BBC says that there is only one humann race

I don't mind how you call it but there is no equality among different human populations, bbc said that under the skin we are all equal, that's the most anti scientific shit I've ever read

That is not what science says at all. Its just that your skin color is not all that important other than telling you where your ancestors may have been vs the equator, which gives clues to what other hominids your homo sapien ancestors were raping.

Kek

A race with different species...like most living creatures.
You'd think one of the biggest organisations of natural history programmes can't get this right.

I will give you a prime example. European whites and many asians are both white. We were dominating different hominids though.

Saying there is only one human race is racism now

BASED

Attached: 1593059764134.jpg (1071x1214, 81.76K)

racism has been eradicated, gj bbc

We are not dogs. Holy shit.

If that's true then hows come niggers want us dead?

Leftists and liberals hold the idea that we are a product of evolution, and that means human biodiversity exists. But they subscribe to the idea that the human brain is total tabula rasa at birth, a blank slate, and that all life outcomes and behaviours are a result of environmental factors. Its obviously completely ideological and not based on science at all, but thats what they believe. In reality, it is because both liberalism and communism, the two ideological camps that push racial egalitarianism, view the human as a unit of production and consumption, so our unique qualities as nations and races are seen as something that is either unimportant or illusory, because that kind of division is obstructive to the expansion of capitalism and communism. Its the same reason why christians hate talking about race. They are all different forms of universalist ideologies, who dont care about the facts of human biodiversity because it gets in the way of their expansion, so they lie and suppress science that points out the differences between races.

>implying "scientists" can relied on anymore
Get back to me when the Replication Crises ends lmao

Attached: Simpsons Theater.gif (500x375, 134.98K)

Then why did jews force all niggers to become sterile to enter Israel? Why havent we gotten the niggers in Israel rallied up for some of dem reparations?

>Meanwhile, in actual science

Attached: 59DD6B06-FAD7-4F90-8E8B-0CC8A4684C75.jpg (1047x415, 108.76K)

You notice how they never said Dr. Watson was incorrect, it's just that he hurt their feelings.

Facts over feelings.

Attached: diversityisstrength.jpg (1024x533, 111.88K)

Attached: dogbreed.jpg (500x331, 20.12K)

>no mention of autosomal ancient populations

Classic continuum fallacy by lefties with the race issue. Just because teal exists, doesn't mean green and blue are not distinct colors. Similarly, just because some people don't neatly fit into what we classify as the "black race" or the "white race", doesn't mean that black people and white people are not distinct from each other. Yes, you could argue that the categories of black, white, asian, hispanic are arbitrarily drawn. But like with any spectrum, you have to make the cutoff somewhere. And even though the cutoff is somewhat arbitrary, the difference between points along it is still obvious. The point is that divergent evolution between seperate, geographically isolated human populations happened, due to the different selective pressures on those populations by their unique environments. We colloquially refer to these separately evolved populations as races. It is nonsense and anti-science to claim that this divergent evolution stopped at the neck.

I have this picture on hand whenever I'm in that type of convo and Normie's try to say my ideas are anti science and racist.

>Out of the five gorillion creatures on Earth, only humans don't have subspecies

Attached: no.png (225x225, 7.44K)

Share the one about nigs having up to 19% proto hominid dna that is recent