Why do right-wingers tend to be more physically attractive than lefties?

(you)

Attached: This is the person calling you incel.jpg (898x1468, 134.1K)

The left wing tells people who are ugly that they never have to improve their looks to find a mate/sexual contact

That's a picture of socialists. Cali, WA, and OR are quite confederate states lately.

Conservatives are attractive because they have OCD making them more self conscious.

well if they didn't have at least one redeeming quality they'd be extincted

Can you imagine the internal heartache of the parents that spawned this thing? I often wonder about dinners at home with family when I see people like this. It must be truly awful.

I don't think Zig Forums incels are physically attractive

Healthy minds live in healthy bodies

We also love nature more than the left.

Attached: DSCN7404.jpg (3264x2448, 1.58M)

Proof?

Attached: sdfghj.png (886x691, 765.36K)

There would have to be a third variable there that is driving the correlation. Could be a lot of things, like wealth (attractiveness is correlated with wealth) or genes (genes are correlated with geographical location which is correlated with political orientation).

Yes, ugly people, aka, children of ugly/single mothers, love to depend on the state, and force others into the same situation.

i've noticed this as well. My friends on the right desire to be in nature or in its different parts while my friends on the left desire to be seen in a certain nature. As in, I'll see the "doctored" posts on social media from the left about something more akin to a "landmark" which at this point has changed definitions to mean something more instagrammable and processed. The right being in nature means at least in comparison that they are more apart of the wild. Not always but in more instances.

Nevermind, it was controlled for socioeconomic status.

because we’re god’s chosen people

Attached: 8D280FD1-16D5-453D-84AC-2D8070BF9DCE.jpg (1242x2208, 233.71K)

Attached: 1572756761630.jpg (2500x2143, 640.41K)

physical attractiveness is just the external projection of health
healthy people don't need gibs because they are capable of getting their share own their own. lefties fight for and need gibs because they're sickly, weak and incapable. i realised this around the time of the HWNDU streams... all the white antifa types looked like junkies: short, skinny, pale, sunken black eyes
these are the kind of people that wouldn't have survived childhood in the past but no grow up to be adults that no one has any use for --> we need equality/communism so the output of the capable ones gets redistributed to me

Yes, I'm a Nazi. How could you tell?

Attached: IMG_20200706_030106269~2.jpg (2448x3264, 472.92K)

I don’t know? Input, process output.

Input: Vegan onions and mental sickness

Process: processing

Output: see pic

Nobody respects weakness.

Attached: B721B025-F94F-4BBE-989B-EF664F7FCFF5.jpg (768x1024, 154.29K)

I am ugly as fuck and I am right wing.

I'm going to give you a serious answer so that at least when you ignore it you'll be ignoring the good shit.

Right wing politics (conservatism) is concerned with conserving the existing society. Naturally, the people who are attracted to conserving the existing society are the people who that society benefits. This means the rich people, the beautiful people, the functional people. Basically the "winners".

Left wing politics is a much, much broader church, but that said a large plank of it is just the egalitarianism of the "losers" who are seeking a fairer shake. Whether the conservatives or the progressives are right is a question of the time, and is not fixed throughout history. The conservatives are not always right, and neither are the progressives. Sometimes society is unfair. Sometimes the progressives are going in the wrong direction. Often, they're both happening at the same time.

Why do right-wingers tend to be more physically attractive than lefties? Because they're winners. But does this mean they're better people? Well, it depends what you mean by better. They're certainly better at winning, and if you think winners winning and losers losing makes everything better for everyone then you probably won't have a problem with that. It's pretty obvious though that we're all beneficiaries of a genetic lottery, so none of us are actually self-made. Even the most archetypal rags-to-riches story is enabled by biological underpinnings that rob the achievement of at least some of its mythos.

What's my point?

My point is that if reading that people you agree with are more fuckable than people you don't gives you any form of satisfaction whatsoever, you're in this game for the wrong reasons.

Average leftist.

Attached: 1588290921165m.jpg (713x1024, 70.88K)

Oh, and also because right wing politics correlate with trait conscientiousness - right wingers just work harder at everything, including themselves.

>This means the rich people

Jews are ugly af.

Attached: 1559237765712.jpg (729x820, 96.34K)

Because they are whiter

i've always been conservative/standyourground/notbeacuck and been twigtwink like these lads and i've never tried to talk my way out of a fight or avoid it to the exent i'm sure these boys do.
i like this, also show flag. if you really wanted to break if down you can move the goalposts for what is winning in life or completely change the definition how you see fit. can make you think

because the right shames it's uglies/fatties/whatevers where the left doesn't. there's no quality control

>kleinfelters
kek

Handsome. Mustache is a little ridiculous though.

We are given God's blessing

Attached: 1569520523719.jpg (640x480, 34.37K)

good one, but do you want to see my dick hair? shit looks like the fucking hurtgen forest

slave vs master morality explained by nietztche