Global official death rate is 2.2%

1.4 million deaths. How high could this still go? 2 million? 3 million? Forever deaths?

Attached: EB552E63-2365-4601-87F9-5DA65C329491.jpg (1331x1313, 151.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-archive-united-nations-54a3a5869c9ae4ee623497691e796083
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Now post the influenza deaths over the same time frame, as well as the influenza deaths in in 2019. And then tell me what conclusions can be drawn when looking at those statistics.

DO IT FAGGOT

>3 million deaths
>7.7 billion people
>3/100 of 1% of the world dying
NOOOOOOOOOOOP

I don’t care about influenza.

The World Health Organization estimates that worldwide, annual influenza epidemics result in about 3-5 million cases of severe illness and about 250,000 to 500,000 deaths.

And what is the influenza number this year?

WHO estimated months ago that 10% of the population has already had the flu. So the real death rate is MUCH lower.

probably as high as up to SIX GORILLION

after influenza post the differences of heart disease deaths this year as well

What percentage of those deaths would have occurred anyway had they gotten a mid-level to severe flu? I'ma guess about 90-99%. Because this is a bad flu, nothing more.

1.4/40
deaths vs recovered
gives: 3.5% mortality rate

This is with medical care, treatment and assumes accurate data and reporting.

This isn't slowing down but instead ramping up, following the trend out 5 to 10 years we are looking at 30% global deaths. Get comfy the end times are truly upon us. Things don't collapse over night but instead take decades.

and pneumonia

Its all fags niggers and tranny's. Every death is good for the climate change

A minority of cases are tested. Your conclusions are misleading.

6 gorilion

>assuming accurate data and reporting

We have a vaccine now.

Add three zeros and i would be really pleased.

No enough. We need at least 1.4 billion.

Everyone, including you, will die eventually.

Yes, don't assume. Assuming leads to bad assumptions

We have no other data to base off of.

Should I just start making numbers up based on feelies?

>entire world wearing mask and under lockdown
>10% of the world has had the flu
How many lies from the WHO do people have to tolerate before they stop listening?

Because the data is flawed on both the "positive" testing end, and the mortality rate.

deaths with
vs
deaths from
real death rate is below 1%

to put things into perspective,
the number of hiv positive people in the us vs the number of hiv positive people who died in 2018 stand at around 1.4%.

>Everyone, including you, will die eventually.
DOUBT

>Should I just start making numbers up based on feelies?
Obviously not, but neither shoudl you make calculations based on the number of diagnoses when there is no chance that each case has been counted. WHO estimated already in the beginning of October that 10% of world's population has already contracted the virus. This would mean that official diagnoses make up less than 10% of all cases, which would put overall mortality to somewhere around 0.3%

apnews.com/article/virus-outbreak-archive-united-nations-54a3a5869c9ae4ee623497691e796083

6.4 billion would be even better.

Look. Faggots will only accept facts from organizations they deem credible. For some reason normie faggots think the WHO is the global authority on accurate health information. If we are going to try and make the dumb faggots see the truth we need to speak retard. So when the WHO says that 10% have been infected globally that is great. If anything the global deaths from COVID are artificially inflated. So at best normies will have to accept that the death rate across all age groups is ~.15%. If anyone tries to debunk you just call them a science denier and ask for their medical degree.

>the number of hiv positive people in the us vs the number of hiv positive people who died in 2018 stand at around 1.4%.
HIV ain’t airborne

The truth is that if we had let this virus go wild and spread, we would already be at 20 million deaths globally.

That's why the weak and infirm need to be quarantined while the healthy individuals should be free to carry about our business. Just another example of western society catering to the lowest of the low instead of raising up the productive members.

Many studies have arrived at similar conclusion. It was estimated that in china about 80% of cases went undiagnosed. It is also known that many cases are mild to asymptomatic, which further lowers the amount of diagnoses.

maybe you should care about influenza, a significant portion of covid cases are pneumonia secondary to influenza

the first outbreak last spring they didnt test all asymptomatic carriers like they do now

Where’s your proof of that?
Influenza is distinctly different from Corona Chan

>That's why the weak and infirm need to be quarantined
That’s 40% of the population. No way, Jose. Not just because they don’t want to but also it’s impossible. Some opld greaser will always want to see his grandkids, it’s his right as a lineage provider.

This. Better reflection of the true mean vs using cases due to conditional bias in when we decide to test.