Did they really commit atrocities or were they just anti-partisan group? Would appreciate links/books.
Redpill me on Einsatzgruppen
Partisans are fucking retards. The Allies would've done the same thing as these dudes if partisans kept blowing up their soldiers and equipment
They have been debunked by numerous sources
Probably but the atrocities of antiquity make them look extremely amateurish, they even look amateurish when compared against the atrocities of Africa and Indonesia in just the last 60 years.
Anyways, who gives a shit. What one small group of poeple die 80 years ago shouldn't affect our world much.
Here is a link to the Einsatzgruppen reports from the eastern front.
collections.arolsen-archives.org
Some of them are translated here
holocaustresearchproject.org
>Did they really commit atrocities or were they just anti-partisan group?
Sounds like you already know they were the latter.
>Would appreciate links/books.
This is the definitive work:
holocausthandbooks.com
No, their supposed atrocities were committed by NKVD officials who wore Waffen-SS uniforms whilst massacring civilians in Eastern Europe and photographing themselves in order to blame the Germans for war crimes so that Stalin could be perceived as the great liberator when he planned to invade continental Europe. He had planned to invade all the way over to the English channel to establish a Eurasian Bolshevik superstate.
They didnt care about partisans or were scared to fight them deep in the woods, what they did was to kill entire villages so that the partisans didnt have a political base . You should read your own history, your people lost 20% of its population due to nazi war crimes
Yes, but pretty much every country liquidated potential partisans during conquest.
That's why they HAVE to push the holocaust so bad.
>what they did was to kill entire villages
That was the NKVD user. Read the books posted, they're comprehensive and well referenced. Communist atrocities were transformed into "German atrocities" after Berlin fell. That's the central principle of post war history.
Why would the NKVD kill the Jews? I though they were run by the Jews.
>Why would the NKVD kill villages?
Because the villages had to be terrorized into non-collaboration with the Germans.
It's not all about Jews, you vomit speckled travelodge duvet.
Nice
Einsatzgruppen D
Location: Ananyev
Harvesting Action
The kolkhozniki started to bring in the harvest on their own initiative. The population, almost without exception, showed itself extremely willing to work. Only in Babchinzy was there some resistance to an orderly harvesting caused by the instigation of Jewish inhabitants and some Jews who came to this area a few months ago.
By spying on the population, these Jews had already created the basis for numerous deportations to Siberia. As a countermeasure, 94 Jews were executed.
The population was visibly relieved by these measures and hardly knows how to show its gratitude. This measure, as well as protecting the population from looting Rumanian soldiers, which was necessary in many cases, led to the fact that the population put absolute confidence in the Germans. This is reflected by the number of people reporting for work.
No, I mean why would they specifically target the Jews? Belarus lost most of its Jewish population.
Yeah, the nazis were quite delusional, weren't they.
He sounds rather more reliable a narrator than you, creature.
What sources? The Jager report is pretty damming evidence. The only thing that is suspicious is that they were operating in 1939 before the final solution was implemented.
Steady on there lad, no need for the heavy guns.
>It's not all about Jews
This.
>No, I mean why would they specifically target the Jews?
They didn't, unless the jews were a threat to the Soviets. Most of the time, jews assisted soviet subversion. That's what made the population such a problem, their uniform support for communist terrorists.
>Belarus lost most of its Jewish population
As refugees in the Soviet union, just like the majority of jews from every other area. What I meant in my post was not that the soviets were responsible for the death of jews. The crime of exterminating non-jews was flipped, and turned into a false story of non-jews killing jews. The extermination of Germans/Ukranians/Poles by the jews became "the extermination of jews by the Germans"
It's been debunked. By Snoopes. Nigger.
They were the ones that committed the atrocities on the german side, which is part of the reason why Himmler recruited convicts for the job. They also received the primary blame within Germany after WW2. The WW2-generation still adored Hitler after the war and Himmler was considered to be the main culprit behind the atrocities.
Eastern front was where the most important conflicts happened but it was also simultaneously the front of horrors where two monsters fought against each other and whenever one side had a victory over the other, the local populace got massacred. Gulags overall managed to kill more people than German concentration camps but the argument which ones were more evil are a bit hazy. On pure body count, Stalin killed more, but Soviet Union did not have a single Death Camp, all the Gulags were working camps with primary goal of exploiting slave labor instead of killing undesirables.
>As refugees in the Soviet union
What do you mean by that? Belarus was a part of the Soviet Union.
>Katyn
A "german atrocity" at Nuremberg, and until the Soviet union fell, and evidence that this was a Soviet atrocity falsely placed on Germany was uncovered. Russia has since offered official apologies to Poland for the massacre.
As refugees to the east, since the eastern front moved, and what was "in the soviet union" changed as it moved. Obviously, no?
>As refugees to the east
But where to "the east"?
The opposite of "to the west", genius.
No, I mean, specifically, which regions of the USSR?
They killed comedic amounts of Ukrainian Jews with the help of the Wehrmacht Military Police
And that's a good thing :^)
The dubunkler has already done his job