>THE BILL IS EXPECTED TO PASS CONGRESS THE BILL IS EXPECTED TO PASS CONGRESS >THE BILL IS EXPECTED TO PASS CONGRESS THE BILL IS EXPECTED TO PASS CONGRESS >THE BILL IS EXPECTED TO PASS CONGRESS
Continued from Today, on behalf of the Trump Administration, the Department of Justice sent draft legislation to Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The draft legislative text implements reforms that the Department of Justice deemed necessary in its June Recommendations and follows a yearlong review of the outdated statute. The legislation also executes President Trump’s directive from the Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship.
The Justice Department on Wednesday proposed new law to reform a key legal liability shield for the tech industry, known as Section 230.The bill, which is expected to pass Congress, focuses on two areas of reform.
I have to wonder what implications this will have for their algorithms they use to share content between users. As it wouldn't be blatant censorship but soft.
Assuming this isn't a trojan horse to further rape and censor us somehow.
let me be clear it looks to me like a direct SHITTING ON of twitter and facebook they don't censor Zig Forums, that's the job of faggot rogue jannies and mods
anyone who tweets a threat at the president can result in a fine against twitter. Massive censorship starts, only time charges and fines being brought up will be when the threats are directed to specific people. > Immigrants who commit this crime can be deported.[6] Y'all know that this is just a way to enforce propaganda right?
Jason Davis
"Department of justice"
Landon Foster
>not being able to threaten the President is propaganda Shut up dog fucker
Jaxon Brooks
Yeah, I get that and the part about censorship I was talking about is indirect censorship people may not be aware of.
Delete the message/tweet/account yeah people see that.
Preventing people from seeing content based off of algorithm you can't see but is in the code or can be manipulated is still censorship but not visible.
Listen up you stupid little bitches. That wasn't an anti trump post. It will be used to protect whatever government is in power. Likely Biden next year. They will be able to spin the narrative in any course. You little clown boy fucks.
Benjamin Cox
>muh MSM KYS tho seriously! there's a reason you're in snownigger land not going to happen
Blake Edwards
please please please let this happen i want to leave we need to leave all of us will spread farther and faster than covid pretended to.
Ryder Perry
I'm honestly so fucking glad I'll be able to witness the collapse of the United States in my lifetime. Fucking blessed.
>Nor should a platform receive blanket immunity for continuing to host known criminal content on its services, despite repeated pleas from victims to take action.
We know what that's aimed at. I guess pornhub's gonna get fucked, as well it should
Jacob Lewis
How? We don't host illegal content, we don't threaten the life of the president, and anons are generally on their best behavior. There's not much to be afraid of.
Anthony Murphy
TRUMP AND BARR PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT IT TRUMP AND BARR PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT IT TRUMP AND BARR PRESS CONFERENCE ABOUT IT
The video is chopped up, starts with questions then restarts @ 4:54
>not realising a lefty could make one post and get the whole site shutdown The only job of section 230 is putting the blame for people personal actions on themselves not the site that hosts them. We don't deserve 230 if people are this retarded
Nathaniel Stewart
>not realising a lefty could make one post and get the whole site shutdown No, if the site takes it down than it's still a good faith website. If Zig Forums had a hundred lefties a day making threats against the president and did nothing to take it down, or banned people who criticized it (twatter) that's different. This new 230 makes the distinction between sites who get raided and sites that just don't do anything about shitbirds doing illegal shit.
Sebastian Hill
>let me be clear >it looks to me like a direct SHITTING ON of twitter and facebook >they don't censor Zig Forums, that's the job of faggot rogue jannies and mods Re-read the "exclusion from "Good Samaritan" bit again, but this time think about someone bringing an anti-hate crime lawsuit against NotMoot because of what someone posted in pol.
Landon Thomas
say goodbye to the internet as you've ever known it. only the usual suspect (((international finance backed multinational megacorps))) will be able to afford to operate online, after this. there will be no 'public forums', accessible to all. fully kiked internet = shopping mall, and that's what this will create.
you dumb cunts keep falling for the 'political outsider' meme and fucked is what you will always get. don't ever vote a candidate that doesn't name them, ever again. much less any that ARE them.
Cooper Hughes
No they can still fuck the website since guess what that data was still sent over the internet to people computers. They can also fuck the website for not having "algorithms" that doesn't detect it. Even if the mods delete that shit it's still hosted somewhere.
