F35 crashes

TWO F35 crashes in one week, what is going on? Can the US military fight anymore?

Attached: _20200610_094245.jpg (720x1054, 108.06K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Harrier_Jump_Jet_family_losses
youtu.be/swpUZ6D6rdw?t=191
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

twocows
https:// cripplechan .se/v/res/16179.html

Attached: file.png (640x480, 408.78K)

Bump

>600 millions down the drain
are you ok america?

also dont they carry big boom stuff bellow them? doesnt it go kaboom when they crash?

arent these things supposed to carry nukes too? imagine putting a nuke undercarriage on something that cant even land without breaking lol

Current murkan airforce consists mostly of f-16 and f18, planes from 80ies
So when western faggots try to accuse our military of being stuck in 80ies i can only laugh

at least they didnt go full retard with the old ones, the f35 costs TEN TIMES MORE per unit

>doesnt it go kaboom when they crash?
I'm quite sure they're designed to not explode unless armed.

I'm so glad the West is completely dependent on air superiority..

No, they’re designed to go boom when the triggered is pulled. There’s was a big boomba that fell out of a plane and landed in South Carolina (iirc, idk someone will probably correct me) and it just crashed and laid dormant irradiating the area for a while

It's kinda funny how you can read Red Storm Rising today and barely anything changed at all for military hardware
Backfires are 100% based though

Attached: Russian_Air_Force_Tupolev_Tu-22M3_taking_off_at_Shaikovka.jpg (1500x1125, 420.85K)

>I'm quite sure they're designed to not explode unless armed.
dont nukes go off if something its the core too hard lol?
>semi stable core surrounded by chemical explosives, what could possibly go wrong in a crash when it will be doused in jet fuel?

>No, they’re designed to go boom when the triggered is pulled.
yeah ok but again PLANE CRASH bro

I dont think I know of any explosive that can stay inert in the middle of a plane crash, the property that MAXES THEM explosives has a tendency to make them go off when they re set on fire

Accidents are factored into Air Force budgets
What, you think that aviation is a 100% safe mode of transportation? Sure it's a lot more regulated than a car but literally nothing is immune to Murphy's Law

This is why USAF has maintainers and shit, it might be scraped up and cost a shit ton but it's a new and expensive platform, there are probably thousands of USAF accidents that you never hear about because it's literally just a part of aviation you dummy

Attached: aviation.png (1280x965, 133.92K)

>the F35 flying lemon
the hits keep on coming for this flying toilet.
But at least the blacks get to see whites bowing down to them in the streets

Isn't this the second or third time the landing gear in this piece of shit failed?

>5% of our 300 million dollar planes crash on landing, trust me though this is good

Attached: source.gif (500x290, 1.44M)

Elgin again

Haha

>Implying
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Harrier_Jump_Jet_family_losses
It literally happens with all new jets, retard

Nukes won't just blow up even if you treat them extremely harshly.
They are not even armed unless some really high (low?) DEFCON happens so worse you can get is broken nuke and some haz-mat cleanup over the crash area.
Also the 'stealth' part requires minimizing shit hanging out so most of it it's it's inside.

this is what happens when you use chinese tools

Amerimutt planes are a fucking joke. A single Eurofighter Typhoon or Su-57 could BTFO 10 Amerimutt F-35s or F-22s that crash themselves

The Whore of Babylon named Am*rica has fallen.

Attached: 1590227854627.png (403x362, 100.04K)

inexperienced pilots combined with a new Generation of fighter jets, what could go wrong?

It takes some time to fix all the small issues

>dont nukes go off if something its the core too hard lol?
No.
Closest to that was gun type (small part of the core was 'shot' inside big part of the core with hole, reaching critical mass - see Hiroshma bomb)

affirmative action

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Harrier_Jump_Jet_family_losses
>costs 5 million dollars

>Nukes won't just blow up even if you treat them extremely harshly.
nukes WILL go off if the chemical explosives goes off, even non perfectly, and I dont trust any chemical explosive not to go off when crashed at 200kmh against concrete and its own metal shell while doused in flaming kerosene

>Also the 'stealth' part requires minimizing shit hanging out so most of it it's it's inside.
is stealth even real lmao
I feel like whatever advantaged is gained by stealth will be lost when neural networks start analysing radar data

also does that mean that all the payload of the f35 is inside it? how shitty is this plane?? also not that it would make a difference in a fucking PLANE CRASH

(plane crash for reference)
youtu.be/swpUZ6D6rdw?t=191

are you really telling me EXPLOSIVES wouldnt go off ?

Attached: 1587307934541.png (1018x1024, 1.32M)

I know how nukes work nigga I m refering mostly to the demon core incident, the fissile material is so close to criticality that large impacts can strongly increase neutron emission

again anuke is literally
>fissile material barely subcritical
>surrounded entirely inside fucking explosives designed to make it go kaboom
>explosives that will themselves go kaboom if set on fire

This is a chinese cope thread

A lot of testing.
Turns out developing a next gen tealth multi role fighter with a dozen of other nation's finger in the soup isnt cost effective.

They still have the best jet ever in service, the FA-18

>factual news about incompetent mutts crashing overpriced jewish planes is "cope"
Look in the mirror at your post if you want to see cope my friend.

>A lot of testing.
>Turns out developing a next gen tealth multi role fighter with a dozen of other nation's finger in the soup isnt cost effective.

>400 billion in R&D
>landing leg cant take the weight of the aircraft - BREAKS, many such cases!

somebody get these pilots on a DIET

EVERYONE KNOWS YOU'RE JUST A BITTER REFUGEE FUCK

This
Retard civilians thinking they understand aviation accidents