nytimes.com
POL BTFO AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
You read the New York Times ?
it'll drop now that it's become another Occupy and nothing will actually ever be done about police brutality
>NYTimes
cope
Go on and cry, Hitler! Go cry to mama before the USA's BBC tears your pale ass up!
>nytimes
People seem very eager to support a group that can and will get them fired if they don't. Funny that
>New York Times
...
interesting that 25% of democratic voters support Burn, loot and murder.
>NY Times
>Poll
Anyone who doesn't give a shit about BLM obviously don't participate in fear of being called a racist.
>nytimes
>Public Opnion Rarely Moves Fast
>implying
So the right are cowards? Check.
>in the midst of cancel culture
>people are losing their jobs and livelihoods over mean tweets
>be NYT
>make poll requiring full name and address and social media profile
>"Do you support Black Lives Matter?"
>NYTimes
goes in all fields
LMAO
BUT HEY LET'S DO NOTHING
THEY ARE HAVING A BAD REPUTATION KJJJJJJJJJJJJ
it's just a temporary spike because of G. Flyod's death, but public opinion is way down now. 78% of the population supports sending the national guard to stop the riots.
their "support" is entirely artificial, sustained through large-scale mob violence and social ostracization
This won't last.
polls mean about as much as nigger's lives
does it actually require all that info? tf?
>from a sample size of 500 registered democrats, with an oversample of 499 black kangz
The average Joe is getting real tired of your shit, buster.
>so Mr. user, we are a big corporation and we have your name and personal informations. Do you support Black Lives Matter ?
> Question 1: Do you think Black Lives Matter, or are you an evil bigot we need to doxx?
>*Click*
> Sounds like support to me!
They already have it since they call you on your phone.
Funny because everyone I know hates these niggers.
Your mom and your cat don't count
The gallup was made in BLM march
Me, but the complete opposite.
Are these good people?
Except this time, the (((powers that be))) can't create chaos by injecting leftist race/genderbaiting politics to pollute the message, because it's already a part of it.
Occupy rotted from the inside out once the 1% figured out how to take out the (majority white) leadership that was driving it.
>Made up a fake poll then calls it a fact.
>(((NYT)))
When in Rome. It's one thing to virtue signal on a poll that doesn't mean shit (especially if the one giving you the poll is some leftist nigger/woman). Like 2016, what matters is how people vote when it's private.
>nytimes
>new york
>supporting blm
KEK, thats all thats left after whole city burned down i suppose
The mere presence of this poll, that nobody asked for, tells me the exact opposite is true.
>nyt
>hires some chink woman that's blatantly anti-white on twitter
>word gets out, nyt says fuck you and hires her anyway
It's pretty obvious they have an anti-white bias in everything they do.
“I only believe in statistics that I doctored myself”
― Winston S. Churchill
Also fuck Churchill
Wtf is this shit. Is this the end?