What an amazing game

>MAYBEEEEEEE

Attached: 6D58DAA4-4290-44CE-A8EC-060B94964656.gif (500x372, 953.16K)

is that all you had to say about it

Attached: smug shite.png (1000x563, 571.35K)

What else can be said? It's a fantastic game.

What do you want me to say?
It’s a really unique experience. Soundtrack is 10/10 and the landscapes really draw you in.
The only real criticisms I have of it are the random crits and there’s not many quests due to a lot being cut.

Overseer did nothing wrong.

>namefag
better to have just not say anything than what you just said.

Attached: 1587229363295.jpg (799x712, 54.27K)

4 is unironically better

Attached: 1472883056423.png (448x468, 194.26K)

It seemed sensible at the time
Then 2 made him an asshole

Not backpeddling but thats exactly what I wanted to hear

Attached: longthh.png (290x1208, 60.47K)

I mean...
>Story is more complex and has deeper themes. For example, a journalist seeking to uncover a sinister infiltrator in her town and the city being consumed by paranoia is a lot better than just “mayor vs casino boss lol”
You have a lot more incentive to find your son rather than the chip.

nigga shut up you aint fooling nobody
your quest in 1 literally comes down to "you're a martyr we send out to potentially die for us so we may live" then ur like "OMG MY SON FROM 100 YEARS AGO WHO OBVI IS STILLL ALIVE"

who are you quoting?

Fallout 1 is written more realistically, it has a down-to-earth style and tone, and it takes itself and it's material seriously. It's a game that meant something other than billions of dollars to the people who made it.

Fallout 4 does not treat it's subject matter seriously, the whole game is like one big joke. The holes in the plot are too numerous even to list. The world, while full of physical objects, is vapid when it comes to conceptual exploration.
In fallout 1, I'm interested in the world. i like talking to people, and learning about how this world works and how people live in it. It's far from perfect, but good post-apocalyptic games (fallout 1, NV, Wasteland 2) give a shit about the world building and try to make it grounded and interesting.
Nothing at all like that in Fallout 4. the world is 95% raiders, and there are like 10 guys digging around in the dirt. Nothing in the game makes any sense. Why do people allow Nick Valentine into that stupid city? Why does everyone know dogmeats name, even if you skip the part where that old woman names her? What is the institute doing, and why? Since when did Arthur maxon and the BoS start believing in "souls?" I could ask question upon question that the game makes no attempt to answer nor to deflect. It's written by like, a fucking caveman.

why

Please stop.

Tried Fallout 1.
I found out I don't like point and click games. Movement is friggin ponderous.

You're gonna be the one that saves me?

>double clicking and moving the camera is too hard for him
Look at this fag and laugh

Sounds like someone got filtered

Other guy but the game aged like shit. OG X-Com is far better for movement and combat and it came out far earlier

If you want to believe it was to complicated for my tiny brain instead of tedious nature of it you have my permission.
If it makes you feel better about yourself it costs me nothing so have at it.

>Why do people allow Nick Valentine into that stupid city?
You'd know if you asked him about it.
>Why does everyone know dogmeats name, even if you skip the part where that old woman names her?
You'd know if you asked anyone else about dogmeat.

Yeah I know the given "explanation" in the game, the problem is that is makes no sense and is internally inconsistent.

What?

Attached: 3 horsemen of the apocalyps.jpg (1280x720, 279.25K)

>time limit
game discarded

It’s easy to get the chip unless you’re retarded

>f4
Newer game, but isnt a fallout in any way
>f1
great rpg, great quest, Original.

doesn't matter, i like to look at shit and explore everything.