, Kansas were to secede. The state that I live in is much prettier than Kansas, however, I would jump at the chance to live there with others who no longer wanted to be subject to the erosion of rights, constant idiocy of US politicians (on both sides), etc.
It's funny that the "left" makes the argument that we would be committing suicide by cutting ourselves off from US federal funds. What these folks don't understand is that many of us don't use entitlement programs, social services, etc, and we would like to live among people who can self-govern and thus don't have any use for these things as well.
Would the transition be hard? Almost certainly. Worth it? In my heart I believe so.
What about making blue states serve the interest of red states?
/thread
Just split the country in north and south and have democrats and Republicans to move to their respective zone
>blue states get all the coasts and major financial institutions
not sure why the conservatives think they'll win on this? being an under-industrialized landlocked nation has never been a recipe for success. the blue areas can just import food like they always have, brazil has taken over our orange, south america has alot of farmable land and they will be more than happy to increase their sales to america. meanwhile our current food supply system supposedly can't operate without illegal immigrants.
>Conclusion: Leftist are parasites. And parasites need host.
Yes.
To answer OP with another perspective: NEVER give up ground in politics. It is taken as a sign of weakness always, which leads to the opposing side trying a follow-up advance.
Look at gun rights. There has never been a "compromise". It is only ever people taking away gun rights when people mention the word "compromise". Then, they see that they can take away rights without giving up ground and continue on their warpath.
red states has the military
It's not that simple any more.
In the hypothetical country each would get half, eastern half/western half.
Anyone who is affiliated with those two parties is not seeing the big picture. The Modern Rome experiment failed horribly, we need to return to a monarchy or we will perish before this century is done.