You know the drill
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
nytimes.com
twitter.com
16
16
Kys
Explain the full terms of the math operation clearly or my men will invade Berlin and have you shot.
1
Anyone who has taken math above a highschool level get 1 as the answer, the rest 16
/thread
it's one you retards
fuck these shit threads
8/2*(2+2)=16 if you're not a retard.
1
The actual answer to these gay bedmas formulas is..
“It’s a poorly written expression”
8/2*(2+2)
8/2*4
8/8=1
2+2 = (4)
8/2 = 4
(4)4 = 16
Everyone kys it’s literally 16
(4)4
kys
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
i got 16m but im also terrible at math..but i dont understand this
mental breakdown?
What color, anons?
/sci/ is over there
in the options field
>kys
on the other hand
>8/2*4
>8/8=1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAA
its the same shit so the pic is saying:
mathematicians = retards
It seems I was wrong
youtube.com
Am I the only one getting 16?
>not completing the denominator first
1
Time to take the RPN-pill
8 2 2 + 2 * /
8 4 2 * /
8 8 /
1
OR
8 2 / 2 2 + *
4 2 2 + *
4 4 *
16
+ no ambiguity
+ always reads and solves left to right
+ easier to parse, no backtracking
+ uses less memory
+ no operator precedence
Fuck your PEMDAS shit. RPN is god-tier.
4/4=1
Based leaf
(1/2)(8/(2+2))
(1/2)(8/4)
(1/2)(2)
=1
Zig Forums once again proves it is more retarded than 3rd grade math students
Ohh.. now I get it.
So different countries have different ways to calculate the result of the expression.
So the mutt way is to calculate from left to right.
And the normal way is to do the other way.
Patrician notation is RPN. Unambiguous every time and no need for parentheses or other ordering crutches.
dont steal my picture
RPN Masterace here :
8 2 2 2 + * /
I have no idea how people come up with 16.
Usually I believe to be the retard in any and all situations but on this one not so much.
What I've gathered.
Mathematicians have stated its poorly written.
Two different calculators have produced 16 and 1.
8÷2(4).
2(4) this little fucker here is throwing everying off with PEMDAS. Because you multiply before you divide.
However, you work left to right with co-equal operators. Which is kind of fucking stupid because you can write it top down, and it would still be the same equation.
8
-
2(4)
Which you would have to divide 8 by the total of 2(4).
KEK UNDERFUNDED MATHEMATICS