Who Won?

Who Won?

Attached: pool vs vaush.jpg (1522x756, 191.79K)

China

vaush obviously won

vaush won because tim pool cant handle bad faith actors or even thought that this was a debate

vaush isn't a bad faith actor

literally who?

ideologues are bad faith actors by nature because they bend reality to fit their ideology

I unironically like Vaush.
He's an unapolegtic commie but he doesn't deny it AND he admits to his political biases.

Tim refusing to criticize Trump really shows how partisanship fried his brain. Trump is not a perfect human. It's okay to say criticize him on issues. I guess he's terrified of backlash from his own audience

He is a communist faggot. Soredakeda.

>...they bend reality to fit their ideology
everyone is a bad faith actor then

and?

Me by not watching.

kys

closer to the truth than where you started at least.

vaush is a modern day sophist. The reason they were popular during the greek period in history is that they would stride for one thing and one thing only, victory rhetoric wise. They will not concede on any point, learn anything from a debate, and just use verbal flourishes to either confuse or trick their opponent. Being clever in a debate of information is a very feminine trait, and to the untrained mind appears as traits of an actual intellectual, leading to kids believing they have found the savior.

He literally argued defending yourself against a communist mob is wrong.

>that's not intersectionality or critical race theory but I still can't define it to you

Not everyone subscribes to view the world through a lense where everything has to fit in politically labeled boxes you moron.

not liking what he says doesn't mean he's saying things in bad faith

IT WASN'T A DEBATE DIPSHIT

this has nothing to do with anything I said, so I don't know why you're quoting me

He isn't even a sophist, he is insincere piece of shit who weaseled his way from examples brought up proving his idealism is garbage by going
>I'm not aware of that so I can't speak on that
No shit, what you know is also in part defined by what you don't know but he was just an avoidant little bitch.

Because not everyone twists reality to fit their ideology.

He does criticize him too. It's even more retarded Vaush called Tim far right.

yes they do, in order to formulate anything you need to be rooted in a certain episteme. There is no detached inquiry

>there is no thing as objective truth, it's all subjective ideology
Retard

not sure
but the losers are anyone who tuned into this shit

lol

you missed the point

They do, just to different degrees. We all need to be aware of our biases.

Ok retard, keep twisting reality to fit your retarded world view.

>biases
You mean from having a perspective because you can't experience everything at once all the time in this universe?

Attached: bwj.png (300x168, 8.31K)

If you can't even define what you really believe then don't go around calling anyone else a retard.

The dude seems to be a communist. Anything to the right of communism is far right to them. Hence national socalism being far right.