How come conservatives are so steeped in family values...

How come conservatives are so steeped in family values, but when you ask them about the collective health of society they don't give a fuck at all?

Liberals seem exactly the opposite. They focus much less on family values, but they actually give a fuck about the greater good.

One gives a fuck about the family but not about the nation. The other cares about the nation but not the family.

Attached: conservative-dinner-thanksgiving-family.jpg (1123x668, 92.51K)

>greater good
>reddit spacing
yikes

Because the kikes convinced them in libertarianism to make them soft so that they are complacent when they're getting replaced.

I view it like this.

Right of center: Tends to be more family oriented, and more likely to help directly and locally. Donating or giving to the poor. This used to be a major function of the churches as well.
I was a poor kid growing up, and sometimes church people would drop off about $100-200 worth of food.

Left of Center: Less family oriented. Wants the government to handle "Donating or giving to the poor". The problem is, the funds are often mishandled, and not all tax-givers agree with where the money goes. This also removes the "good-nature" of one man giving to another. Since it comes from the government, it becomes a right rather than something nice done by someone else.

>but they actually give a fuck about the greater good.
Are you insane? Liberals seem hellbent on destroying the greater good.

>they actually give a fuck about the greater good.
you spelled
>are tricked into being commie supporting faggots
wrong

>muh greater good
It's collectivism vs individualism
Nothing more, nothing less..

Attached: 1590309361225.png (621x702, 56.27K)

how come you're such a pozzed faggot? just leave this site, it's not for you.

Attached: 29ac5a74c900437a9ce8112534a69ae5.gif (342x360, 2M)

Take care of yourself and family.
It is your responsibility, not the fucking state.
They will have rules, regulations that will have your head spinning and less choice for your own well being.

Conservatism is retardation, user.

Attached: 103890713_10220974296044836_826647888115261741_n.jpg (720x702, 58.57K)

all well and good. But conservatives are ok if we "do our best" and some children starve to death because, heck, we tried lol. Liberals would like to start taking starving children a bit more serious. Equal to the need, not less

The greater good has been a lost cause a long time ago. I‘d rather spend my energy trying to make my immediate surrounding better for the people i love and myself than use it up for some political agenda that is out of my power anyways.

Attached: 7D063464-73DF-447C-B32E-2FD951A035CE.jpg (615x794, 125.05K)

Black Lives Matter is a corporation registered in Delaware

because strong families will cause strong communities. the family unit is the one thing you can actually control. not rocket science here brah

who's starving bro? show me 1 instance of someone starving in america. we feed kids 2 meals now at school. you telling me you can't feed your kids 1 fucking meal a day. you're pathetic

>How come conservatives are so steeped in family values, but when you ask them about the collective health of society they don't give a fuck at all?
It's because they're not conservatives. They're neocons who pay lip service to social issues.

You're retarded. Conservatives care about the greater good of their nation. They care more about nationalism and community than communists do.

Conservatives are more likely to give/donate than liberals. This has been studied multiple times.

Liberals enact policies that make them 'feel' like they've done something to help. Often these policies do the opposite of the intended effect, making things worse.

Republicans often enact policies that more realistically predict human nature. These polices are seen as mean, even if more effective they are rejected.

There are no kids starving to death in America. Conservatives want people to reach their full potential by themselves where as democrats believe that many humans are incapable of reaching their full potential and must be treated like children by the all powerful state.

Why would I care about someone who isn’t family or friend starving to death? The only way that affects me is if they try to steal from me, in which case the second amendment solves that problem pretty fast. Also kids don’t starve to death in america, not like i give a shit

Destroying everyone's livelihoods with terrible healthcare that doubles their tax load is not noble big picture thinking. You retards are as arrogant as you are ignorant.

Attached: AD_132815125.jpg (2500x1658, 542.83K)

because conservatives are all about freedom and liberals are all about taking control

The idea is that if everyone looks out for themselves and their family, then the world is a healthier place. If you want to contribute to society, and have the means to, we create charities for those unable to take care of themselves. If you're destitute, you should live destitute. All welfare does is create more destittue people, it is always abused.

Corporatism is not Conservatism. You cry when people like Trump want to inhibit Corporations attacking freedom of speech. It's the liberals tha are behind the censoring of speech. So if you blame us Conservatives, what about the Liberals who are behind it?

Im fine with left wing economics plus social conservatism. The problem with welfare is that it is inevitably bogged down by the weight of obese shitskins..

It's become somewhat bastardized over the years, but there's a principle that if you can't keep your own house in order, how do you expect to keep your nation in order? Good households create good states. It's in part why we don't have bachelors in high positions of government.

Charities can often be inconsistent so there is room for a systematic relief program. Welfare is often abused, but so are charities. Welfare only gets a bad rap because it's the niggers who abuse it and make it look less effective than it is.

If people are truly starving they get fed. Religious people are the ones donating the most to soup kitchens. You ignorant buffoon.

Because cons see the family as the primary make up of a society.
Meanwhile liberals are full individualists.

It's not the government's job to take care of your family, it's yours

Are you dense? Charities are not abused, if you donate to a local charity, that's what Conservatism promotes. I truly want the rip your beating heart out of your body, because you're wasting the gift of life.

>but they actually give a fuck about the greater good.
So liberal policies that eventually end up with people eating out of dumpsters is the "greater good"? Let me guess, socialism hasn't been tried yet.

Its simple, if everyone focused on the family and their immediate neighbors, it would spread far and wide. But theres always this fight against it. Why? Greed. Lust. Envy. Pride. Anger. Sloth. Gluttony.

Its FUCKING SIMPLE. Theres ALWAYS going to be bad apples in a batch, but you gotta find them, put them to other uses before they rot the whole batch. One family starts to break, its the other families duty to repair the broken family or integrate whats left into their own.

It has to start in the home and work outwards. Coming from govt or any authority with just be smothering at best, tyrannical at worst..

“Fuck” count: 3

Back to plebbit queer

Shut up faggot, you haven't the remotest clue what you're talking about. You don't know what corporatism is. Corporatism is based and much superior to conservatism.