I see a lot of flat earth videos with that goofy NASA guy saying “we don’t have the technology to go back to the moon.”, implying that we never went to the moon and it’s all a cover-up.
The truth is that the scientists like Werner Von Braun who built the Rocketdyne F1 engine didn’t use computers or advanced technology at all. They relied on extreme engineering ingenuity, slide rules and improvisation, which was mostly lost over the years and especially after they died.
Now, NASA is reusing the rocket engines from the old space shuttle and people wonder why. It’s because they suck at building rockets and it’s a completely different generation of morons who really can’t get to the moon without serious help. Old school wisdom and old man grit is what they’re lacking.
Flattards btfo space is real and we’re going back to the moon within 6 years.
Flattards are wrong about space
Other urls found in this thread:
io9.gizmodo.com
twitter.com
nigger does this look
>real
to you?
Only glow niggers promote flat earth
Its less about the math and more about the engine cones. IIRC we could replicate everything about the saturnV except the 10ft engine farings.
Something about the fact its somehow pressed and rolled or some shit, its a fabrication method that has literally been lost to time.
Since we cant reproduce the farings, we would need to re-design the entire engine.
Wow, it's almost like we lost all the decent genes after 1970. No one born after then is worth anything.
Honestly, we hav to stop tolerating his shit from politicians. From now on, yell at them every interview, public appearance, press conf. etc.
EVERY news publication gets hammered d too.
we should indicate that we're tired of lies. loud. clearly.
Yes, here's an article how they filmed the launch if you're too stupid to DYOR: io9.gizmodo.com
t. bluepilled
There are many things which cast doubt on the globe such as the lack of curve drop, the fact that very tall distant objects don't appear to be leaning away with distance, the fact that horizon always rises to eye level regardless of altitude, the fact that there are many objects which can be seen despite the fact that if the numbers were true they would be hundreds of feet below the curve, etc, the fact that physics of water do not function in the level that globe theorists say it does, etc. It is not a globe. Read Zetetic Astronomy
The earth is huge it doesn't make sense that you'd be able to see the curve from an airplane or even a high altitude balloon (which can only go up to a certain area within the atmosphere, not into space). I fly all the time and am not delusional enough to believe in seeing an imaginary curve even though I know it's there.
Do your carers know you're spouting nonsense on the internet?
no matter what gymnastics they perform, he entire thing is blarney, and always has been. Low Orbit (orbit? debatable) YES, anything higher, No...
High altitude balloons, yes absolutely, with very long lifespans. Super starwars space satellites that move with little thrusters to re-align and bounce the secret codes, No.
Undrsea cables, long range fiber links witb single mode fyiber and signal amplifiers and multiplexing and all sorts of optical tricks to load up fiber optics with signals YES.
Space lasers, sending your IRC chat to a space platform and bounce to Singapore Tea House, No.
The curve drop isn’t small – it is clear that you are just ignorant. The drop is 8 inches times the distance in miles squared. Even something two miles in the distance SHOULD have a drop of nearly three feet. And again – why do distant buildings patently NOT lean away? Why does the allegedly dropping horizon always rise to even level, the exact opposite of what is expected to happen if the Earth was truly a globe 25,000 miles in circumference. If the Earth is the size they say it is, you would absolutely, 100% see a drop from an airplane window.
Read Zetetic Astronomy and check out Eric Dubay’s channel on Jewtube or bitchute and start de-brainwashing yourself
What a fucking nigger are you going to post any facts or just make wild claims about a multi-billion dollar industry that does indeed exist?
>can’t even debunk a single point
How typical
I have used a ham radio to talk to the ISS and have downloaded pictures of the earth from weather satellites as they pass overhead.
satellites are as real as real can be and you can get some radio equipment and do this all yourself.
The following image was pulled from a russian weather satellite when it was having issues with its alignment
>The curve drop isn’t small
I've only heard this statement and seen that graph from flattards. You can go outside and visibly confirm that the curve drop IS small and that buildings just a few miles away DON'T lean away (absurd and erroneous notion). I'm fairly certain that math is garbage too but it's 6am here and I'm not looking at the details of bullshit right now.
>Read Zetetic Astronomy and check out Eric Dubay’s channel on Jewtube or bitchute and start de-brainwashing yourself
I have and it's all comprised of weakly supported conspiracy theories based on a Mossad psyop. I'm not new to the Internet, thanks.
>You can go outside and visibly confirm that the curve drop IS small and that buildings just a few miles away DON'T lean away (absurd and erroneous notion)
Ergo, the Earth is flat and scientists bend your perception of reality to fit an erroneus globe model onto it that goes against everything that is clear and obvious
>I have and it's all comprised of weakly supported conspiracy theories
That you can’t even debunk!
IT’S FLAT
I've had quite a bit of difficulty finding precise info about satellite launch, deploy, control, etc. It's very secretive, and nothing I do find seems plausible. I admit, I don't provide much, but it's hard to find much. I mean, the actual information about how a satellite is deployed to Xhigh orbit, from a launched rocket, by whom, Co ntrolled how, and logistics etc.
I don't believe it's all so proprietary they can't publish it. Does anyone know anything specific they can provide? NOT propaganda. nuts and bolts.
There's nothing to debunk
Same with the Holohoax, eh Chaim?
That is the first non NASA no governmental image I have ever been provided from outer space. I'd like too analyse this further.... cause it looks like bullshit.
How high until you're supposed to see curvature?
Ball tards gonna tard.
you're telling me with Digital HAM radio you downloaded this image from a Russian satellite = yourself?
That looks as fake as shit
>J-just a little bit higher!
>the truth that
the truth is that space doesn't exists (but obviously space rats do)
Rocket tech is hundreds of years old in development user.
that's a graphic, not a photo, right? Is this proof of the shape and size of tyhe earth? should we bother comparing continent sizes?
>its a fabrication method that has literally been lost to time.
sounds like BS. It was only 50 years ago, its not like the ancient pyramids. They cannot come up with an alternate fabrication method in current year? fuck science
Fuck your planes as an example. Explain why you can’t see a big fucking ship at sea if it further than 10 miles away (depending the height you are observing)
Flat earth is a Psyop to discredit people that question meme moon landing
not sure about that anons process but ive reconfigured the satellite dish on my house to accept the feed from the NOAA GOES-17 satellite
Hey bro, you have an abundance of confidence, but you are indeed stupid as fuck. Please find a different conspiracy to comfort you instead of something which reveals so clearly your lack of any sort of reasoning or intelligence.
The depth of the trailer park intellectual is truly immense
Sure you can, with the correct optics.
NAVY gunners can see line-to-sight 100+ miles away.
The world isn't FLAT but it's definitely level.
Are you having a hard time?
>trailer park intellectual
Not an argument, just ad hom.
Do you have an intellect?
10-4 good buddy. post more of these. over and out
Flat earth is a psyop.
Just for the laugh, could a flat earth believer explain why we are being pushed the idea of globe earth
oof, are you prepared for the world to turn its back on space as a religion?
Simple surveys are showing more and more people are starting to look at FE as viable, even more so than the NASA dogma.
It's BEEN going this way... before Trump and mass censorship to slow his support and message, FE was blowing up in ways that had major scientists melting down and calling for censorship.
You're losing.
There's no way to seriously approach someone spouting retardation concocted by 19th century Anglo-American fundamentalist schizophrenics, so I'm not trying
Ad hom is fine when debating flat earthers. Logic has almost no relevance to such a debate
>the fact that horizon always rises to eye level regardless of altitude
Doesn't appear at eye level if youre 15 miles up you stupid nigger
"No true Scotsman" fallacy?
Ok... move on.