Diversity advocates on both the Left and Right are waging class war against working class whites. We obviously can't force richer whites to care, so how to radicalize working class whites with this knowledge?
Diversity is Class Warfare
If you think about it if white people would live in fear for their lives for say the next decade I think things would be about even. There's not much wrong with an average white person getting his ass kicked in broad daylight by a black guy or a hispanic guy for a while. I mean as shitty as we've fucking treated these people you can't honestly tell me we don't deserve it
>so how to radicalize working class whites with this knowledge?
Normies will wake up to whomever eventually pushes them too far.
Right now, normies are 2 steps away from massacring ANTIFA/BLM if they don't see order.
The working class wants order first.
The working class doesn't exist in the US, capitalists have run up the score for you guys for the last 40 years. There's no class consciousness.
Since you should always shoot the traitor first, how about you kys.
>normies are 2 steps away from massacring ANTIFA/BLM if they don't see order
I guess I'm asking more why don't working class whites put 2+2 together and see that it's the elite whites subjecting them to antifa/BLM, and direct their rage at the elites for CREATING disorder (by proxies), instead of "demanding order", which is basically demanding the same system that subjected them to abuse.
>The working class doesn't exist in the US
I agree if you mean no ORGANIZED labor exists, but there are laborers, and they form a distinct class.
>There's no class consciousness
That's what I'm hoping to answer with this thread, ie, how to develop class consciousness, specifically for white workers.
bump for serious discussion
bump
Ah yes, the Soviet Union's prime directive: "Kill all the white people or something."
This is who draws this retarded nazi shit, btw.
>against working class
economic incentive is not a factor of Collective Identity
You need a miracle. Like I said, capitalists have run up the score. They control both parties and virtually every media outlet. They split the working class with identity bullshit. I really don't know, people used to say just wait until things get worse and the people will wake up, but how much worse can things actually get? The ruling class is too smart to let the rest of the country literally starve and they've grown too efficient in controlling the culture and narrative. 50 years ago you could count on the press to ally with labour movements, but they've been completely subverted by idpol and the rise of managerial class. They don't consider the common worker their comrade anymore, but instead they see them as one of "those" people, a rube, a dull idiot, a prole.
>We
Suck a bag of micro nigger dicks, rabbi
>Left and Right
people are not direction wings
>you can't honestly tell me we don't deserve it
I can with a straight face to your gay face
previous thread:
This illusion at the bottom of pic demonstrates how color is perceived. The illusion of Color Identity requires a person to believe color as causation to define Collective Identity. The truth is that color is impossible to define and you are controlled by whoever controls the meaning of that color when it is adopted as Collective Identity
Color only exists as a perception within the mind. People have the tendency to falsely attribute characteristics of a shared reality to this perception.
Critical Theory and other forms of non-cognitive judgments capitalize upon this because it provides an opportunity to deconstruct our shared reality we know to be objective. It does so outside the immediate awareness our shared understanding so that eventually we diverge along paths of knowledge that cannot be agreed upon
This deconstruction of our objective reality makes us totally reliant upon those who deconstructed it to then provide for us meaning that we cannot determine for ourselves collectively.
This deconstruction has to be continuously reinforced to validate what they replace our objective meaning with.
>The truth is that color is impossible to define and you are controlled by whoever controls the meaning of that color when it is adopted as Collective Identity
The Color Category of Identity is a tool used for libel
-Illegitimate power requires avoidance of accountability
-Illegitimate power requires the absence of your agency to make collective moral judgments
-Illegitimate power requires the absence of truth-by-consensus
-Illegitimate power requires the absence of self-knowledge
-Illegitimate power requires an unwillful following of dependence on illegitimate power
-Illegitimate power requires consent to illegitimate power
Color is non descriptive of identity
~Therefor~
Color identity is demoralization
~if~
-We cannot express Collective Identity based upon the perception of color
-Color cannot express Collective identity
-Color cannot be identity
-Color is the opposite of identity
~It is then true that~
-The Color Category of identity prevents collective identity and is a barrier to expression of collective agency
-The Color Category of Identity is a barrier to True Collective Identity
~This is why~
-The Color Category of Identity is how they choose to name you
-The Color Category of Identity is the only acceptable identity you are allowed to have
-The Color Category of Identity is used to solicit the absence of your agency
~Therefor~
-Identity is a means to express Collective Moral Agency
-Collective Moral Agency requires True Collective Identity
I've seen this get posted a few times and I've legitimately never understood it. Is it just schizo rambling? Or some sort of trolling? Or am I just dumb and this makes perfect sense?
It's not like there aren't historical precedents of right-wing pro-labor movements. I'm not trying to debate big picture about those, or the particulars of their ideologies. I'm just trying to figure out, in this modern context (idpol + managerial class, etc) as you say, the idpol fails to recruit white workers as it always has into "pro diversity". That stuff only works on the managerial class and above. For the last few years, the focus has been "online culture war" to "meme" white workers into consciousness, but even this was poisoned to a large extent by the managerial class. Even the alt-right wound up led by a lot of cultural liberals with managerial values, many of whom were anti-worker in many respects.
What worked, say, for the NSDAP to radicalize labor in the 20's and 1930's?
He is against the use of the word "white" when referring to race. Unfortunately, few people recognize the word "Aryan", or words like "Europid", and saying "people of european bio-ethnic extraction" is such a mouthful, it hinders easy conversation. In short, yes, it's autistic rambling. Seems like he doesn't it to derail threads about race.
read the previous thread
Collective Identity is important
People need Collective Identity to self-organize politically
People oppose your political interests
Those people do not want you to have Collective Identity
~because~
Collective Identity is necessary to express objective moral judgements and hold power accountable
~therefore~
They name you what they name you for a reason
~because~
Color Categories of Identity are self-deconstructive
~since~
People cannot share experience of color
~therefore~
Objective moral judgments do not form associations with Color Categories of Identity
Why do you feel the need to bomb threads with this off topic focus you have?
>fellow whites
>how to radicalize working class whites with this knowledge?
keep making threads about it
im getting fucking sick of /leftypol/
my only main boards are Zig Forums and Zig Forums and they choose to raid both
>Diversity advocates on both the Left and Right are waging class war against working class whites. We obviously can't force richer whites to care, so how to radicalize working class whites with this knowledge?
You solicit people to consent to libel
it is not off topic.
I'm not reading a while thread full of this bizarre, unintelligible dialogue. Can't you summarise what you are talking about in a couple of buzzword-free sentences and then go into more detail from there?
Thanks for the information, it seems pretty accurate.
>You solicit people to consent to libel
You only complain about people using the word "white" for a discussion of race when the thread is serious. I never see you spam/flood this shit in any slide threads.
>Diversity is class warfare
Yes and no
Class is caste and caste is race
Left and right are jew parties who use racial warfare to bludgeon their enemies to death since they're so greatly outnumbered.
>Fellow white people
nice bait user
>STOP. SEEKING. MY. FUCKING. HARM.
>he said as he invaded Poland
Make your own topic thread for your personal theories on semantics, stop spamming them in other topics to derail serious questions. It hurts the quality of discussion on an already fucked up board
>Can't you summarise what you are talking about in a couple of buzzword-free sentences and then go into more detail from there?
>I never see you spam/flood this shit in any slide threads.
implying
>You only complain about people using the word "white"
>just a word bro
Make a new thread on this topic, I would like to discuss it with you.
if none of this is true, why are you so upset?
>implying
Implying you dont give a fuck when "white" is said in 90% of threads, you just do this autistic spamming in serious threads.
they can chose to assault me in broad daylight, i can chose i defend myself with a .45
It's not really telling me anything when you are just pointing at volumes of text and telling me to read them. Can you not explain your ideology in a rational manner or something? Can you only communicate through giant over-bloated text-filled images?
I'm guessing you are just a schizo at this point, since you can't even communicate with someone who's asking reasonable questions.
>invaded
Poland was part of the empire just 30 years prior, faggot.
>serious threads.
>white color working class
>economic incentive is not a factor of Collective Identity
>It's not really telling me anything when you are just pointing at volumes of text and telling me to read them. Can you not explain your ideology in a rational manner or something? Can you only communicate through giant over-bloated text-filled images?
perceiving the real is only possible with the desire to perceive. Attempting to reduce a political topic to absurdity is fallacy. There is plenty of both summarization, sources, proofs, and explanations
>Class is caste and caste is race
That's why I think it's interesting that white elites use non-whites against white labor.
>I'm guessing you are just a schizo at this point, since you can't even communicate with someone who's asking reasonable questions.
Your interpretation is overdeterministic
Your ignorance cannot prescribe pathology
Your ignorance is not my pathology
You ignore proof and analysis
>elite whites
Its OK to say jews here
>NOOOO ITS MINE
Point taken, but I deliberately choose to say whites, meaning non-jews, precisely because jews have historically functioned as the allies of "European princes". Hitler wrote about how jews "subvert from above", usually by ensnaring the European upper classes in some kind of financial schemes. In today's context, they ally with white elites, who consciously embrace jews into their oligarchy against their own racial kin.