Cah Boi

this

I don’t know about that, France, Sweden & the UK are pretty washed.

what the fuck, has he commented on this?

Thanks friend

>White Europeans are at the mercy of any white county with guns which are usually composed of emasculated fat mutts who bend to niggers
Yes, he's completely right

1. It is impossible for color to be collective identity. Therefore there is nothing to be gained. Trying to appropriate an identity only invented to implement Affirmative Action policy is not one that will organize a people as a nation? An identity that pre-determines what people are, that does not include in that process people giving it that meaning, is not an identity people can use to determine a nation. This is why they name you what they name you.

Attached: Symbol of Forbidden Existence-2.jpg (630x1042, 363.19K)

2. The use of color to represent shared cognitive states prevents collective identity from forming. Color is isolated to the experience of individual perception. The cause of the common relationships people share is the same truth obtained by consensus, and also the same cause of the differences we recognize in others. But the cause of those differences is not the differences themselves represented by the color isolated to the perception of individuals. It is not difference that makes a difference which is a cause that has the ability to act as a cause. Collective Identity is what makes that difference different. It represents the cause of that difference in others, that is also the cause of the relationship we share for meaningful purpose. If there is no meaningful purpose, there is no cause for a relationship. Difference cannot bring itself into existence, because difference is not existence. We are the difference we make.

Attached: The map is not the territory_.jpg (800x976, 510.7K)

3. Color identity does not appeal to the people it claims to represent. Majority of people who the white color represents, particularly those who still reside on the continent of Europe, have never and will never adopt color as collective identity. Most find it strange and unusual to say the least. Anyone with an IQ above 90 instinctively rejects color as collective identity. There has never been and never will be a color nation for reasons stated here. Americans did not declare their independence from king George as the white color, therefor political action which requires individuals cooperating for cultural and ethnic interests will not succeed by color identity.

Attached: Deconstructing-Hierarchy8.png (854x2562, 1.72M)

4. Color identity is a cattle tag. Color identity represents the shared cognitive state of subjects being subjected to the commands of others. When a descriptive/non-descriptive reference is adopted as identity, it can only result in the reciprocal action for the purpose of who is naming you. Color is unique in that it can only represent a descriptive reference, because people do not share experience of color, and therefore it is impossible for color to represent objective relationships shared between a common people. Whoever has that power to condition the minds of people own its meaning, and they own you when you consent to that name. You are controlled by whoever controls the meaning of that color. This is why they chose this name for you.

Attached: morality and law of names.png (1100x800, 578.28K)

5. Adopting Color identity is consenting to libel. Institutions are failing due to failed policy and the people who depend on them need a scapegoat for the problems they have created. The jews and/or urbanites who depend on these failing institutions are scapegoating themselves and using their wealth and status to evade repercussions. By consenting to their scapegoat, you prevent these problems from being recognized as problems, prevent your ability to hold them accountable, and become the cause of everyone's suffering. You might as well just name yourselves "Everyone's Criminal" or "The Cause of Everyone's Problems", because that is what it means when you consent to their names. The ADL is your shepherd and the cost for their service is your dignified existence (MSRP, no refunds).

Attached: You did it_.png (1080x2211, 1.21M)

6. What name you compel the other to identify you as possess strategical value. The other does not speak your language, and they are limited in their ability to empathize on your behalf. Anti-whiteness requires people who use color to identify themselves. By naming grievances as "anti-white", you name yourself as the cause of your own problems by adopting a name that cannot establish causation. This is a Talmudic trick disguised as a solution being marketed for free! Color identity is a mimetic virus. Michael Hoffman describes how this practice is carried out in detail in his book, 'Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare' (pic related)

Attached: Exposing or Promoting.png (900x506, 336.96K)

Is that nick?

>color

Of course not, these are just general symbolic terms referencing genetic in-groups with highly distinct distributions of genetic material. “White” is a stand-in for “Indigenous European peoples and their descendants”. “White” doesn’t refer to pale Koreans, and “black” doesn’t refer to dark Bangladeshis.

THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF WHITEFAGS.

The least violent regions of USA, Switzerland, lots of first world countries are in the top 40 with the biggest amount of guns per person:

military.wikia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

Most people don't give a fuck and use guns only for sport or protecting themselves from niggers and wiggers.
Loud jews and dumb normies never discuss the kind of person who usually shoots other people with guns (feral subhumans and sociopaths).

>what do u think ab this unironic faggots opinion
i dont

DAILY REMINDER CATBOYKAMI IS GAY!!! READ IT ON LAST 2 THREADS!! ON KIWIFARMS

He's Nick Fuentes's guy-friend.

We might have the most jewish tricks per capita, but at least we don't welcome rapefugees with open arms. Our biggest problem now is dealing with ingrate we wuzes that were sold by the actual kangz.

>Of course not, these are just general symbolic terms referencing genetic in-groups with highly distinct distributions of genetic material. “White” is a stand-in for “Indigenous European peoples and their descendants”. “White” doesn’t refer to pale Koreans, and “black” doesn’t refer to dark Bangladeshis.
wrong. Color cannot be symbolized. This is the problem with color identity. You can project whatever you want onto it and everyone will do the same. Color itself cannot represent meaning

I have guns

Transniggers are the most hated people on the planet. Only posting a photo of them here gets the thread archived.

Attached: Ares_4.jpg (1000x534, 40.79K)

Your language isn't clear or expressive enough to get your point across.

Uhh bros?