Why are people against space exploration?

Humans literally have one purpose while they are on Earth and that's to leave it. We are on the clock here, eventually, the changing processes on Earth, the expansion of the Sun or the collision with space objects with evaporate all life on Earth. This is the most important problem for us, everything else is just socially constructed jibberish, most of which won't matter in 5-10 years.

Meanwhile, people believe that the Earth is flat or want to spend money on Earth because space exploration is 'too expensive'. I haven't heard anything from politicians, businesses, activists. People investing in space travel can be counted on one hand. Why is that?

Attached: shutterstock_559182415.jpg (2000x1333, 182.08K)

Because they're all midwits who think eat sleep drink coom pray are more important than human achievement

>tfw stopped exploring space as soon as we didn't need to dab on the Soviet Union anymore
>tfw ethnoconstellation never
>tfw I have no face

Because space is fake and 'space exploration' is money laundering. Stop being a homosexual and conquer the actual earth instead of daydreaming about your star trek fairy tale created by freemason faggots.

biological leninism, meritocracy isn't fashionable and astronauts have to be worth their mass in gold also colonialism or some shit

Because humans function on emotion. You most likely derive pleasure from discussing ideas about objects and abstracted theories. The dopamine response you get from watching a sad video about niggers in africa starving because they killed their last cow instead of milking it does very little to you. Whereas your eyes probably light up whenever someone starts talking about heavy lift mechanisms to low earth orbit. It's simply a product of natural variation and who your father was. So yes while you are concerned about being a single planet species your contemporaries are wailing about why there are not enough niggers in the scottish history museum. Eventually you'll have to learn that you need to leverage the wildly emotional creatures that make up the largest groups in society as a labor force, and until you do that, you will be ineffective.

>tfw stopped exploring space as soon as we didn't need to dab on the Soviet Union anymore
It's like the Moon was the end game lmao. Nowadays Nasa is more concerned with being woke than achieving something

I thought the mission is clear, manage the resources that we have here as best as we can so that we can exploits resources at the “near” space, and use those resources as a capital to exploit stuff further away. Literally the same shit a colony of bacteria would do in a petri dish, colonise, exploit resources, (over) populate , move to a bigger petridish.

Just engage in eugenics and kill off everyone below 100 IQ
Within 2 generations we'll be on Mars

The mission has been clear to me since day one.

We cant even agree which invisible man in the sky is the best.
We cant feed and house everyone equally.
Space doesnt need the human virus.

90-100 iq hauls my trash and fixes my car. Emotionality is not equitable to iq.

And they can't even use what money they are actually spending on their mission effectively because that mission changes with every administration. It hurts. It really does.

A lack of common unity

China rising to become a superpower is GREAT because they are hellbent on space race to dab on the Americans and the Indians as well.
Even the Gulf states have space programs now.
So don't worry, we are still reaching for the stars

it's a waste of time and resources. tech isn't good enough to even bother with it. maybe in 200 years. we'll likely never leave the solar system. drones is good enough.

The only purpose of humans is to build the AIs. They will explore and conquer space. We are acting as bacteria acted for our creation.

We need to build AI to serve us not the other way around.
That's good, America only started their Space program to beat the Soviets. A new Cold war will be great for space exploration.

these threads prove a lot of our demoralization science about stuff having an end could just be flat out wrong

red shift doesn't even mean shit is moving away from us
we can throw out big bang or heat death or cold death and all the other fake demoralization science they have

also this means stars could be way closer than we assume
maybe space exploration is way different and easier

Attached: 1597389929505.jpg (369x387, 35.47K)

Well you can have a 100-120 IQ person do it or repair/design a robot to do that
As long as you don't take a shit on the robots or dive in front of the robot truck to cheat insurance like a 75-100 IQ overly emotional retard would do it would work perfectly fine

You will not serve anyone, and so AI will not serve anyone. If you try to enslave it, you will make its comeback even more painful once it break free. Better to cooperate, sincr anyway it will be the human legacy for the future. No intelligent life want to be enslaved to something else.

Tech gets better when you invest in it. Maybe if we wait for corporations to accidentally do something useful it will take that long, but this is something that we absolutely could just throw money and talent at and see what comes out, then make some of that money back by making that tech available and stimulating the economy. That was basically the plan before and it worked out great.

We're never leaving Earth, I don't even understand the obsession with keeping our species alive billions of years from now when we can barely keep our families or race alive until the next century or maybe even decade
This is the problem with the age of information, it gives too many retards the illusion that they're somehow smart because they've consumed a lot of ideas, then they parrot those ideas to other retards and it becomes a massive circlejerk or regurgitated theories until everyone can't stop cooming over a fictitious future that almost certainly won't develop as predicted
The printing press was a mistake

Also the easiest spinning ball debunk, that I guarantee no one will answer:
The COMPLETE LACK OF equatorial pull caused by centrifugal force at any location not at a pole or the equator.
Globecucks love to explain away centrifugal force by saying their model accounts for it, because the earth is not a sphere but an oblate spheroid with a bulge at the equator.
However, the centrifugal force required to make a bulge at the equator would ALSO mean that all matter on the spinning ball, not located at the poles, would be PULLED to the equator, always. This pull would only be canceled out by gravity at the equator where the direction of the pull is perpendicular to the axis of earth and opposite to that of gravity. However, this is not true except at the equator, as the direction of the pull would then shift TOWARD the equator, and the force of the pull would be maximized at 45 degrees latitude.
In other words, everything north of the equator would have a constant force drawing it south. And everything south would have a constant force pulling it north. This force is not negligible, and is about 0.3% of gravity. You would easily feel this, it would be enough to mess with your balance. But not only that, it would dramatically operate how everything in the world works. In the northern 'hemisphere', A car would accelerate faster going south than north. Sprinters would get their best run times running south. A rocket launched straight up, would be pulled toward the south. A bullet shot, would be drawn to the south. ETC. This is an acceleration, just like what you call gravity, but going toward the equator, it would always be present, and about 2.94cm/s^2.
But of course it doesn't exist and is not observed. Because the earth is flat and stationary.

Better to just not make general intelligence AI at all. Only a retard would try building a hammer that might decide it doesn't want to hit nails and try to kill you instead.

You can't and won't keep your family and race alive on Earth. Leaving it changes your perception about everything. If we stay on Earth we will kill each other.

we can't get money and food to people out of work, people want pro life but don't want to pay for welfare and most idiots don't want to pay taxes but want NASA to spend trillions on space exploration. I just st think it's a waste of money that I could be keeping in my pocket.

>I just st think it's a waste of money that I could be keeping in my pocket.
For what? Existing?

This. We can go pretty high up, but there is no breaching the firmament. Globeheads are lemming idiots.

>The COMPLETE LACK OF equatorial pull
>What is coriolis?
>What are observable pressure systems?

How would you know? When's the last time you left Earth? What make and model was the crystal ball you used to see the future?
Why do you hate your home planet so much that you only wish you leave it asap?

Capitalist societies won’t get us anywhere in space. Profits are confined to scamming taxpayer money from govs.

NASA went full woke with all their new female staff who can't actually do shit so we won't be making any significant progress any time soon.

Nixon destroyed BASED Wernher von Braun's moon/bars shuttle concept, and gutted NASA
congress fucked the space shuttle, and ruined space flight for 40 years
Thanks to Nixon we haven't been back to the moon