>first in space
>developed most important computer science used today such as Etherium
>biggest land mass in human history
>hate niggers
>will inherit the future as The Western World colllapses
Slavs are the best of whites
Other urls found in this thread:
debatingeurope.eu
spiegel.de
youtube.com
spectator.sme.sk
praguemonitor.com
theguardian.com
ucis.pitt.edu
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
twitter.com
Based, finally a futurism thread that doesn't consider half human sacrificer half sandnigger beaners as the future dominators
No shit, stop being brainwashed by Judaic American cold war propaganda, wake up nigger loving westoid
Communism always ends in an evil and ugly Orwellian dystopia. I hope you're larping
Cringe, idiot clearly took all his history from an English history book
Most of Russia is inhabited by mongols. They also have millions of muslims. All these based russian myth are nothing but myths. They are only boomer tier conservative aat most aka jews are the chosen ones and all christians are equal.....
Dude, you have millions of muslims too. And yours are shit skins as well.
Also, Russians hate jews because of how well off they were after the revolution.
From my parents. And I can clearly tell your family were the ones sending innocent people to death camps, comrade.
t. subhumanowski
germans were the first in space retard
I have always admired Slavs. It's a shame that today though they are too drunk to co-operate with us Westerners and BTFO the jew/chink forever.
>germans were the first in space retard
No, it was the Slavs who sent the first human to space fagot
to which period of communism are you referring to?
"Just today I spoke with the former Hungarian Foreign Minister, Géza Jeszenszky, about this, and he quite succinctly summed up what was the problem.
[...] many people in the 1970s and ’80s did not feel they were suffering so much from oppression, were not afraid of going to jail, being tortured or locked up. There was a certain amount of free enterprise on a very small scale. You could travel to foreign countries – not necessarily to Western countries, but to places like Egypt. Schooling was free, university was free, healthcare was free, everyone got to go on summer vacation for very little money, jobs were secure.
So, when the system changed, everyone wanted it, of course, but the expectation was not so much that there would be more freedom – of course, that was very welcome – but the expectation was greater well-being, greater prosperity, more money, better jobs. And, to this day, that hasn’t really happened. Instead, what they got was greater insecurity; nobody is really sure where they will work next year, if they will work [...]."
German-Hungarian journalist and author Boris Kálnoky, who works as a foreign correspondent for various media (including Die Welt and Deutsche Welle)
debatingeurope.eu
more than half of former eastern Germans defend the GDR.
"From today's perspective, I believe that we were driven out of paradise when the Wall came down," one person writes, and a 38-year-old man "thanks God" that he was able to experience living in the GDR, noting that it wasn't until after German reunification that he witnessed people who feared for their existence, beggars and homeless people.
Today's Germany is described as a "slave state" and a "dictatorship of capital," and some letter writers reject Germany for being, in their opinion, too capitalist or dictatorial, and certainly not democratic.
Positive ideas still prevail among Slovakia's population when assessing communism, a poll carried out by Focus agency for the M.R. Štefánik Conservative Institute found.
People mostly prefer a strong welfare state and do not trust market solutions, the TASR newswire cited the poll’s results on June 25.
79 percent asserted that people lived in a safer environment during socialism and that violent crimes were less frequent. Another 77 percent claimed that thanks to the planned economy, there was enough useful work for all and therefore no unemployment.
spectator.sme.sk
Czech society feeling nostalgia for Communism
Not everything was bad in the past regime, while the new one also has serious mistakes. This view is mostly expressed by those who really lived to see the previous regime, Mlejnek writes.
The Czech Republic is facing a remarkable paradox. Czechs are living in the most prosperous era of their history, but also in an era burdened with frustration and fear, Mlejnek writes.
There is no silent majority. However, there is a majority stressed by the social and economic pressure on performance, the fight for a higher place on the social ladder, the fear of a disease, an unpaid mortgage and lately also of the flood of Muslim migrants, he adds.
praguemonitor.com
The Czech transformation from state socialism to capitalism is often considered a success, and today all the economic indicators suggest the country is thriving. But subjective experiences tell a different story. The individual narratives of those in need aren’t presented as systematic problems of an entire society. The achievements of the welfare state were often seen as interchangeable with communism, and trade unions were mocked as relics of the old regime. For years, collective bargaining was practically a swearword. So it became quite common for low wages to be accompanied by blatant violations of the labour code, which employees put up with for fear of speaking up. With the endless repetitions of “everyone’s out for themselves”, Czech society gave up on solidarity.
In recent years liberal elites began telling people they ought to show solidarity with refugees.
theguardian.com
Citizens’ negative assessment of their current government relative to the Soviet one
might come as a surprise to outsiders. Over the years foreign politicians, journalists, and
scholars, particularly those in the West, have portrayed Soviet governance foremost as
oppressive rule. The term “evil empire” became part of the Cold War political rhetoric in the
U.S.; with greater openness, or glasnost, in the late Soviet era the Western media reported on
revelations about the purges under Joseph Stalin; and, today, in the post-Soviet period, professors
continue to introduce their students to the totalitarian model, which attributed to the Soviet
Union a “terroristic” police, communications monopoly, and pervasive state ideology, among
other features. Yet, citizens of post-Soviet countries do not remember only the limited political
freedoms and episodic terror of the Soviet era. In fact, many cast the Soviet period in a positive
light and even view Soviet rule as superior to current governance.
Slovenians generally described their life in Yugoslavia as “good”
and “very good” (86.1 to 88.2 per cent); only 5.2 to 7 per cent
called it “bad” or “very bad” (Toš et al. 1999: 565, 872; Toš et al.
2004: 474).
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
What the hell are you doing? Can you read?
Oh it's the german I debunked 19 times in a row kek
still waiting for you to debunk anything giacomo because you clearly never have pasta fag
...because of Nazi tech...
Anyone can fire a gun in the air.
Communism is popular because it caters to idiots. You push a broom 8 hours a day and you get a state issued apartment, a car, appliances, everything (all of which of poor quality) while a doctor or an engineer gets the same exact stuff. There's no way to progress in life. You say one bad word, you go to prison. So no wonder half the population still misses "the good old times". If you don't see a problem here I'm truly sorry for you.
> we have an idea for a rocket
> it might work, but it might blow up.
> hmm... better strap the slav on top for the first few
slav first in space.
never said communism was a utopia just pointing out that in many former socialist countries in fact a significant portion if not a majority of the population assesses communism/many aspects of it favourably
nice picture
Slavs weren't even white a bit over a century ago and are only considered white today because Anglo Americans needed more pale skinned people to boost their voter bases, then spread their racial ideology around the world since America was rising a lot at the same time. The sooner you move past race, the better.
Orwell was a socialist, who then moved more toward social democracy. I'm not sure how you can take "Orwellian nightmare" to describe the kinds of societies Orwell wanted.
If course they do, because they can just chill and live off the work of other people. Wouldn't you like to be a garbageman and make the same as a doctor? But the problem is you then end up with millions of garbagemen. There's no initiative to do anything in communism, you can't own a business, you can't progress.