Do you know how to draw, Zig Forums? And do you do that as a weak white boi or as a strong black woman?

Fuck it. Some drawfag can improve this drivel

Attached: 20200817_181609.jpg (4128x2322, 2.36M)

Jesus you are terrible. This is south park tier bullshit. Its okay though since you do it for fun as you have stated before

2nd one. Im aiming to be picked up by marvel by ep 3
Cant do that without an origin story

Attached: 20200818_184125.jpg (4128x3096, 2.81M)

Pay debnts faggot, then well talk

It's actually shocking how bad i am at drawing.

>Antiwhite meme-pathogen depicted on the cover: "nonwhites are more effective workers than whites / whites are ineffective workers"
found the crybaby seeing things

Asians are shit at art. Whites create, asians copy.

there’ve been good black comic book artists but literally no good black female ones

Attached: 98F875B6-E040-4718-8A82-9EB513635A4B.jpg (2828x1203, 998.97K)

i don't draw, that's for pussys, i sculpt.

Attached: 1587348429314.jpg (522x785, 42.38K)

when you sculpt the statue of a guy you are literally touching his penis with your hands, seems very gay desu

(((Willberg)))

rage comics were the ultimate expression of white males distilled to its purest form before the internet became pozzed

Attached: 8636948E-8341-4DE9-8D28-6C57E1250FB0.jpg (525x716, 78.69K)

Hello, antiwhite. I assume you're of the opinion that artists *don't* use their symbols intentionally in their art?

not if you're sculpting the pants instead of the naked legs you retardo

The messy creator on the left will still be better than the clean one on the right.

>I assume
you assume wrong, because you are a schizo retard
>B-BUT ARTISTS USE THEIR SYMBOLS INTENTIONALLY
yes my dear brainlet, now can you tell me what their intent was?
>a-anti white!!
how do you know the artist's intent? have you asked them? oh nonono, you are just viewing their art with your distorted view of reality so you just give arbitrary interpretations thinking that you have it all figured out.
Come on buddy, the book has the artist's name in the credits, go ask them :) I bet you won't, because asking is too feminine to do, instead it's better to jump at racially-charged conclusions

I like how you talk as if you hold some sort of authority over the correctness of my (fairly straightforward) interpretation, or any other interpretations. I also appreciate your blatant hostility, and attacks on my character and presumed mental illness; it amuses me.
My hypothesis is as such:
Take these straightforward observations:
>look at the white guy, he's doing it wrong. He's inept, and suffering for it.
>look at the nonwhite, she's doing it right. She's got it figured out.
Now, I draw the conclusion that the artist is sending a message that "nonwhites are more effective workers than whites / whites are ineffective workers."

Now, instead of attacking me by calling me stupid, would you care to explain an alternative hypothesis?

Note as well, that if you reversed the positions of the characters in the cover, the art would be attacked for being "racist" (an antiwhite slur).

I can't believe this wasn't the first post of the thread

Rate my non-resized shit art

Attached: 1597743695081.png (1080x1770, 416.74K)

>Cartoonists
>having actual artistic skill

Web/political comics are the literal bottom of the barrel of the art world. Any child with downs and parkinson who can hold a pen the right way can shit out a comic and call himself a 'cartoonist' (see xkcd)

Cute/10

Attached: E7A24B5D-105A-4E33-BFCD-996ED31B473C.jpg (225x225, 4.98K)

Post that pdf if you're so great.

Miss me with this gay shit. I don't draw faggot drawings, I plot blueprints and not less.