What do you have to say to one of the best RPGs in the past decade?

is Div OS 2 hiding behind Tyranny?

The fuck nigga? Just hit shit with your sword

i liked it cant wait for bg3

Attached: 35b0664b4b1190f82fdcb8a8f221.jpg (1024x1024, 502.48K)

Better games for twitch magic play. Good cRPG needs narrative context.

Jog out of this thread.

The narrative context is to bully nerds like you with magic.

Of course not, why do you think the other anons are dodging the question?

Actually, you can side with Kyros, its just very, very annoying and hard to do.

Ignoring the fact every other character is stronk womyn, the magic system is too dependent on randomly finding or buying shit and the game just falls to pieces near the end. Like all rtwp shit most of the difficulty comes from having so many consecutive boring encounters that you let autoresolve take the wheel and jank you to death

aren't there only 2 strong women, other women are pretty much just cattle
also Kyros is implied to maybe be a woman

yikes

I wish they didn't rush the ending.

RPGs suck so I guess I would say OK.

Go loiter on a construction site.

It's all so tiresome. The entire point of fantasy as a genre is as a line of flight from liberal modernity, to escape into a pre-liberal medieval world. The magic circle is broken once you import liberal ideas of rights, freedom, and contracts as the basis for a social order, all you have left is a mirror to modernity rather than as escape, modernity in a silly costume, to do everything you do now and live how you live now but playing dressups. A total waste of what the genre is for: escapism into a pre-modern pre-liberal world unchecked by the progress of history or limits of reality.

Boring as shit

both. and very well written at that.

The rebels fucking hate you and only give you the time of the day because it's their cultural custom to parley to find out the status of prisoners and fallen soldiers you obviously butchered. It's entirely up to your initiative to join them.

And if you don't, how much iron but fair first or cartoon villain tyrannical your behavior is depends entirely on you.

Only bad thing is that the late game doesn't let you befriend the evil tyrants you actually like there's a hard cap on bosses you can befriend / beat into submission and some are mutually exclusive

You can even go full retard and get an ending where you successfully antagonize virtually every party in the game.

And all the characters are greatly written and consistent, maybe except for one.

Only real shame is the rushed, railroading ending.

being pro or against kyros is literally endgame choice. Kyros set you up

kyros is a chick and every archon has a laugh at your expense if you ask the question.

>stronk womyn

outside the psycopath, what strong women?

>old hag waterbender that's very clearly a sleazebag who is only alive because she can cast ice lances
>literal 15 years old pstd that gets cocky every time and gets sexually bullied by the old hag
>literal furry

>pre liberal world

lmao what kind of retard has this ideas. the fathers of liberal through were all pre-industrial medieval intellectuals.

>25 posts in
>nobody has named the ACTUAL best RPG of the decade
Tyranny was good though, I'll admit.

Attached: discoe.png (274x194, 62.88K)

that's not underrail

>fantasy has to be "pre-liberal medieval."
but why

>an entire genre is restricted from having certain themes so I can maintain my personal fantasy
Why should authors restrict themselves based on your garbage assumptions?

also 90% of fantansy has been ironic "it's the modern world but with elves!" stuff since since shadowrun, discworld and first wave of dungeon crawlers happened

True High Fantasy only made a comeback with LotR movies and videogames in the mid 2000s. And it's not like it has a lot of content outside of the witcher and few select franchises. Everything else has been ironic relatable fantasy

yikes
disofags always show up uninvited and unwanted

Because pre-liberalism is essential to the fantasy genre as a line of flight from liberal modernity. Without pre-liberalism it's just dressups, modernity in a funny costume, empty schlop. If you want magical liberalism then do sci-fi or some future oriented genre setting that exists in a temporally post-liberal world. Fantasy is necessarily an escape from modernity to past medivalism and must be free from liberalism if it is to be fantasy in any sense beyond mere costumes.

again,you clearly have never browsed /tg/, played a tabletop, read fantasy or interacted with fantasy fans from the last 30 years

Immersive fantasy isn't just niche, it's downright retro.