Zig Forums has never been able to refute this
Tolerance is a Peace Treaty. Valid until broken
>yes, and we've tolerated niggers and Jews long enough
It's not a paradox, its just an excuse to kill off voices you dont like.
Selectively enforced.
I hate that graphic with a passion. It's so easy to refute but if you want a big brain source John Rawls has destroyed it.
You're right, tolerance is bullshit.
That's because Popper talks like a fag and because his shit is retarded.
Every group of people has its scapegoat. Intolerance towards the scapegoat is what allows a group to be tolerant to each others.
>Implying everyone who isn't a heterosexual white male is being tolerant
It means that the Nazis had just as much a right to exist as the Communists, just not together, that's all.
So jews shouldn't be tolerated by this reasoning...
It's cute how this comic pretends like you only do this against literal nazis. Some day you will get what you deserve.
Communists (Soros owned Antifa and BLM) love to use this argument. However, they themselves are intolerant of white people just because of their color of skin, which is racist. But the media hands them the microphone and gives them a polished image. Therefore, OP this is shit bait and you know it.
fpbp and /thread
Historically speaking, anything that isn't Monarchist is leftist. To me, fascists are leftists.
Freedom isn't free
I learned that when I was like 4
Everyone from the Ancient Greeks till Hitler thought that Tolerance was a negative thing.
Even Jesus hated tolerance.
We call this physical removal. No need to refute. Only embrace
>t. Kuehnelt-Leddin
Meaning you need to be fascist to fight the intolerance of low IQ ignorance.
Then you can tolerate ideas bc no one will even willingly support anything harmful, except feminism
Popper was pointing out the paradox of "tolerance" not advocating for violence against thought-criminals. This cartoon is an absolute smoothbrain take.
They forgot to include the first panel where it was them that pushed people to be nazi's, therefore breaking the peace treaty first themselves.
I mean, if you take this image as an example, then blacks are the new nazis. Why should they be allowed to be nazis.
So that means I can go out and start shooting leftists in minecraft?
This is exactly why we should not tolerate Judaism
thanks for introducing me to this interesting character.
popper was a faggot
based, bring back the Ancien Regime
if we can't tolerate intolerance, then that means we have to get rid of the left?
Totally depends on system of governance, and if democratic whether you consider the average voter to be capable of interpreting the world in a competent and discerning manner. It is as simple as that - absolute tolerance only leads to intolerance in a democratic system in a nation of sheep where it is the loudest voice, or in a scenario where what is "tolerant" and "intolerant" is artificially being rolled out from the top (which is kind of a separate issue).
I don't know the answer to which one is correct (most likely a mixture), but to not be fundamentally hypocritical you cannot believe OP's faggot infograph and simultaneously be pro democracy.
to say that the tolerant will inevitably be destroyed by the intolerant is a massive stretch.
the premise "should a tolerant society tolerate intolerance?" already implies that intolerance is a minority trait. how does a minority that is "tolerated" (that does not imply liked or supported) inevitably end up eradicating the majority that tolerates them?
That is pretty much it. I won't be tolerant if you wish to destroy me.
It was refuted about 5 minutes after it came out.
You're just too new to remember.
Pic related.
Work in progress
I guess I can see how this would be true. I have been starting to lean that way myself. People who say kill pedo's should be burnt to death and their children should be sold to Pakistani rape gangs.
Only illiterate midwits take that yid seriously.
based
Paradox are for low-iq shitheads
>1+1=3
doers this not go both ways?