Companies boycotting Facebook for not censoring the right

bbc.co.uk/news/business-53196487

So when I read this I was pretty happy to hear of Jewbook getting fucked, but then I started to think about the implications of this

What we are seeing here is companies are essentially holding Facebook to ransom in a sort of hostile takeover, they are acting just like uppity minorities

Facebook started out as a place for normal people to socialise, the companies asked if they could get in on this to make use of the traffic for advertisements, now they are being uppity and making demands to fit their agenda as if it always belonged to them

In the near future, most social media sites will purely be a corporate advertisement conglomerate that might occasionally let you use it to send messages to your Grandmother if the app isn't broken again

It's pretty fucked up that the Jew who is shilling his advertisements in your face every second post is also the one who gets to decide what you can and can't say

Attached: jewbook.png (660x615, 353.1K)

Attached: E7DD4E8D-BC9F-474F-89D9-12BCB2ACE251.jpg (1182x973, 913.33K)

naw, man. those niggas are boycotting Facebuck for censoring too much.

What's the proper response here

Do we support Facebook more? Will a dip in the market make way for fresh advertisers to get in on the scene?

The issue with this globalization of products is now we have found ourselves extremely limites in choice and now all these companies are making their move to politicize their products, and you have no choice but to buy them because their is nothing else

Sure the average Zig Forums user might boycott them, but on the grand scale of things your average Joe just doesn't have time for that shit

No, they are boycotting Facebook for not censoring enough right wing content, many of them like Ben & Jerrys for example have explicitly stated this on their website

>he doesn't realize that when you're a Jew, you cant say no to more money

It was all planned

Attached: benstein.jpg (320x240, 16.74K)

Yeah smells like bullshit. Facebook wants to censor and asked the companies to "pull out" so FB is "forced" to censor content

he is super wealthy already so he should take a stand for pro-1a.

>Be Leftist company
>See ads about Rights
>"Boycott" by taking your Leftist ads off Facebook
>Now more and more people see Right ads
>Right ads become more prevalent and normal for people
Great plan.

Possible, but doesn't seem essential and is just a few extra steps, it would be an attempt to preserve their image in the eyes of the right, but that image will get tarnished anyway when they cave to the advertisers, so seems pointless

You don't get wealthy by saying 'okay that's enough'

The right is in serious need or reorganization, we don't have the buying power or influence we had in 2016. Mainly because all our commentators got banned across the web, but they were banned because there were consequences because we again have no buying power

Is Zucc secretly a BASED k*ke like Yair Netanyahu?

Attached: 1592963146697.jpg (499x500, 150.49K)

There were no consequences*

>we
FB finds itself in a very difficult position. Support American values and risk losing billions from Woke Street, bureaucrats, “non-governmental organization,” and other unelected trash like the ADL or support the trash and risk the government going after them... and by government I mean the small amount of them left that are not Democrats or RINOs.

Is anyone here seriously still using Facebook? Really? REALLY!!!???


You gotta dump it. It's crap. It has always been crap.

Of course its about censorship and controlling the narrative entirely unopposed.
Its no longer enough that they can buy and spread their own propaganda through social media (thats already heavily biased towards em), anything that might oppose it must be banned as well.

This is a full scale power grab going on right now. They started with the far right and are now silencing the rest.

Zuck is a creepy robot faggot, but I was impressed by him actually saying shit like "social media shouldn't be arbitrating what is true or false or political opinions, etc.." It was kind of based. He's no Elon, but I honestly think the Zuckerbot is trying to stay as neutral as possible.

It's the biggest platform for normies on Earth, you abandon it and they will be met with nothing but pro-Democrat doctrine for the next century. Like it or not it is too big to abandon.

Have their been any actual instants of woke street cancelling a company and the company actually taking a loss?

I remember Gillette supposedly lost billions for their woke campaign and said it was still worth it

I am just not believing that these street commies have more buying power than the average Joe

BASED ZUCK
FUCK THE LIBS

i get into massive fights with my wife over fb. she wants me to defend her from my unwoke family and I am a bad husband if I dont. I DONT EVEN HAVE A FACEBOOK
so I have to fucking call my family “set up boundaries”.

Why doesn't the stupid bitch just block them

It’s all a game.

Attached: 16A7340B-42BB-4666-ACF7-F713971B1085.jpg (1600x900, 311.48K)

So your wife is woke? Why are you with her

The days of free speech on the internet are numbered in the US.

Isn't necessarily bad, the same happens in Singapore for example and those laws actually work in our favor

Focusing on the useful idiots in the streets is a mistake.

Attached: E8DB333C-D372-4318-9BC6-9804A5B68D2E.jpg (1489x1415, 928.44K)

tried to talk to her about that. she is convinced that she can change people. it’s fucking tiring. i don’t believe in divorce, but now I can see why some guys become bar flies

Attached: 344799F9-2C19-4D2D-A504-1EB7888489EE.jpg (1600x900, 83.12K)

Bumped as important.
Big corporations are now nakedly joining the Resistance. Woke capitalism is now happy to be openly partisan. This can't end well. Yes it's good that Zuck is getting a kicking but this will just give him cover to drag Facebook even further left

Attached: ulvzfbsh.jpg (768x1366, 242.39K)

So we should put all out efforts in to the fringe groups like ourselves that make up less than 1% of the population?

Politics is about hardliners on each side trying to swing the votes of the masses, either through offering a better life or emotional manipulation

Holy fuck, openly saying they want the presidents posts censored

Zuckerberg is the strongest defender of free speech online.
This reality is truly another planet's hell.

He knows that if 100% of them are complicit in this there are going to be antitrust issues that the government is going to take up. Facebook is huge and they don't want it broken up.

what do you mean user?

American citizens openly call for harm/death to the president and yet act offended by anything they don't agree with.

It's probably because the platform isn't easily manipulated by government agents

it was ok when it was closed to inside your uni network and you needed a uni password for an account and you could see everyone in your uni and no one outside your uni could see you and you could find out what the hot babe's name is in your intro to anthro class and see if she parties at the same houses you do. then they opened it to high school networks, then work networks, then you could be in multiple networks, then networks stopped being a thing and you were just a goy. started going to shit once networks went away really and opening to public.

It's nice to think that the reptile-man is actually kind of a decent person, but the real reason is probably that the alphabets want to continue using FB as a honeypot and censoring these groups would interfere with that

Attached: dumb fucks.jpg (620x400, 32.56K)