It looks shit tho

Nobody focuses on PC, PC is an afterthought

I can tell, things look more outlined

>Lords of the Rings: Gollum
Gollum is getting his own game? Really?
Gollum had some backstory in The Hobbit and all, but is Gollum considered an interesting enough character to get his own game?

What do you mean? It looks 10000 times better. totally worth cutting your fps in half for.

Raytracing is the only way to make improvements at this point. Higher res textures are tapped out.

But I hate the godrays they do. You hardly ever see that sort of thing irl.

>Raytracing is the only way to make improvements at this point.
>when massive pop in and everything looking PS2 tier beyond 30 feet still exist.

Sure

Name one 2019 game where that's still an issue on PC.

Any of them that arent corridor hallway games.

Such as?

So this game would have been a world premiere at E3, had it not gotten cancelled?

If we're talking about 2019 games specifically then Sekiro, RDR2, MHW: Iceborne, The Division 2.

All of which are photo realisitc with no pop in.

>with no pop in.
Do you even know what pop in is?

yes.

Sekiro and MHW are nowhere near photorealistic, are you fucking insane?
Do you not go outside or something?

Apparently not if you think it's absent from modern games.

It's a bait picture made by seething retard who would like you to think that RTX has not value whatsoever. RTX actually makes a very noticeable difference in the good conditions (reflective surface, good lighting sources), especially when you're in motion (Star Wars Battlefront II is really good at it). Other time, it won't do much, and isn't worth the framedrop.

I do use it in single players game if I still get a good framerate. In multiplayer, I mostly drop it, eye candy isn't the point and framerate reign supreme anyway.

>Star Wars Battlefront II is really good at it
That's funny because it doesn't even support ray tracing.

can't see shit

Next gen will be vastly better RT'd compared to what Turing does. Turing was a very expensive beta test. Reading up on Ampere seems like that will deliver 4x the RT performance per card tier, compared to that of Turing. You could be getting 2080TI levels of RT performance in your 3060.

AMD will go about it their own way, without dedicated RT cores.

>AMD will go about it their own way, without dedicated RT cores.
That's wrong though. Yeah it wont be RT cores since that's nvidia propietary shit like cuda cores but it will have some hardware in there dedicated for raytracing but theyre taking a semi approach. Mostly because AMD cards are already compute beasts compared to nvidia cards so they don't need to tack on much dedicated hardware just for raytracing.

Ho shit, that's right, that's a custom shader mod. Forgot about that. I mean, it's still good,k but I guess it doesn't count since it's not official, that right.

Still though, there's a bunch of game that makes use of RTX and it's a nice visual improvement. It's just that it it's really scene-dependent.

>pc race shits on 4k upscaled
>cooming over rt upscaled

On a sidenote, anybody here using AMD cards? My 580 is doing ... something lately. My picture is kinda crisper, more refined. Not just sharper, like, I've been using RIS for a while. I'm on driver version 20.4.2. Anybody noticed anything?