Read the law, Drumphkins

Republicans had the chance and chose not to do it

Section 230 of the of the CDA literally makes no distinction and says the company MUST engage in responsible moderation to avoid civil liability. I consider myself on the right but republicans are just fucking retarded mongoloids. Publisher vs platform is a false dichotomy invented by retarded kikes like Ben Shapiro to win petty arguments, it holds no water in court which is why the right keeps getting fucked in the ass by tech companies and lose lawsuits, like PragerU did. It should have been changed a long time ago but the GOP chose not to even though this publisher vs platform meme has been around for years and they knew it held no legal power

They are get away with financial fraud, illegal spying, censorship, mass human experimentation... the talking point of those kikes are mutual masturbation.

ATT cant ban your phone service for saying niggers smell like shit. This is what FB et al think they CAN do. No... anyway, the law is clear and sec 230 prots are about to be.. revoked. seethe tranny

Attached: 1599071443954.webm (1920x1080, 1.42M)

Cool good luck getting the house vote

Attached: A0585C84-F977-4AEC-882C-C3BB798265E8.jpg (640x640, 69.13K)

>Publisher vs platform is a false dichotomy invented by retarded kikes like Ben Shapiro to win petty arguments, it holds no water in court which is why the right keeps getting fucked in the ass by tech companies and lose lawsuits, like PragerU did. It should have been changed a long time ago but the GOP chose not to even though this publisher vs platform meme has been around for years and they knew it held no legal power
it is so fucking annoying. you can quote the text and show people but they just don't fucking accept it, and noone is able to take the evidence and change their minds

Remember when this guy was supposed to be based? What a faggot

Clearly you don’t understand the fundamental difference between Laws and Regulations. FCC is a regulatory agency.

What you gonna do? Take it up to the Supreme Court?

Attached: 090DDBDE-7DB6-4921-98CA-11F84AFFB2C8.jpg (720x1280, 113.23K)

You don’t need a house vote tard. It’s a regulation. Not a law.

Laws= Congress
Regulation= executive branch agency

>responsible moderation
They are curating content and indiscriminately censoring content. They pick and choose what gets published on their site, yet are free from consequences. Wapo got sued for libel. Wapo is Twitter's go to source for info. Twitter repeats and magnifies wapo's lies, yet they are immune. Do you see where the problem comes from? They can propagate lies, libel and slander with immunity

Is there a more revolting sell-out in history than this cryptosandnigger?
The dude was a libertarian who turned into a fucking neoliberal globohomo kike shill

>They can propagate lies, libel and slander with immunity
And as it stands, due the vague phrasing, it's totally allowed. Otherwise Prager U would have successfully sued google/youtube. The law NEEDS TO BE CHANGED, but the retarded, inbred GOP grannies in Congress probably don't even know what the law is let alone care about it. Hell, they could've even joined hands with some of the democrats and started breaking up tech giants years ago.

Attached: twitter.jpg (1337x1753, 234.97K)

Then the faggot I was replying to shouldn’t have used the word law

Ok, fine. Then twitter and facebook need to be entirely removed form anything in the least bit political. Either stay out of it, or be labelled what they are, a leftist manipulation tool. How is the law on the right side btw. There will come a time, probably very, very soon, when you scream like a faggot over their behavior, but you are too arrogant to see it.

>open a rule making process
That will never finish before the election, but it will turn the media against trump

So whats the modest moderation they are doing, blocking some of the largest newpapers posts because they dont like whats in the news? So when are they gonna get sued for doxxing, libel or defamation?

Someone please link the law

what, you didn't think he was actually making a good faith argument did you?

Mqybe you should not defend shit you dont know about shill?

>good luck getting the house vote
wont need it after the resignations and sudden onset terminal illnesses

the great irony here of course is that conservative judges (assuming they are true to their word, and not just a bunch of shills) would side with big tech since they are private, should something like hit the supreme court