Why doesn't the right care about dead US soldiers killed by Russians? What does Putin have on Trump?

Kek it's milquetoast m8, you're talking out of your leafy ass. Back to HuffPo with you. Don't forget your dragon dildo faggot

>"The intelligence assessment is said to be based at least in part on interrogations of captured Afghan militants and criminals."
THIS is why torture doesn't work in the end. It's great for justifying the utilization of intel you already have, but the second faggots infiltrate intelligence agencies, they just start doing CBT on random goatherders until they hear the BS they demand to hear.

trying to turn the military on Trump? How much longer until the actual coup?

>cause the russians never did anything like that
It's already a known fact that the Russian Government helped the Government of Sudan carry out the Darfur Genocide. Russia is also an ally of Assad. This makes Russia an enemy of the United States.

As soon as they sense riot inflicted weakness in the Trump admin

Because it's probably fake news

The Democrats hated the Bush Administration because unarmed Iraqi civilians were killed in the Iraq War. That was a war crime.
This doesn't change the fact that Russia is funding the Taliban.

No one on Zig Forums gives a monkeys about dead africans, also
>assad bad
You're a joke mate

Attached: photo_2020-06-12_00-39-06.jpg (1280x941, 82.76K)

I have always hated US foreign policy and could not give a goddamn about the US military. The US is constantly funding "rebel/freedom fighter/good guy" groups who instantly turn against the US and allies. I have no problem with Russia doing what the US has been doing for decades

Also, the US military as gone above and beyond to push propaganda and agenda both foreign and domestic for decades and you want me to give a goddamn about dead US soldiers. Get in the box faggots

Attached: 656859881484.jpg (2896x1932, 2.25M)

Another hoax by the left to slide what they are doing right now

>Zerohedge

Do you have a real source? And when it's inevitably shown that Zero Hedge is wrong, what will be the new narrative?

The silver lining is that you've got trannies as cannon fodder now

What is there to say? Two US government facilities were attacked by Ansar al-Sharia.

Because Russia doesn’t kill random citizens.
CIA is a Terrorists organization.

>t. OP now seething that his weaksauce narrative is coming apart at the seams
What is it exactly you need a sauce for? The NYT narrative does not hold water
>inb4 some bullshit reply
Operative word: exactly

This. They just kill people who are a threat to their country. Granted the definition of "threat" is loosely defined, and borders are just a suggestion but they definitely aren't random!

Id rather be russian right now, desu.

There's more truth coming from the likes of Zerohedge and Breitbart than any of the fake MSM shit that rolls off the press.

Attached: 1505379894894.jpg (691x591, 106.05K)

>assad bad
He is literally a dictator. He's similar to Stalin.
That's why the US military is siding with the Syrian democracy movement.

>bro you can’t trust NYT
>read Zerohedge instead

Just lol. You want to link me to OAN too?

Perhaps OP and honorable leafcuck will let the rest of us know what they consider to be credible sources. The (((usual suspects))) no doubt

Attached: 321311313.jpg (1712x1338, 822.72K)

Yes goyim, tell me more about the imperative need to export (((liberal democracy))) to the rest of the world
>Just lol.
Link me to the ZH article that you think discredits the site. Better yet, send me a list. I'll wait.

Attached: 1504125203098.png (600x600, 180.67K)

The Narrative didn't work that Trump is a Russian asset, so they attempt a different angle, question is what's the motivation and the end goal ?

> In 2001 Taliban offered Russian to get united against USA, Sergei Ivanov, head of staff of Russian President’s Cabinet, told BBC.

> After 9/11, Putin offered unhesitating support for the US. He overruled his own national security team and declined to voice any protest when US bases appeared in former Soviet Republics in Central Asia.

> A quixotic offer from the Taliban of a united front against America was rejected with a “universal English term: f--- off!” recalled Sergei Ivanov, then Putin’s defence minister.

panorama.am/en/news/2012/01/20/ivanov/826430

Attached: Sergei_Ivanov.jpg (790x444, 33.92K)

20 years later, why are we still in Afghanistan? China got the mineral rights years ago, and Covid has shown a lot of our meds are produced there.
There goes the Lithium and poppies, so why are we still there?

>The US is constantly funding "rebel/freedom fighter/good guy" groups who instantly turn against the US and allies.
I get what you are saying. The Reagan Administration sided with the Mujahideen and they turned against America because they were Islamists. It's different when the US is siding with Middle Eastern liberals.
>I have no problem with Russia doing what the US has been doing for decades
I believe that siding with Islamism is wrong no matter who does it.
>Also, the US military as gone above and beyond to push propaganda and agenda both foreign and domestic for decades and you want me to give a goddamn about dead US soldiers.
I do care about US soldiers as long as they are siding with Middle Eastern liberals. That is what is happening in Syria. War crimes have been committed in Afghanistan, and that's horrible because no unarmed civilian deserves to be killed, but war crimes are not an inherent part of war. The concept of "war crime" exists in the first place because it is possible to fight a war without war crimes.

Now where have I seen this before?
>17 intelligence agencies said Trump colluded with Russia
>intelligence agencies say there are WMD in Iraq

Ok Chang

Attached: 1593378925598.jpg (746x497, 228.33K)