Arizona: Kelly has a sizable lead on McSally and given her unpopularity as of late and Arizona's past voting habits, it seems to me that this state will be closely in favor for Biden.
Texas, Georgia, and Florida: Trump will probably win these states. Texas has been moving more left and left in the past 2 decades each election. I highly doubt Biden could win these states, even though Florida is always considered a swing state, but if he does, its over for Trump.
Rust Belt: Wisconsin is looking to be favored by Biden, but Trump's increased ad attention may tilt the balance eventually. Overall, Republicans are making the same mistake Democrats did in 2016 by completely ignoring the Rust Belt by stopping ads in Michigan, etc. Indiana will be red as its Pence's state, in addition to Ohio.
Overall, Trump needs to carry quite a few states in order to make a victory. Biden has quite a few options this time around.
More realistic than most of the high on hopium maps posted here.
Mason Foster
This is more accurate than most shifty map threads. Most faggots have nevada going red for some retard reason. Nevada never goes red for federal elections
Luke Adams
Yeah, I think I'm being generous by turning Wisconsin and Arizona blue, but its by a small margin.
I see maps posted that give Trump PA and a LOT of Rust Belt and Northeast states.
My map has Biden by winning about 30 electoral votes.
Owen Green
Biden is going to win FL. Trump won in 2016 here by 100k votes, since that time we have: -given 1.5 million+ felons (read: mostly shitskin democrats) the right to vote -taken in approximately 300k Puerto Ricans (read: shitskin democrats) in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria -had the usual annual influx of nonwhites as a result of the browning of the country Assuming that nothing else has changed (it has, enthusiasm for Trump is markedly less than it was in 2016) if 5-10% of this new constituency bothers to vote then it is over. FL is a lean blue state now, people denying this are either ignorant or lying. The Rust Belt and Arizona are a lot more in play than Florida is,
Without the hurricane and the felon voting issue I'd agree with you, but that's simply too much of a shift. Maybe if Biden accidentally says "nigger" or better yet "spic" on TV the state will stay Red, but otherwise it's gone.
>should convicted felons who have served their time permanently lose the ability to own guns? No, I think they should be able to own guns. My concern is primarily that I don't want them having any influence on politics, guns are a separate issue. >should convicted felons who have served their time for libel or obscenity laws permanently lose the ability to publish a book? Also no. If they write more libel or obscenity they should be arrested again, but their ability to publish should not be taken away.
This is about keeping people who have proven themselves to be either bad or retarded from influencing politics and society.
Justin Stewart
you cant pick and choose which rights to protect. voting is a right just like gun ownership or freedom of speech.
a convicted felon (especially if they are a violent one) owning guns that can be used to inflict harm on people is a way bigger risk to society than giving them the right to vote.
Jayden Allen
PA aint flippin
Wyatt Morgan
>you cant pick and choose which rights to protect Yes I absolutely can. What fucking planet do you come from? Just because the US won't ever likely do this doesn't mean it isn't a valid choice for a society to make.
"valid" choice =/= ideologically or legally consistent choice
when you complete your sentence, you have paid your debt to society.
the american revolution was partially started over the concept of no taxation without representation but you're happy to take that right away for someone who has paid their debts to the system?
if you believe that you're better off moving to iran, faggot
Michael Davis
Why?
Elijah James
>"valid" choice =/= ideologically or legally consistent choice You are assuming my ideology is strict American Constitutionalism, that is incorrect. >when you complete your sentence, you have paid your debt to society. That is irrelevant to my position, I do not believe in universal democracy, so even someone who has "paid their debt to society" does not automatically obtain the right to vote under my worldview. >the american revolution was partially started over the concept of no taxation without representation but you're happy to take that right away for someone who has paid their debts to the system? Yes. >if you believe that you're better off moving to iran, faggot Make me. This nation exists for the purpose of the advancement of the white race, not of fancy ideological nonsense. Take your liberalism and shove it.
