The right never experiments or innovates, because to do so would be anti-conservative. Meanwhile the left revolutionizes (breaks down, creates something new) until it's the new norm. The right lost the culture war a long time ago.
"why are the most influential bands liberal?"
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
open.spotify.com
twitter.com
Jewish record labels.
The left revolutionizes in retarded cultural shit. Rarely anything of significant life improving value.
Led zeppelin weren’t really that liberal or counter culture although they were abit degenerate with all the drugs and shagging. Also AC/DC are far from liberal
*blocks your path*
Rush is based
Fpbp
hate him or not, you have to admit he was a talented song writer
Thoughts on Michael Gordon Oldfield?
>"why are the most influential bands liberal?"
proof?
last i checked the most influential bands are non-political.
I posted it as a joke lol
Anyone who has their eyes (and ears!) open can easily recognize John wrote the best songs
>an atheist jew
>an atheist ex-randian, later a democrat
Most of the song which I'm listen are not even in English, but ones which I do pretty conservative, but innovative too.
Also the most popular song in the world is in Spanish and seems to be conservative.
>a bit degenerate
>do as thou wilt on zep 3
Beatles suck you fucking boomers, and music is inherently worthless, try innovating something that matters lmao
The fact that i like Led Zepplin probably means that he is indeed liberal (which i didn't know).
Brainlet take. Art and culture is highly influential and helps legitimize certain ideas.
The Left is no longer "The Left"; it's the new "Right". the term "The Left" is just a guise they have to seem like they're innovating when in reality, they are a degenerative. Being gay or communist isn't innovative at all, in fact to the contrary, it's probably the most degenerative things a person can be. The Conservative is supposed to conserve culture, traditions, religion, teachings, arts, etc. That's why many people (especially liberals) are drawn to countries who have preserved culture (Japan, etc.) However, today's so-called "liberals" are actually Fascists that attempt to destroy cultures for being "wrong."
non-political usually means slightly left. that's just the default, at least in america
The most popular song in the world is in Spanish.
>implying all influential metal & country artists and bands are liberal
Johnny Ramone was a gun toting, Reagan voting republican, Alice Cooper is a conservative and always was, Johnny Cash & Charlie Daniels are/were conservative, Kid Rock, Ted Nugent, Slayer's Tom Araya... can keep going.
Just because Sabaton isn't celebrated publicly doesn't mean it doesn't has massive influence
this dude’s based: open.spotify.com
Why do jews run hollywood and the music industry?
Despacito?
The Beatles were such fags
the beatles were not really that liberal. they promoted peace, big deal
intelligent people are usually mentally ill. mental illness causes liberalism
Children are liberal because they are spending their parents money. So they have time for shit like bands. People who have kids are working jobs and dont have time for concerts. Young people are also always rebelling against their parents so they push rebellious shit that pisses their parents off. Its not hard to figure out.
eh haven't heard of him
America actually put a lot of time and money into promoting art to combat the USSR. The USSR suppressed art since they knew its power, and they ended up banning The Beatles and the Rolling Stone from preforming in their country. It's important to note though that the USSR isn't actually left, but red-coated fascists. The "huur music is dumb and doesn't matter" is a shit argument.
The basedboys
The only son John actually loved turned out pretty based.
People who gain fame and money through the arts do not live in the same world as the average folk. Its why their minds think all the shit they preach will work.
They dont live it at all.
I don't know, Paul beats the hell out of women. That seems pretty based to me.
That your worldview stops at say, 1961 is amusing.
Studies actually show that there are more conservatives in the arts compared to liberals. The difference is that conservative artists don't shove their politics down everyone's throat, so as a result it is assumed that conservatives are underrepresented when it comes to art.
>Art and culture is highly influential and helps legitimize certain ideas.
Unfortunately, and for emotional rather than logical people.
For a society to be stable it must be conservative. Artists exist best as a counter culture. When an artificial liberal society exists, it forces all artists to be conservatives, which does not work. The world is broken. Break it, and start again.
I BURIED PAUL
>implying a white quartet fronted by a wife beater would be influential in the modern day
Liberals are already trying to downplay the importance of the Beatles and claim that their most influential songs were ripped from black American folk singers and Indians.
it's a huge mistake to think either the "left" or "right" won a "war".
Both are necessary for a healthy society. Societies must be liberal and adapt. But they must also not throw away their identity and change too fast.
The inability to understand this will destroy the country.
>Led Zeppelin
>he
this has to be a joke, right?