Can anyone provide actual arguments for why I shouldn't be a libertarian, other than "muh roads"?

Can anyone provide actual arguments for why I shouldn't be a libertarian, other than "muh roads"?

Government is clearly one of the biggest hindrances to the advancement of mankind that exists, and this "pandemic" has made that more clear than ever.

Attached: k1f92lhnf4h21.png (1200x1200, 1.01M)

Cheap labour

Importing millions of niggers is profitable for those on top

most 3rd word immigrants are a net economic loss to society , and even if that weren't true, you could have immigration without big gov

>to society
Key word, to society

Bezos gets to pay his workers less

You have to remember that billionaires are not on your side, why do you think they all support mass migration, why would they?

youre saying libertarianism is bad because it enables cheaper labor?

if markets were free to operate without government intervention, then wages would find natural equilibriums. Companies wouldn't be forced to hire illegals or move their manufacturing overseas to skirt minimum wage laws because they'd find local unskilled people willing to work for lowish wages commensurate to their actual economic value.

Now you have 12hr work shifts with little pay. Workers don’t like that

Nobody has to do anything they don't want to do. If they're unhappy with one employer, they can move to the next. Opportunities will be plentiful when beaureacratic overhead is reduced.

Because libertarianism only works in homogenous, high-trust societies, faggot. Libertarians have to safeguard a racial/ cultural majority in order to accommodate their lifestyle. There is nothing libertarian about that. It's a paradox.

Our societies lost their homogeneity because top-down beaureaucracy forced mass immigration upon us.

have you ever heard the saying "democracy is the worst form of government ever conceived. except for all the other ones"

So no federal government? What would stop china or some other faggot country from invading?

Lol wut?
>don’t like working at Amazon? Work at Walmart to get fucked over just the same

Maybe you're missing my point. You need a political/ civic hegemony in order to ensure true liberty. You either need a government to enforce certain standards for the good of the body politic, or you need to force private citizens to comply with certain social agendas (which amounts to the same thing).

Democracy is pretty gay to be honest. Especially when your country is full of empowered womyn and tribalistic retards.

accidentally hit post before finishing to write.

have you ever heard the saying "democracy is the worst form of government ever conceived. except for all the other ones"

the problem with the whole "abolish the government" movements is that something immediately moves in.

heck take a look at the "free press" which was taken over by the cabal and used to harm the people.

there actually was one single an-cap country in history. it was a heaven of invention and advancement for a couple of years... before someone moved in and just conquered them because they had no real army. none of the armed libertarian citizens stood a chance against a real army.

you need a small yet strong government.

W R O N G

Immigration was beneficial for large corporations so the lobbied for it, if we were a libertarian society whites would be 20% of the population.

So Hoppeanism?

If you lack government, of course you have immigration. You have unlimited immigration because there are no restrictions.

Like Minarchy?

stupid people (niggers) will make bad financial decisions in workplace that will ultimately hurt you and him. the only way it works is if only whites are allowed.

also jews infiltrate businesses.

Isn't it nice that socialized medicine would allow free movement between employers.
Employees would gravitate to the best job, instead of the job that provides the best benefits.

government intervention is what ensures jew megacorps don't get monopolies over entire sectors
opportunities require they not be de-facto banned in that field or region
whine about ebil gubment all you please, but only they have the power to shatter what your negligence routinely creates

this is honestly the one point that I struggle with the most

my best response is that generally when countries invade each other they take control by disabling and commandeered the enemy government. with a decentralized network of small local allied governments / militias, it would be pretty difficult logistically to go through the whole country conquering everyone

OH, and monopoly owners don't have your interests at heart.
also think to yourself "at what point is a government a business and vice versa"
that's what got me off of that libertarian shit.

It would make things easier. Less large scale weapons, less organisation, less formal training, less soldiers.

>Like Minarchy?
to a point, minarchy is much better than the typical liberterian ideals of an-cap
but is still a bit too minimalistic

>but is still a bit too minimalistic
that said, moving closer to minarchy instead of massive government is often an improvement

this
OP you're a retard. the one you struggle with the most should be the mass migration

Because politics is about power by means of controlling the state. If you refuse to control the state your enemies will use it against you. Do unto others before they do unto you.

You don't need to have zero government. You have a conglomeration of local governments that can coordinate resources and efforts without devouring everyone's lives.

Muh immigration? Muh air? Muh water? Muh not wanting to suit up and do hand to hand combat fighting off armed junkie scabs just to get Muh groceries? Muh community?

>Can anyone provide actual arguments for why I shouldn't be a libertarian

Attached: no..jpg (502x569, 42.15K)

you don't need socialized medicine to do this.
the place that you work doesn't give you your grocery list.

>US Government
>cooperation

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA thats a good one there! I almost thought you were serious.

look i get this argument, but economic prosperity doesn't come from political action. it comes from economic action.
historically oppressed groups of people (the protestants, for example) have achieved success out of paying their dues on time, respecting the time of others, and upholding the entrepreneurial spirit.