Is the Afghan war winnable?

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Afghan_War
British victory

No. The people are retarded and enjoy have boots on their necks. On top of that the Taliban are down for total war and the west doesn’t have the stomach for it.

It is, when you understand that "afghanistan" isn't a country. It's a rocky desert with a few settlements dotted around it. It's like calling the Sahara a country just because there's a few people living in some tents on the edge of it.
Just realise that the borders around it are not afghan borders, but the borders of the countries around that desert.

That is why the nazi's would be the one that would win it.

No afghans, renamed to sandplek and be done with it.

Attached: 1605345368119.jpg (1024x1024, 121.81K)

every country without Jesus Christ as its Lord is a desert land, don't kid yourself fool

thats rich coming from someone worshipping a middle-eastern desert heeb and his book of jewish tricks authored by 66 jews KEK

Attached: 1604000467487.png (961x1912, 182.32K)

>...so long as the Arabs fight tribe against tribe, so long will they be a little people, a silly people, greedy, barbarous, and cruel...
this waffle is correct. Never ending conflict to feed the military industrial complex

youtu.be/4gMt1PBC5BU

So you call it a victory, when they succeed to retreat without dying? Ok, it is a victory compared to the first attempt, where they were massacred.

Attached: _20201119_133821.jpg (1080x1432, 238.97K)

We kicked your ass out too. I'm sure many others did as well. Now you can't even conquer London.

Britain is long dead.

>winnable
Not by the USA

we conquered them in a week. cia installed a us friendly afghan as president, but these are dumb sand niggers that fuck their cousins so they're all retarded and are basically perpetually fucked. but they didn't bankrupt the US especially since we thrive on war.

You went from 85% white to 56% white in those 20 years mutt.

>amerimutts actually believe this
i bet you think you won nam too LMAO

Attached: 21c.png (600x500, 97.53K)

Define winning.

It is definitely winnable. Just carpet bomb the cities, kill the men and enslave the women and install a viceroy to govern.

Sadly in these trying modern times such warfare would be considered "inhumane". The US will never win, for each bacha bazi fucker they kill two cousins spawn and thus the cycle repeats.

You can't win something you don't want it to end. It's all about the war money my boii

we already won, we arent at war.

it’s an “overseas contingency operation” that is certified again and again in the AUMF

>each bacha bazi fucker they kill
They literally protect them.

Right now 'winning' the war means making the government position powerful enough so that they can keep down the Taliban by themselves, so no, it's not winnable.

Of course. Modern wars are for pussies though. Afghanistan wouldn't last if wars were total. But wars nowadays are perpetual, and only manufactured to sell equipment or destabilize the oil market.

This man knows

Cia dipping it's fingers in all that heroin money while our boys patrol around in poppy fields. That's a w for the us gubbmint

and the poppies
poppies
corner on the world wide heroine market
demolition of towers est casus belle