Female Unshodism also known as the Deshodding Movement are 21st Century reactions to not only consumerism but consumerism's haphazard intersection with slavery, sex trafficking, exploitation and destruction.
Unshodism critically examines women's shoes as symbolic for both those terrible practices as well as the social conditioning programmed into modern women to support any lucrative fashions no matter how illegal, unethical or harmful.
How can you support Deshodding and Unshodism?
>Celebrate barefoot women in art, media
>Establish and defend the preference for unshod women (remember, it's the pre-capitalist norm)
>Introduce positive aspects of barefoot women in everyday conversation
>Invent new idioms and stories defining the advantages and wisdom of unshod women
>Compliment and support unshod women
>Public shaming of shoe whores, flat-flappers, heel-danglers, flip-flop fidgeters
>Public shaming of the men parading slave-made shoes on their women's oppressed feet
>Protest women shoe stores that sell any shoes beyond those intended for wear inside a domesticated home (e.g. slippers).
>Remind women and men of the evils of shoe supply chains, shoe designers and shoe brands
>Ignore shoe shills and their tiddy and assmen-junkies
Female Unshodism also known as the Deshodding Movement are 21st Century reactions to not only consumerism but...
What this is:
>This is a movement in order to simply remove all footwear from women, as it would prevent them from going in the workplace, and to encourage them to stay at home and retain the family unit, which is smallest possible unit of national identity. Women's shoe apparel manufacturers artificially created a degenerate culture, founded by (((them))), and ran almost exclusively by homosexual men (who have no interest in women), around the time of the Women's Suffrage Movement, in order to empower women, cripple their feet in unnatural ways, and as a status symbol for degenerate promiscuity. Barefoot women were often looked up to with attraction, and were preferred in the arts and media prior to the 20th century, as it pertains to their natural beauty, submissiveness, and humility, as can be seen today when women would often subconsciously make men want to notice their feet, such as paint their nails, make suggestive movements, and to keep dry or cracking skin from forming.
What this is NOT:
>This is in no way to be confused or mistaken with paraphilia regarding women's feet. This is also in not intended to be a short-lived fashion trend, and is not only to be restricted to just young, attractive women. Anything regarding that as such would be considered degenerate, and counteractive to this movement. This is also in no way to be marketed in a way to be monetized in any possible way.
Advantages:
>Women would be kept out of the workplace and workforces, as they were prior to the 20th century, and would have men provide the finances for the sustainability of the family as a whole.
>Women's feet would be healthier and naturally shaped.
>Anti-American (and Anti-Western) women's shoe manufacturers would all go bankrupt, as well as women saving up their money for more meaningful possessions
This is the only possible way to bring back traditional gender roles in a short period of time. Women would be kept out of the workplace, and would be denied the right to vote, as well as for women to openly embrace their most natural state, which they chose to be in, during the pre-industrial era (which is further exemplified via evidence during classical arts, in which nearly ALL women are shown to be deshodded). It's time to embrace traditionalism again, user. If you are a woman, I highly encourage you to be deshodded right now. If you are a man, then I would help you to encourage women around you to be deshodded.
Based &
Cutepilled
bump
I have no interest in wimin anymore.
That is because they do not have vulnerabilities anymore, due to the artificial barrier between their soles and the ground. Bring back the vulnerabilities combined with their delicate feet, and then they would easily submit to men, while men would provide, care for, and protect them, all while women nurture and care for their children in a safe and protected environment.
Deshodded women would NOT be able to partake in demanding jobs, meaning that they have MORE freedoms around the home, and would be subject to far less abuse which they claim exist, all while DOUBLE the jobs with DOUBLE the pay open up for men, who would make more than enough money to provide for their deshodded wives and daughters (and shodded sons).
I too have a foot fetish.
Foot fetish faggot movement.
This isn't a foot fetish, as clarified in the above post.
This is about restoring natural gender order in the simplest, quickest, and most natural way possible, without any sexual connotations attached to it. Several women in the past, when reading prior threads, were intrigued by this idea.
Based thread, as always.
Based
i agree, barefoot women are the best kinds of women.
we could even reward them with sandals occasionally for them to roam and explore in the land that their ancestors fought to secure for them (with a male to accompany them of course).
Based unshod poster
I do admit that deshodded women are more attractive than shodded women. But that is not the point of this movement. The point here is that women would be restricted in their movements to areas that are safe enough for them to be in.
Any place where it is safe for women to be barefoot in, is a place worth living in.
No. ANY footwear for women would lead back down the slippery slope to feminist degeneracy.
>Several women in the past, when reading prior threads, were intrigued by this idea.
True. Day of the foot can't come fast enough. Needs more attention.
Are you a female, or know of any females who would willingly deshod?
Would you be able to convince them about doing so for the sake of restoring natural societal order?
Fuck off degent foot nigger. I do like a woman with small feminine soft feet. But if they walk around barefoot all the time, they're gonna end up with nasty national geographic hooves. OP is obviously a dirt/smell fetishist degenerate whereas I can just appreciate well kept, clean soft feet.
The difference is like me being an ass man but OP is a scat/brap nigger trying to start a "don't wipe" movement.
>Any place where it is safe for women to be barefoot in, is a place worth living in.
Well then it's definitely not in the Southern States of the USA, because we have plants here called "Devil Spurs" and they are sharp plants that form as soft plantlife, but they emit hard and sharp balls of spikes and continue to do so. I wouldn't want to have to continuously deal with women complaining about devil spurs in their skin when we could allow them to explore the land while refusing them to go any further than the land that was secured for them.
That is because of unnatural, rough pavement hardening up what should otherwise be soft and delicate. Replace all pedestrian walkways with dirt and grass, and women's feet would remain perpetually soft.
>Are you a female, or know of any females who would willingly deshod?
I'm not, but managed to convince my sister to go barefoot after she saw me reading one of the deshoddism threads.
>Several women in the past, when reading prior threads, were intrigued by this idea
Suicide speed runners aren't women, bucko.
Enjoy your parasites!
This. Definitely ulterior motives behind this.
You're not going far enough with this concept. Cunts should not be allowed to wear clothes at all. Letting them wear clothes gets them thinking they're people. If most a cunt is allowed to wear is a collar she'll know her place.
How does she enjoy it user?
Does she still do it?
I would rather this not fall into degeneracy.
Problems with this idea;
1. It will instantly be traced back to Zig Forums and dismissed as naaahtzee bullshit.
2. You cant make all sidewalks dirt or grass. There are reasons they were made solid in the first place, facilitate rain off and flood management, preventing erosion, preventing shifting/damage to high rising structures etc.
3. Feminists will just insist on women only transport to carry them to their high powered jobs, with all the cleaning staff to sterilize the floor each day being low wage males. Feminists aren't going to give up the workplace for anything, not when they're making constant gains.
4. For reasons state in number 2, the average woman will end up with nasty, beaten up feet.
>1. It will instantly be traced back to Zig Forums and dismissed as naaahtzee bullshit.
Not if it ISN'T traced back here. Female deshodding is generic enough to not be traced back to Zig Forums.
>2. You cant make all sidewalks dirt or grass. There are reasons they were made solid in the first place, facilitate rain off and flood management, preventing erosion, preventing shifting/damage to high rising structures etc.
New technologies would have to be developed then, in order to allow safe traversal for women and for societal protections, as well as new laws and statues for public places be clean for women to walk through.
>3. Feminists will just insist on women only transport to carry them to their high powered jobs, with all the cleaning staff to sterilize the floor each day being low wage males. Feminists aren't going to give up the workplace for anything, not when they're making constant gains.
We can make job requirements make shoes mandatory, which would be de-facto make it men only.
>4. For reasons state in number 2, the average woman will end up with nasty, beaten up feet.
Promotion of podiatrist health will be in place to prevent that.
There are no downsides.
Six months she's been walking around barefoot everywhere she can, seem t enjoy it. I can't tell if she's trolling me or not though.
Could you ask her to provide pictures of her feet, if she doesn't mind?
I would love to date a girl like her, seeing how she is embracing conservative, traditional values.
>I would rather this not fall into degeneracy
>posts literal dirty soles fetish shit