Grifters: A Right Wing Phenomenon

Why is the right full of sell outs and grifters? The left has dumb e-celebs but at least they actually believe what they're saying. Is there something inherent in conservative ideology that makes them easy to fool?

Examples:
Nick Fuentes
Baked Alaska
Sargon of Akkad
Milo Yiannapolis
(to a lesser extent) Stefan Molyneux

These are all people who have no reason to be well known, they're just internet famous, and they've done very little for the right at large, but they have made a LOT of money off of donations.

Why?

Attached: file.png (1200x600, 867.26K)

There entertainers. They’re not political figures. No matter what they tell you, they could care less about the problems of America and are solely there to collect as revenue.

In 2015, the left was in power. They positioned themselves as “the opposition” and followed through until 2018-2019. The Overton window has shifted, and they have to shift their beliefs to stay relevant.

Stop following these people. They dont care about you. Go out, read, and form your own opinions. You’ll be better for it.

Attached: D4506E79-8A3E-448C-8328-42A199147427.jpg (1408x792, 141.26K)

All wealthy leftards are 100% grifters.

California is the 100% liberal grifter state. The wealthy liberals give themselves hidden tax cuts.

They got pissed off at Trump for getting rid of the state tax deduction. California libs don't pay federal taxes.

You know how liberals always claim they pay for red state social welfare? They don't because they deduct state taxes from their federal taxes.

Democrats are full of ambitious, wealthy assholes who manipulate illiterate spics and niggers for foreign business interests.

Attached: aoclaughing.jpg (474x309, 12.7K)

The right falls for grifters because of a general lack of intelligence and because of a "trust God's plan" Christcuck upbringing.
It's no coincidence that many of the grifters have plan-trusting as a theme and sprinkle cringey Bible quotes around liberally.

How about Nancy Pelosi? The hero of the proletariat?

She won't pass a stimulus bill without tax cuts for the rich!!!

"Muh right wing grifters."

Attached: nancy.jpg (474x316, 21.98K)

Thanks for the reply. I agree with your assessment, it's just a shame so many people are wasting their lives and political energy on dead ends like American Nationalism.

Fair point, maybe I just don't see it because I don't follow leftist circles at all. It just seems to me that people like the Young Turks are scum but they are true believers that social justice and open borders will lead to a better world (somehow).

Attached: file.png (1270x713, 1.51M)

I disagree with your premise. Anita Sarkeesian was the first political internet grifter, and she made it all the way to the United Nations with her drivel.

The left has 1000 times more grifters.

It's the party of champagne socialists, limousine liberals. Every faggot the left jerks off to is a grifter.

Here is one.. Bill Maher.

Attached: billmaher.jpg (474x316, 15.09K)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding what a grifter really is. I see a grifter as someone who takes advantage of generally powerless people and says things they want to hear in order to make money from them in donations and dopamine in the form of retweets. Anita Sarkeesian's profile and fame was astro-turfed from the top (via left wing NGO's and journalists), she didn't have a huge organically grown audience the way that guys like Fuentes and Molyneux have.

Attached: file.png (1200x899, 1.48M)

They're grifters, too.

Aneeta, Cenk... there all children of immigrants from affluent families.

Look at how much money they try to mine off their gullible fans. They have paywalled their "progressive" content.

Attached: laugh.jpg (425x283, 38.19K)

Oh it just seems to you they're true believers and the others aren't because it just seems that way.

There would have been a discussion here if you named real grifters.

Molyneux and Fuentes have had to pave their own way against all odds and even those who be aligned ideologically.

Molyneux's corpus of content, videos like 'The Story of Your Enslavement', and other anti-globohomo videos were shown at YouTube HQ to have a real quantitative effect on viewer behavior. After watching one of these videos, a visitor would be interested in a whole different category of YouTube -- videos about the Federal Reserve, videos about alternative social thought, people pontificating about the dynamics between men and women, conversations with scientists about the heredity of intelligence, etc etc...

Those kinds of eloquent, effective presentations had to be manually blocked from the recommendation algo. A collection of six or so of his highest-converting content. They made sure to generate user reports to shut the rest down slowly, over the course of months, so that outrage couldn't be effectively fomented.

It was coordinated with outside parties as well, in a similar way to how Alex Jones blacklisting was pre-arranged among multiple platforms, and large-reach supporters were muted to prevent reaching a critical mass of outrage that kept the story going.

Hope.

Did you expect them to actually make a difference?

Attached: 4c22a534a79ed24999018423b648f4a1.jpg (603x437, 58.33K)

>Molyneux and Fuentes have had to pave their own way against all odds and even those who be aligned ideologically.
Fuentes is definitely a grifter and controlled opposition

Attached: EiTTqmSXkAAkVen.jpg (1080x1080, 216.11K)

>How about Nancy Pelosi? The hero of the proletariat?
Nancy Pelosi is a capitalist and proud of it, as she has said many times

Retarded to assume it's only happening on the right. Look at Vaush, look at chapo

Who?

Is "grifter" really the right word though? I didn't think there was any money on the right, at least not to the extent that it exists on the left. My guess is they're in it for the (you)s because being a know it all blow hard feels good.

The word grifter as applied to anyone other than the left is yet another gross inversion of reality which is their stock in trade. If you see someone using the word you can bet it's a leftist/progressive. If you see worthy targets for the term when applied to the right, look first whether the person is some kind of rino set up specifically as a tarbaby

>Fuentes
>Not a Grifter
He is one of the biggest grifters of them all and is fag.

Attached: 1561250365841.png (480x466, 139.12K)

>I didn't think there was any money on the right, at least not to the extent that it exists on the left
What are you talking about? Don't you remember the ''we will build the wall'' fund that the guy was arrested for after spending money on speedboats and cars?

The my pillow guy who was straight up advertising his company while on stage with Trump? Right wing americans throw money at anything.

or a Spencer.
Grifter is an attempt to demonise anyone earning money who isn't a progressive because...anything else is evil.

>at least they actually believe
The Left is an ideological grift.

This. Every "ambitious" person I've ever known, the type that always dresses super nice, likes the right things and tries really hard to network are always progressive lefties.

She's from San Fagcisco. She keeps blowing smoke up poor nigger asses. "Muh poverty. Muh social welfare. Muh free abortions. Muh poor niggerinos."

She is the biggest grifter of all.

Attached: biden.jpg (1200x800, 65.41K)

Who ever said that Pelosi was a leftist, besides Republicans? Because every single leftist I have ever met hates that woman's guts.

No but you see Molyneux doesn't actually believe the things he says, he just says it to make money and I base that on absolutely nothing besides my gut feeling it seems so.
It doesn't seem that way for leftists and cuckservatives though, those are true believers.

Influencers are not grifters, they're programmers.

>Why is the right full of sell outs and grifters?

new to politics? right wingers never like or approve of any right wing voice. every.. single.. right wing adovate gets canceled by the right.. EVERY single one.

ever wonder why there are no prominent right advocate? now you know.

>bill maher
>leftist

baked alaska is based. get fucked

Molyneux did a lot to bring people right up to the edge of ethnonationalism but stopped short. I might be wrong, but it always seemed like he was trying to avoid being banned. He did the same thing on the Jewish question, he would complain about things that jews were responsible for and jewish ideas, but he would never say that jews as a whole were a problematic group.

The thing is, he got banned anyway. And he HAS to know, you don't become as well read as him and not start to see a pattern throughout history. So I designated him as a grifter, to a small extent at least, because he wasn't willing to openly state something that is true. Maybe I'm being unfair.

As far as Fuentes goes, I've just seem him and his people do a lot of gay shit like bitching about wignats and saying they're going to take over and reform the GOP. I don't think he actually believes this stuff, I just think he saw a financial niche he could carve out with further right-leaning young men.

So if those guys aren't grifters, what are some better examples of right wing grifters?

republicans are also leftists.

Because the Communists planned this a long time ago. Real patriots are not not screens.

>baked alaska is based. get fucked

the right already cancelled him for fucking a girl that wasnt 40+ yrs old

>>at least they actually believe
i seriously doubt people like Baked , Milo and Fuentes actually believe in what they are saying

>I base that on absolutely nothing besides my gut feeling it seems so.
is this ironic? Because it is this type of thing that allows cynical progressives to get everybody else to call their opponents grifters- and justify the xensorship

Yeah theyre all optics cucks and "principled", so anyone (((halfway skilled))) at rhetoric can easily make them trip over themselves by pointing out some pedantic inconsistency or something and force them to make a blood sacrifice to not lose face with leftists who a priori think they're scum.

They're all obsessed with titles, their standing in the social hierarchy.

They all think like Jews with chips on their shoulders. See Jill Biden... she wants to be called doctor.

They all wants brand new Teslas and titles.

Jill Biden snapped like Barbara Boxer did over a decade ago over someone not addressing her by her chosen title. It's why they relate to trannies and pronouns.

Attached: models.jpg (474x266, 22.09K)

Stephen Crowder
Kaitlin Bennett
And that other blonde bitch I can't remember the name of.

All dumb as bricks.

America loves itself a celebrity- they worship it the most out of anything..

>All wealthy leftards are 100% grifters.
All wealthy rightcucks are 100% grifters too

It's not about political views, it's about money.