Coronachan Hoax

From what I have gathered it is still unclear to what extent and how long lasting immunity is. However, in most cases you would be correct assuming the pathogen does not mutate to evade the antibody.

Depends on how long lasting the antibody is, but presence does suggest past infection. This of course assumes the test has a high specificity and is not producing false positives, which some of the Corona tests have been known to do.

>some tests
no, all tests have a false positive rate. the tests for these antibodies are unable to differentiate between antibodies for different corona viruses. they are useless.

Nigger a papaya in Tanzania tested positive and so did a goat

wait till most people learn that the antiseptic UV wand doesn't do anything more than light up

Antibody test is useless, it comes up positive for any virus in the same family which includes the common cold

Yes, you are correct that all medical tests have a false positive rate. I was more commenting on how several of the Corona tests were shown to be well outside the acceptable rate.

Antibody here, can confirm:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8493669/Genes-raise-risk-dying-Covid-19-inherited-NEANDERTHALS.html

This, not to mention that the tests give false positives more than half the time even if you don't have these magical antibodies. Why? because made in chinkland. They are designed that way to spread panic.

Was the goat also in tanzania

>has antibodies for coronaviruses
Congratulations, that means that at some point in your life you got the common cold.

If someone can actually prove the specific efficacy on strictly ncov-19 antibody tests, I'd change my statement to:

Congratulations, you have a working human immune system. You probably have been infected multiple times with various diseases and your Honey Badger immune system couldn't give a fuck; you got shit to do.

>Test shows I have antibodies
>I never got sick so it must be a lie!
I mean you're basically just admitting you're dumb, OP.

I had the test when I was having similar symptoms, trouble breathing, severe congestion, etc., way back in late March.
Scared shitless, went to doc in a box.
Doc said he thought all I had was a severe upper respiratory flu, or the common cold. They gave me some albuterol inhaler and it took me weeks to recover.
Anyway the clinic called me a week later and said I tested negative for corona, so what you said sounds like absolute horse shit you bongolian, uh, spreader of false ... stuff.
By the way, the swabbing isn't that bad, unless you're a pussy.

The same way you'd spread it if you did have symptoms, just in a lower quantity. The immune system is not perfect and plenty of your cells get infected without being detected, allowing for the creation of new virus particles to be spread.

This is incorrect. There are specific antibodies unique to this type of coronavirus.

Immunity may not exist. Antibody dependent enhancement not disproven

>>has antibodies for coronaviruses
>Congratulations, that means that at some point in your life you got the common cold.
Retard, the test is specifically for the COVID-19 type of coronaviruses. Otherwise, what's the point of testing in the first place? Scientists aren't as retarded as you.

Well at least your not a nigger with HIV.

>Was the goat also in tanzania
tanzanian goat singing fruit salad board

Antibody tests are terribly unreliable, giving constant false positives and negatives no matter who is taking it. That's why if they were serious, they'd make you take multiple tests.

Also there is no immunity. It'll just be like the flu with yearly "vaccines" to get it under control, because coronaviruses aren't ever "cured," in the same way that the flu/colds exist.

>The same way you'd spread it if you did have symptoms
So by coughing and sneezing without coughing or sneezing? Turn your brain on and try again.

Show me the test. If this test exists, it will be described online with detail.

Coronavirus is the common cold. Everybody has anitbodies to some coronavirus.
This is the hoax - the "pandemic" is just the common cold.
The other test, PCR, is for "active infection" and it replicates RNA --- and, again, everybody has RNA that can show a false positive test.
So both tests are meaningless and the whole thing is a scam.

>>I mean you're basically just admitting you're dumb, OP.
>piece of paper from the gubbmint so must be true
>t. uni educated assclown

>have no clue what it means
>posted about it anyway
You retards are so unaware I'd yourselves it's actually amazing.

The tests for antibodies can detect antibodies of related viruses too, doesn't mean you are immune or already had wuflu

Once again Zig Forums demonstrates its the lowest IQ board