Was it autism?

Nah, cat-fags have some faulty mutagenes that intensify their emotions instead of weakening them that's why they're prone to throwing autistic fits

sure, but if you have a gun and your assailants are trying to jump you with bare fists killing them all is still kind of a dick move

Attached: 1588713476853.png (635x767, 653.77K)

they didn't do anything to stop the village's plan to rip him off and kill him did they? fuckers would've been happy to stand by idly as the hero of the village was slaughtered. got what they deserved

as is trying to kill me
we're even now

objectively morality is futile in the world where witcher takes place. guy did what he had to do to survive

The fuck were women and children supposed to do about it you nigger? If they even knew in the first place

would it be fair if villagers killed him? no
was it fair that he killed those villagers that didnt try to kill him? no
but that is what life is

trying to kill somebody is a considerably less of a dick move than actually doing it tho
guy, they were under no obligation to betray everyone they knew for a freaky stranger
just as you dont jail everybody who doesnt act when witnessing a car crash, you dont kill bystanders in a stickup

if they didn't know, sucks to suck i guess not much you can do there
if they did know at least they could've had the foresight to get the fuck out of the village before trying to kill what is commonly referred to as a "walking killing machine without feelings"

And that's why this is a futile argument.

What is some woman in a shack gonna do about it

They stabbed him in the chest repeatedly with pitchforks, then left him for dead. He drank a potion and then proceeded to slaughter the entire town.

The moral decision comes from the fact he murdered the children to prevent future retaliation and any witnesses. Those townsfolk knew what was going to happen, because there was a meeting over how they were going to afford a Witcher commission.

Attached: Is you serious.jpg (1024x538, 48.83K)

The point is he was in the wrong you mongoloid, stay on topic

no he was ANGERY

yeah
yeah you're right
still ended up letting him go every playthrough

This isn't the apocalypse or some shit dude. There is a tavern on every street with NPC's carrying 20 tons of bread and beer. Dude was a murderer.

ok but the withers are travelers, he could just go somewhere else
maybe if he was feeling particularly vengeful he could have fucked up the ones who wronged him specifically and rob them for what he was owed
but game ending everybody is an overkill
besides, coming back for revenge is not self defence

He killed an incredibly deadly monster for a village of bumpkins who were already planning on ripping him off, and killing him if necessary.
If people are so well off, why didn't they just pay him in the first place?

But it literally is an apocalypse.
Humans are post-apocalypse creatures in this world.

Yeah the first thing I would think if I was being beaten to death is that it would be unfair if I used the gun I happened to have on me in self-defence

Attached: 562.jpg (600x600, 67K)

He likes lolis

if the gun in question is a superhuman body you most likely can disengage and avoid killing
yeah, its not very satisfying but its the right thing to do

>don't kill the kids
>they grow up with revenge in their hearts and 20 years later you have Conans coming after your head
he did nothing wrong.