Excellent question raised in previous post and I wanted to give a proper answer before it archived. Correct, but simple: The Fourth Political Theory is an idea (perhaps a question) posed by Dugin which assumes that Liberal Democracy is in it's twilight stage and will soon fall or enter into conflict with a new theory. He does not provide an answer or definition for this yet - but, his research focuses on finding one. His work regards the Heideggerian concept of "Dasein" which he interprets as a "Civilisation Essence" an idea that this cultural superiority may dominate in anti-Liberal hegemony.
>1st Political Theory: Liberalism >2nd Political Theory: Communism >3rd Political Theory: Fascism >4th Political Theory: ?????
I'm trying to trigger jews with two concepts they hate at the same time. They hate it so much they pretend both don't exist. HUEHUE
Daniel Wilson
The fourth political theory is a refined and clarified form of what fascism was hinting at.
It's the conscious rejection of adherence to ideology or moral principles in favor of a purely ad hoc system of governance based solely on desired outcomes. It's essentially aesthetics elevated to a political party, that asks what you want the world to look like, and then does what it takes to reach that outcome without regard for the right/left or statist/individualist divide.
Andrew Cox
This is very interesting, I assume these are your interpretations rather than anything written by Dugin?
Camden Wilson
>It's afraid It's bot posting
>The fourth political theory is a refined and clarified form of what fascism was hinting at. AHAHAHAHAHAH
> desired outcomes (((What))) are the desired outcomes, my fellow goy?
Jace Perez
It's my own interpretation, though I think it would not be incompatible with Dugin's ideas.
Juan Flores
>It's the conscious rejection of adherence to ideology or moral principles in favor of a purely ad hoc system of governance based solely on desired outcomes >This is very interesting >Sounds pretty good mate
= The definition of (((Marxist-Leninism))) = power for powers sake.
Liberal democracy already died, we're dealing with dindunuffism now.
Kevin Bell
Putin's destruction of the west may or may not be justified, but he certainly isn't pro white russian. He arrests Russians who say "Russia for Russians." He isn't pro white anywhere.
Nicholas King
Well that's the wonder of it as a political theory. You don't have to specify in advance what the goals are before you adopt it, as it can shape itself to whatever the times demand without changing goals creating any inconsistencies in the system.
>(((Marxist-Leninism))) Quite the opposite, my brown friend. Despite Marx's insistence that he was a materialist, Marxism-Leninism was the elevation of ideology over material outcomes. It didn't matter to him what the outcomes were, as long as those outcomes were achieved by the correct means; in his case, worker control over the means of production. If given the choice, Marx would say society was better in poverty under communism than in prosperity under monarchism or republicanism or any other system.
The system I'm proposing looks towards outcomes, and works backwards to find the means to reach those outcomes. Say you decide that the goal needs to be the creation of beautiful and safe cities, or that the goal needs to be maximizing individual access to consumer products: The moment you pick a goal, that's what matters. If some aspect of this goal is best achieved through central planning or worker ownership of the means of production, then than okay. But if that goal is best achieved through private enterprise and vigorous policing of minorities, then that's okay as well. Indeed, if separate aspects of your goals are simultaneously met by different sociopolitical systems in different aspects of society, let them coexist. Perhaps central planning of construction in urban areas combined with harsh racist policing, while the countryside has private enterprise and permissive policing.
Luke Long
sometimes you have to wonder, is putin holding the lid down on worse people?
Jose Hughes
Real kakistocracy has never been tried before. HUEHUEHUE
Leo Hill
MONARCHISM FUCKERSSS WE’RE GOING WAY BACK
Lucas Torres
(((Mafia))). Jewtin is in a territory under their influence, they originated during the USSR regime as employees, traffickers, criminals... and in the end scammed the country out of its state companies during the fall of USSR.
Owen Collins
So it's the same jewish crap that was implemented on Germany, Portugal, Spain, USSR, ...
Carter Jenkins
Take the constitutional monarchy pill
Brandon Perez
yes an opposition to modern liberalism will eventually happen. Dugin wise wise not to attempt to define it.
This. Putin's chef is a mobster that was in prison for 12 years for CHILD TRAFFICKING! >On 29 November 1979, Prigozhin was given a suspended sentence for stealing (in Leningrad). In 1981 he was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment under articles of robbery, fraud, and involving teenagers in prostitution. Prigozhin spent nine years in prison before he was released en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yevgeny_Prigozhin
And people think Putin is /ourguy/? Give me a break.
Justin Roberts
Because there is no way he could allow something like "Russia for Russians". There are lot of other nationalities that live in russia who lived there for at least a 1000 years like Chechens or Tatars. Proclaiming Russia for Russians would just tear the country apart since all the other nationalities would try to leave and you would get 90's Chechnya war x100. Keep in mind that "Russians" in this case refers to nationality of eastern European finno ugric slavs, not citizens of Russia.
Josiah Morgan
His focus on "Dasein" was not just random or original. There is a lot of effort and research being put into the expression of Collective Identity in the modern world.
