POWERFUL

Hate to tell you this but this is all by design. The left accelerates ideas and the right manages them with incremental legislation.

There is literally nothing wrong with women engaged in politics. I wonder how many of the posters in this thread have a BMI below 30

2 more seats will open up by 2024

It's about exposing the lefts true nature, keep seething you nigger loving faggot

Attached: SHUT-THE-FUCK-UP-NIGGER-G9FDGUJ.png (1033x663, 795.24K)

This.

It’s pretty sad we can’t nominate a man to replace Ginsburg because the Dems will pay some cat lady to tell a story about how she was indelibly raped in her hippocampus.

It’s not that, per se. It’s that liberals have managed to force it such that a man could not replace Ginsburg. We’re buying into their frame.

That said, I care waaaaaaay more about her views than her gender/race. Clarence Thomas is one of the best judges.

>There is literally nothing wrong with women engaged in politics
he says as women vote to replace the population with the 3rd world because "they deserve a better life" go fuck yourself

tiredofwining.jpg

Attached: 1595204048673.png (625x300, 182.9K)

another sponsored thread.

Attached: trump has no real support.png (1806x1660, 1.9M)

God I fucking hate how both sides pander to women. Honestly I just wish Pisslam would take over, at least we wouldn’t get universal gynocracy

What the fuck are you talking about?

Women are not mentally fit for positions of power. They are too easily influenced and co-opted by exogenous bad actors. They are also averse to cooperation, especially with other women. They are also overly empathetic making them unfit to make sound decisions for large groups of people, which often involve sacrifice. You are a virgin if you dont understand women well enough to know these things. You may have fucked some but youve never really known a woman.

i fucking hate this crypto jew faggot kirk.

this

pandering to Christian fundamentalists sometimes and occasionally playing with tax rates does not make a party right wing

remember when conservatives wanted to actually conserve things? like traditional gender roles?

Would be amazing if he nominated a tranny, like, someone who doesn't even attempt to pass, just a manly buff 6'5" dude who doesn't shave, wears a wig and a skirt. The left wouldn't be able to formulate any criticism of that person.

they will shoot down the woman nominee and get stuck with the 2nd string which will be a man probably latino

Chequed
Zig Forums:
We wuz kangz
We wuz jooz
We wuz libs
We iz faggots

Start a Fascist party

Charlie Kirk is King Faggot.

/thread

FPBP. Pandering/compromising isn't conservativism.
Conservatives = preserve what's good.
Liberals = change what's good to be something else.

ANY "meeting in the middle" or "compromise" is a losing position if your objective is not to change.
The notion of "compromise" is a fucking scam, same for "optics" and "politics."

The matriarchy is here boys. Only women will be the chosen "safe" candidate from now on. Useful men will just occupy a token position.
Are you tired of winning yet?

FUCK WOMYN

We did. Tara reade quickly caused the dems to stfu about “believing (all) women” and has been memory holed faster than the Vegas shooter.