Why are you so obsessed with some sexual practices? Why are you so opposed to polyamourous relations...

gnosticism, thats why

It hurts plenty you faggot.

Attached: 25339711-AEAE-4A09-93DB-3E720E0C6617.jpg (1024x1000, 103.41K)

It's a good video indeed, thanks.

Yup, I know many poly couples who are fine. But I'm sure you consider the good old days when married dudes were scewing around behind their wives back were so much better...

It always starts with "I just wanna be me" and ends with "I want your kids to be like me (by law)".
It's been proven that dialog and tolerance lead to nowhere good. We're animals, after all, and we created a system where the wickest and most dysfunctional people that wouldn't be able to survive a week without said system get a chance to thrive and impose their wickedness on other people.

>It's been proven that dialog and tolerance lead to nowhere good.
Huh...no.

thanks for another absolutely abhorrent thread with god awful opinions i dont give a shit about. your nation is dead, your civilization is dead. bookmark this post, i dont care about your feelings or arguments. you are wrong, and you will live long enough to watch the world around you crumble. but don't worry, you'll never admit to yourself you were wrong. at least your grandchildren will speak about you and your generation as though you were satanists.

You should probably not get the entirety of your history reference from Mad Men.

How about poly couples with kids. Know any of those? I'm sure they're putting all the time and resources they can in to raising kids.

>How about poly couples with kids. Know any of those?
Yes.
theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/09/how-build-three-parent-family-david-jay/616421/

I don't understand why you prudes think you're
so superior. I can fuck both my wife and your mom

>asexual
>three year old relationship
Lol, he's a nanny. I'm sure he'll stick around.

Fucking is easy. Maintaining a family, the foundation of civilization, is not easy, and your autistic distractions are not helping society.

Civilisation is based on sexual repression, OP. When you institutionalise sex, procreation and relationships, society can employ it’s energy in creative and productive endeavours. Ya see, every single time in history when those institutions were demolished to facilitate sexual liberation, the correlated societies collapsed within a generation or two. Egypt, Babylon, Greece, Rome, China etc. They all embraced deviance in their later years. As such, competitors more focused in warfare, trade and organisation outpaced the states too preoccupied with dicksucking. We are living in the decline of our respective civilisations. If we do not pull out, figuratively and literally, we’d follow the above mentioned examples. So yes, caring about other peoples bedside manners is imperative to ensure the continuation of ones way of life.

sexual liberation always leads to disaster. this phenomenon always pops up when civilization goes downhill (rome, ancient greece, so on)

also read oswald spenglers "the decline of the west" and julius evolas "revolt against the modern world"

It's vapid. Has no chance of creating a self replacing society. I unironically support this for leftists as it makes sure they won't breed.

based

Attached: based dep.jpg (410x598, 39.54K)

This is the core point. Leftists should be allowed to voluntarily end their bloodlines. Society will suffer in the meantime, but the only upside to the sexual revolution is that we're drawing out centuries of repressed gay shit.

>Are you that insecure?
The most commonly used insult on this board is 'cuck', sooooooooo... I mean, do the math.

Neck yourself, Ismail!

>It doesn't hurt anyone.

Wrong. It hurts the practicing of monogamy and places excessive costs on the society at the genetic level
You are stealing from productive K-groups and giving them to unproductive R-groups.

Non-monogamy is a violation of the social contract because you are asking people to support non-kin without giving them anything in return.

Leftism is the denial of the reality of the Law of Competitive Exclusion which is the basis for national selection. By claiming that all groups are equal you enforcing R-selection on all groups relying on K-Selection and transferring resources from high investment parents and giving those resources to low investment parents which robs the populations of the incentive to have high investment in parenting aka you are forcing your degeneracy on everyone at the point of a gun.

In short, you are trying to stop natural selection i.e. humanities ability to adapt by not allowing for some groups to compete and forcing the sharing resources regardless the difference of costs to gain said resources.
Polyamory is genetic communism and you've now hurt the fitness of everyone because without costs to defective genetics and behaviors related said genes you destroy the ability of humanity to evolve.

It hurts them and it hurts all of us