”shall not”

”shall not”

Attached: 3F92BF5B-8412-4A3F-AAB9-3BC1B2255466.jpg (625x605, 237.78K)

lol it's really true that the left can't meme. must be genetic or something. lol actually pretty funny

The constitution should be interpreted as written but the entire reason we have a judicialbranch is to do that interpretation and fill in the gaps where the academic theory of law must be applied to the practical circumstances of reality

How fast is a speedy trial? You can't be this dumb.
As fast as possible. You fucking idiots.

it's pretty fucking obvious when shady shit is afoot with speedy trials, doesn't take an expert

It’s three days

What trial are they referring to exactly? Chauvin? Rittenhouse? Who? Be specific!

>Hmmm this one section is vague, better throw the whole document out. Give up your guns, goys.

not funny, didn't laugh

i hate to forsake the blessed one of Zig Forums but hitler took away guns. one of the worse things he did really.

And Karl Marx said to never disarm the workers.
What’s your point, Commie?

they arent wrong in that the constitution was written before things like metapolitics and psychology were invented. Back then nobody even questioned what a word specifically meant, but now we do.

Thats fine though. We can just revise the meaning of the constitution to mean things like jews are people.

what are they holding and why

The left are either focused on greed or envy-based vices (95% of them) or intellectual ideas that don't correspond to an emotion we've evolved to have yet, such as strictly conscious thought (5% of them).

The former gains no traction because it's nothing more than an infantile whine.

The latter never gains traction because there are no emotions available to hook into.

that is why the left can't meme.

wtf i like vigilante justice now

Lawyer here
>no im not Jewish you faggot
The 2nd gives you right to "a gun" not any kind you want

This is a hard fact for pol to swallow but even really pro 2nd layer and scholars agree

>public can keep & bear arms

>keep=store
>bear=use
>arms=weapons

>anything can be used as a weapon (john wick and his pencil, riddick and his teacup)
>weapons are legal, all things are legal
>some chemicals and contraptions are more leathal than others (nukes, sarin gas)
>constitution says weapons are legal to store and use

>an american citizen as per magic paper is within his rights to own and use anything and everything on earth, laws againts nuke ownership, laws regulating lisencing for military vehicles are all unconstitutional

If this not the case, burn the entire document at once. Rewrite it as the bill of needs

Attached: IMG_4050.jpg (827x628, 84.93K)

You’re not a lawyer

>The 2nd gives you right to "a gun" not any kind you want

Even me as a norcuck knows that the 2nd gives americans in indirect words the ability to arm themselves, as a functioning militia.

What guns are needed are those that is sufficient to arm themselves towards an internal or external threat.

>shall not
>speedy
If you can't tell which one of these is a relative term and which one is absolute you are completely retarded.

>i hate to forsake the blessed one of Zig Forums but hitler took away guns
>When the Third Reich gained power, some aspects of gun regulation were loosened, such as allowing firearm ownership for Nazi party members and the military. Nazi laws systematically disarmed "unreliable" persons, especially Jews, but relaxed restrictions for so-called "ordinary" German citizens.

he needed them to kill 78 million jews

communism is worse then hitler by FAR. my point is to laugh at you for ignoring hitler's taking freedoms away from white people.

"Speedy" trial - is the one, that does not take any unnecessary time to conclude the case. If you want specifics - you should become a judge and than, from your personal experience - you will know specific time frames for each type of case.

if that's true then fuck yeah sounds like my guy

i really wish

Where did this idea come from that a judge can just make shit up and ignore what is actually written in the Constitution?

All these old documents must be read within the context of 1700s diction.

i'm sure it would have been restored once his country was only white people again.

Where is the word "gun"? Reminder the coordinated kike maneuver of released shitty 80s movies with martial arts weapons and then banning all of them is unconstitutional as well but no one ever talks about it. The FCC has been shutting on the first amendment for 100 years and nobody talks about it. People act like we just started getting fucking 10 years ago and then when /k/ says to legalize machine guns every boomer retard goes WELL HOLD ON NOW I DIDNT HAVE A MACHINE GUN SONNY JIM

>or intellectual ideas that don't correspond to an emotion we've evolved to have yet, such as strictly conscious thought (5% of them).
what are you referring to?
ultra-left / situationist stuff?

As fast as the system can decide any equivalent case whats complicated

Except he only took them from jews and other undesireables

Sounds like academic-deductive left

There is a difference between defining speedy and selectively cramming the bill of rights into the due process clause of the 14th amendment. Moreover there is a difference between defining gun and discovering that the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th amendments magically are substantive in nature with all sort of hidden liberal goodies buried inside them.

As quick as possible, faggot. Theres a reason they used vague wording. They couldn't foretell what the future held, and knew that length of time would vary based on how burdened the courts were.
For the 2nd amendment, they used very specific wording, because they knew the right to bear arms should always be right at the same level as the government.
The faggot cock sucking government overstepped their bounds, and changed that.

the real redpill is that written constitutions are a fraud, only unwritten constitutions matter.

Where’s the punchline?

/thread

bear means carry but yeah