>Responding to my Lefty Professor

gender is a construct, sex is biological. Gender is based off your sex and culture you live in. Gender is both innate and socialized.

Debates devolve into word games. Why bother debate someone over the color of the sky, entering such a debate only validates their psychosis

Bump

Damn, Americans can get into college while barely being able to speak English.

this aswell, gender was synonymous with sex for almost the entire history of the word. If they wanted to make another concept they should have made a new word, but that's just it, their whole goal is to mix them together.

>Iwouldliketoapologizeformytoneinmyfirst discussion post.Sex and Gender are biological.Definemasculine andfeminineoutside thecontextofsex.Relating to your response to Money's experiment, you said "gender is socialized."David wassocializedtobeagirlthat didn't end upbeingagirl.If influenced bysocietyhe would havelovedbeingagirl.That isn't the case;he was happy to find out that is actually male.If this was all caused by a botchedcircumcision, then why not stop theproblemfrom ever occurring by banning infantcircumcision.Nowabout the gender roles you'vementionedwomendidn'tjustcook andclean.Theyworkedas well.Your idea of women just cooking and cleaning is based on a small period in history where men made so much money women didn't need to work.If they were raising a family during thattime, itwould make sense not towork.
Give me a second, I literally do this for a living.
>t. ghostwriter/editor

Tell her you're not open to legalized form of child grooming and pedophilia.

I attend a community college
So the answer is no

>these are the type of people who go to "uni" and are going to rule over us
LOLOLOLOL CLOWN WORLD INDEED.

I just read what you posted, and it was dogshit. You just need to spend more time sorting your thoughts so it doesn't look like you are spazzing out while you are trying to get a point across. Also actually put some effort in instead of just throwing shit at the wall. Take some time to research a little and understand your opponents' arguments before you even speak. Otherwise you will end up being shit on by the brainpower of your entire class.

Oh, it's not as bad as I thought. Still, my sides are in orbit. I've had a horrendous 2 weeks, OP, but your existence and making this thread have lifted my spirits. A warm thank you

I'd go with a third option. Go on the offensive. Accuse your prof of intentionally trying to harm students. Trannies have a 40% suicide rate. If the prof were pushing someone to do anything else with a 40% death rate they'd be arrested.

Act like an sjw and pretend to not understand the possibility that they don't know about the death rate and pretend to see them pushing this on you as a threat agaisnt your life. Use their own tactics against them.

Hormone blockers inhibit Gonadotropin releasing hormones which can cause death, or infertility.

Gender is not a social construct, it is a natural construct. Sex is biological gender, gender is a mental force.

>t. Spiritual Alchemist

Attached: 1600372591171m.jpg (512x1024, 167.71K)

Here you go.

First, I would like to clarify my position that sex and gender are biological. Relating to your response on Money’s experiment you had stated that “gender is socialized,” however despite David’s socialization to present as female he was more than happy to later identify as his sex at birth. Additionally, I would like to ask that if this whole scenario had arisen from a botched circumcision then why is this form of male genital mutilation not banned?

Second, the time periods in which women were more likely to be found in domestic roles is due to the fact that men earned enough to support an entire family. This is not to say that there were not women in the workforce as it was a choice (i.e. there were many women who assisted in the war communications during the early twentieth-century). However, it was not until women entered the workforce en masse that men’s wages had been halved due to the influx of women into the workforce. Despite this being framed as equality it has essentially led to the disintegration of families and the ruin of both sexes because neither individual in a partnership can support a family by themselves.

>correct what I have
Although I agree that it's BS you have to study it, what your professor said isn't that far out of left field other than saying that there is no biological basis for gender. Gender includes behavioral traits for men and women, these behavioral traits biologically based, hence why we see gender roles remain relatively similar across various cultures, even those that have no contact with eachother. Gender is not random or arbitrary though the roles will differ slightly between societies.

For example the commonalities between the role of women as the primary care giver to infants.

death is pretty rare but they do create structural change in the brain.

Attached: fimmu-09-00552-g001.jpg (829x516, 167.03K)

>However, it was not until women entered the workforce en masse that men’s wages had been halved due to the influx of women into the workforce.

correct to

>However, it was not until women entered the workforce en masse that men’s wages had been halved.

Redundant

OP you've already dug yourself a really deep hole. I'd just drop the class if I were you, there's no way you're passing at this point and you don't need to ruin your GPA over something so stupid.

>>I am retard when it comes to English
>>I will not learn proper English in a single day

>teacher believes gender "socially constructed"
>but language is not.

>she must control you through controlling your language.
>she doesn't believe any of the garbage she's spewing.

You really are. How the fuck are you in college???

in many schools, having a "social justice" class is mandatory.

Women worked, they just did not work outside the home. For example, the wife of an artisan would do small things to assist him in his craft. The wife of a higher class merchant would help keep his books for him. A farmer's wife would help with things like processing crops. Women also did work around the house as mentioned, such as cook and clean, while the men were out. These were all necessary functions that complemented men's work, they were not useless and at the same time they did not replace it.

Telling women to work in men's professions, and replace men in them, is misogyny, since women are not mentally or psychologically equipped to do these tasks, even if it's a white-collar job with no physical requirement. Women have very important jobs that only they can do, such as raising children (no, men are not as good with infants and young children as women, and anybody who says so is a faggot) and keeping a household orderly in order to create a positive environment for the rest of her family.

The only reason women don't want to do this any more is because it has been depicted as low status and unfashionable by the media, and women are NPCs who follow whatever they are told. Simply changing the state religion back to Christianity from whatever hellspawned progressive garbage we have now will reverse it entirely, as depicting women who work male jobs as :losers who can't find husbands to love them: will change all of their opinions almost overnight.

I work with Chinese nationals on their higher education coursework. Everything from community college to Ivy League grad level. I have done many group responses and you'd be shocked to see the level of English capability at the grad level with "native" speakers. Higher ed is really doomed.

This. OP, while not all people need it, you definitely need to draft an outline before you start writing. Since you seem pretty basic, let me give you a simple skeleton and some writing advice. Start by offering your premise which you are going to prove-- "Trucks are more useful than cars." Add a "because" and list three reasons. Use the rule of three for now.

Each of those reasons will become its own paragraph. Use the idea to begin each paragraph. "Trucks are better work vehicles than cars." Try to have 2-3 points of discussion and follow the A P E format. A - Assertion P - Proof E - Explain.

A - Many jobs require hauling loads which are beyond a car's capacity.

P - According to X study, "The average length of wood for construction is..."

E - Since even the materials for smaller projects cannot fit into cars, the usefulness of trucks goes beyond commercial construction, such as...

I am in a Community College
I am not actually retarded
However, my English would say otherwise.
Either way I still like your honesty and I would like to improve
I do suggest reading the previous threads about the situation

>arguing with a communist professor
Willing to ditch a year of your life to BTFO a commie huh?

Sure, but the class he's in now is going to be a failure anyway, might as well nip it in the bud and try again next semester.

I teach English at the high school level and can attest to this. Beyond being unable to write or attempt grammar, most students have shit computer skills. They struggle to not only word process, but also to merely do simple tasks like file management.

I would like to Thank you user for your help. Every single English teacher has failed me in learning English. I truly want to improve everything. I might have to check out /lit/ later

/lit/ isn't a place to learn English. Depending on what you want to focus on, I may have some resources I can give you.

It turns out, you can't learn English by reading excerpts of social justice books and writing 2 page essays responding to the reading. You simply have to read a lot of high quality texts. The highest quality texts are the classics, which are conspicuously absent from all levels of education outside of an actual classics course, and even then you might not read them directly.

"Higher education" has been a joke for over a decade now. The wise have already started avoiding it. Now the system of academia is coasting on government money and the momentum of lower class children thinking it's a ticket into the upper class.