Why is "slippery slope" listed as a logical fallacy when it is not?

Why is "slippery slope" listed as a logical fallacy when it is not?

Attached: 1591739804797.png (611x686, 256.61K)

because everything you said is jewspeak to pervert debate

Because people of the past were naive and believed stuff like thus could never happen,
And normally the slope is alot slower, so it would normally take decades, not mere months or years

me on the right

Is a slippery slope towards worse logical fallacies.

Let them overplay their hand so far that evil comes out of the woodwork, soon we'll know exactly which elites are doing this.

this

Notice that they are all penetrative, no fleshlight .

this

>Because people of the past were naive and believed stuff like thus could never happen,
the church condamned galileo because they KNEW if the bible was wrong on the sun revolution, it could be declared wrong on anything

they knew the slippery slope to be real

Because there's no logic to it
It Implies If thing a is done, inevitably thing b, then c, then d will happen
But they never provide the reasoning that it will.
If a group says "give us this now and we'll ask for more later" it's not a slippery slope, because you know it's going to get worse.
Not to mention it implies it'll never end, which is also against reason

You can't explain slippery slope to people who view the world through the lens of their emotions and can't grasp the concept of cause and effect.

Good post.

bros... imagine buying a dildo for your 13 year old daughter....

Trouble is, this doesn't work.

Go back 15 years and half the United States considered faggots an evil influence. Now you can literally be jailed for refusing to bake them a wedding cake and they've moved on to trannies.

Past evils become accepted, even good, after the kike media blasts out a couple years of talking points, manufacturered protests, and Netflix shows.

Normies will be encouraged to support their children's sexuality.

All opposites will be ridiculed and then gagged for spreading hate.

Just watch.

The megaphone the kikes have in culture hasn't been beaten yet by the right.

after a quick read of wikipedia:
while it's defined as a fallacy, the REASON stated for it being a fallacy proves that it's NOT a fallacy.
they assume there is a middle ground that can be reached.
this IS true.
but if you have an organization, like feminism, who are continuously working towards their goal:
then the middle ground keeps shifting towards the end of the slippery slope.
you reach a middle ground (working) and they want more, so you reach another middle ground (voting) and eventually the middle ground becomes the """end""" of the initial slippery slope (all men are evil).

in the future you will lose your kid to the state for skipping their mandated kosher bottoming session

All of those are just redpilling everyone on Jews.
Jews approve it.
Jews fund it.
What matters too is that we get specific names like Epstien, Prince Charles involved in trafficking and prostitution.

Attached: k.png (585x478, 110.46K)

what are you doing there?

Why a boy needs dildo? Onahole would enough.

which is fine because the bible is wrong on pretty much everything

if your kid isn't gay you're a racist nazi

(i'm not claiming this is definite proof for the slippery slope not being a fallacy btw. It was just based on the wikipedia explanation after all.)

Slippery Slope is not a formal fallacy.

It’s only an informal fallacy when it’s used AS the core argument in opposition to some X.

because theres no stigma for dildos but there is for onaholes, you ever wonder why

Attached: 1567755336563.png (1979x1306, 1.46M)

It isn’t a fallacy and you explained why. It’s like saying that the slope is slippery.
Clever

>It’s only an informal fallacy when it’s used AS the core argument in opposition to some X.
why

it works

why are there no onaholes there?

Stick things up your ass, goyim.

The article isn't right you know, if a teenager is sexually repressed they'll acquire a bunch of really depraved desires and will start doing dangerous shit like drinking their own piss or fucking themselves with a broomstick

is right*

It's bull shit in the mythological sense only. read the least jewed version you can understand and take it as stories of sci fi from the point of view of a relatively technologically primitive being.

*is a fallacy

Yes there is, it’s the exact same logic as the Overton window. Once you normalise something it becomes the new normal and shifts the window, so ideas that were totally insane end up more acceptable. People are generally hedonistic and these new ideas usually relate to hedonistic things so they catch on easily, become the new normal and shift the window again until there’s some sort of large-scale pushback.

if a teenager is sexually repressed he needs to step up his game instead of complaining about douches taking the girls

Nice we’re talking about the slippery slope fallacy?

Attached: 2F2B396A-100D-45DD-9959-0EA86966DBA6.jpg (1198x1254, 260.91K)

Yeah man, let's buy teens dildos.
You know masturbation doesn't need toys, right?

it started with divorce in the 70s to be honest

No they called his shit because he couldn’t prove retrograde motion or something like that. The “le church hated him because he’s epic science man” is a Reddit meme

you are delusional mate
show your dad your fleshlight see how he will react

I remember back in college (2010) I had a culture class where the prof would just give us a prompt and then let us talk/debate about it. One of the topics was homosexuality (the love is love rhetoric) and I remember stating that there was no point to it outside of pure hedonism. That that kind of sexual deviancy would lead to other things like bestiality and pedophilia to be more mainstream. I remember someone calling it a slippery slope.

Skip to today
>lgbtq
>drag kids
>Canada
>nambla
Turns out I was right.

It's only a logical fallacy if you can't prove the slope is slippery.

>>No they called his shit because he couldn’t prove retrograde motion or something like that.
dude check my flag
I am italian, we study the trial papers, we can read them

what about the toys for boys and tgirls? god forbid they show a tenga pussy masturbator thing

fucking double standard shit

Problem is that most of the time fallacies only take into account pure logic. This is perfectly fine since arguments in essence are logic condstructs but in some cases they are just observations of society. The slippery slope is one of these arguments. The slippery slope is not a purely logical argument, it is sociological one. It describes the behavior of humans living together, if you make something taboo the new normal then the next taboo thing will be on the table to become normal. This is just a pattern we see and we can argue with it, it's not purely logical as in it might not happen, but we don't base our arguments or actions on pure logic either. If that were the case we would never do shit, as Hume says, we wouldn't know if a billiard ball would move when it hit another ball.

I can say that this is a pattern that repeats throughout history. A society becomes more aceptant of deviant behaviors and goes down a degeneracy spiral until it collapses. I don't know how far the rabbit hole we need to plunge to finally say enough is enough, but it sure feels like it's going to happen soon. My breaking point was that stripper kid who blatantly sexualized himself infront of adults for money and EVERYONE was accepting of it, even his fucking mother. I never wanted to pick up a rifle and purge the cities more than that moment.

Attached: 1560244586698.jpg (1024x514, 41.62K)

criminally underrated

>This is just a pattern we see and we can argue with it, it's not purely logical as in it might not happen, but we don't base our arguments or actions on pure logic either

In a system with perfect information we could prove it is inevitable to happen.

Hari Seldon style, if you read Asimov.

Because it's "ratio-wiki" list, that has clear anti-white anti-christian bias in itself.

>he never used a magic wand
Weak

>A society becomes more aceptant of deviant behaviors and goes down a degeneracy spiral until it collapses.
I'd say the current and future technology and resource production can guarantee society from collapsing for a veeeeery long time, if not forever or until apocalypse (i.e. earth runs out of shit)

>All dildos.

>Not a single pocket pussy.

Sure, no bias at all.

It did take decades. Started in the 60s.

For the love of god, please fascist revolution now

The next step is hiring sex tutors to teach children how to explore their own bodies and break them in. You'll be accused of neglect for letting your child remain inexperienced.