LMAO

>First of all, it was a courier FROM NY producers to LA.

Has anyone checked the cemetery near Goodsprings?

the story is shady, but I don't believe Tucker conspired to make that up
he's telling the truth from his perspective

youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7uLxu0XAc

>physically mailing documents
>not making any copies
Yeah, ok. What's the point of lying about this? I don't doubt they have documents or even that they were stolen, but there's no way it was the only copy.

Tucker tweeted that they have a copy.
Tucker also tweeted that the important finding here is that SOMEONE HAS BEEN READING THEIR TEXT MESSAGES, AND THAT SOMEONE THEN INTERCEPTED THE PACKAGE.
Now who do you suppose would do a thing like that??

Underrated.

imagine losing a piece of paper. why isn't this crap emailed instead. more like boomer carlson am i right

The real story is here faggot
wsj.com/amp/articles/the-bidens-and-tony-bobulinski-11603927190

Why did they even report this if they have copies? Just drop the fucking documents and then talk about how the originals were stolen as an attempted coverup, that would add to the veracity of the claims.

If you still believe this actual bullshit from a man that won a court case on the basis that nothing he says is true then you have got serious problems.

Attached: 1602200478801.jpg (621x341, 18.7K)

Lel why is the media falling for this now?

Now that's some cope.

He has copies. Also, most likely Fox never received the originals. There's no way the holder would hand that over.

Because if you're trying to catch the person spying on your text messages, sending an email doesn't give them an opportunity to reveal themselves when they intercept the package.

He never said it was the only copy, and it wasn't.

Biden MAFIA FedEx sleeper operatives ACTIVATED

Where? This headline says nothing of the sort.

why didn't he show them then? Almost 80 million people have already voted. 5 million people cast ballots every day.

>lost only copy
no he didn't.

I love how the Jew Yorker says the docs were in Ukraine being shopped around in 2019 or that Bobulinski wanted Trump team to give them to the WSJ earlier this year as if that makes his claims invalid. No retard the emails and texts are real and they incriminate Biden.

Attached: 8E1C7A20-40D7-4762-8F9F-6C1990867B45.jpg (828x432, 238.61K)

Oops

Attached: 20201029_193950.jpg (1242x786, 151.83K)

To make the people aware of how much of a cover up is going on. The real question is why would anyone bother stealing them in the first place when we all know copies are bound to exist. My guess was that Tucker couldn't couldn't ask Bobulinski about those really damning documents in time for that interview to confirm how real those are. How ever the package was done all in vain because they already officially stated that every thing Bobulinski has is straight up legit.

Who has the other cvopies? Are they in good hands or bad hands?

Attached: jc.png (226x223, 130.42K)

>why didn’t he show them?
see what happened, now everybody is jumping on the documents are missing story garnering free build up. one extra day means millions of new eyes watching. he’s Tucker, you can’t cuck the Tuck.

l;mao first you retards tout the new york post as some bastion of credible journalism because it's the only tabloid rag that would publish your retarded conspiracy theories next to their expose on bat boy, now you're buying hook line and sinker that tucker "no one could reasonably believe im news" carlson totally had this damning evidence but his dog ate it. Jesus christ, how pathetic can you morons get? think critically for once in your life.

It was about having the authentic papers, retard

>The real question is why would anyone bother stealing them in the first place when we all know copies are bound to exist.

Easy: They didn't steal them

Attached: 4363304D-69F3-4A84-B822-6D4225A4B8E2.jpg (1125x1392, 511.25K)

Pretty convincing bait 9/10

>only copy
fake as shit. trailer trash.

>I can end the election (which is already underway) with these docs
>tick tock!!

absolutely retarded.

>only copy
Well played mr Carlson

>I TOTALLY HAD THE SUPERSECRET DOCUMENTS BUT UHHHH MY DOG ATE THEM

Attached: 1601004448129.jpg (483x375, 37.17K)

>publish your retarded conspiracy theories
No one with any credibility or integrity is denying the authenticity of the laptop data. You're really fucking stupid if you think those leaks are fake.

based and redpilled

Attached: 67486388799.jpg (593x497, 99.4K)

Fake news, you fucking retarded shill

You don't really understand English do you? Are are you really low on the IQ spectrum?

It's the original papers lost I think, but they have copies of them.

Shills will ignore this.

Still have them Muhammed

relax nigger. You're the type of faggot that squirms when someone questions you of a crime kek

based

>Moarpenis found the thread

What's cope?
You're not aware that copies can be made of hard drives.
You're too fucking stupid to breathe, stop doing it.

lmao not even tucker carlson would touch the fucking story you fucking retard. thats why it was published in the new york post.

This is the important part. These people are reading your texts, your direct messages, they have access to your courier services and they will happily bury fucking everything to get their will through.
And then they will act surprised and go through a dog and pony show of "plausible deniability" when it happens.

"OH MY GOD HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN IN OUR COMPANY LET'S GO THROUGH ALL THE SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE AT ONCE!"

No one here is old enough to remember the Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee tape

So they never existed

whats the fucking point then?
why wouldn't tuck the cuck just say he has copies. he is being laughed at by the entire world.

So now the narrative is that it wasn't the only copy and Tucker wants to expose whoever is spying on his staff. It was 4D chess.
Let me ask you a couple questions:
If there are more copies why wasn't the document released? It was supposed to go out that night after all.
If it was bait, does it mean the document never contained damning info?
Again, if it does contain damning info. Where is it? Why aren't we reading it right now?
How does Tucker know that his messages are being tracked?
Seems like a pathetic attempt to grab some audience to me.

>why didn't he show them then?
Honestly, who knows? I mean, yeah, I can think of a few reasons and we can debate it. But shit is so fucked up this year. I have no idea who is really trustworthy, and who's just playing games. I'm just gonna wait and see. More than likely, nothing will ever happen. Because nothing ever happens. Especially not to elites.

>/tucker-carlson-lost-only-copy-of-documents-nailing-biden
First was not lost, bt stolen from the package. There is a major difference between losing something, and having someone take it. Also not the only copies, but his copies. As if Tucker had the only papers on this.