rate it
Rate it
im not qualified to rate it because i only played about an hour of it before i dropped it
why?
i hated how geralt controlled, very sluggish, like steering a boat.
and i thought, if i hate this very basic, core aspect of the game im probly not gonna enjoy playing it very much. so i stopped
also i dont care much for story and character development over gameplay
Solid 8. 9 if you include the expansions
Average, it's reminds me of Assassin's Creed III in a lot of ways. The high production value is the only thing stopping it from being worse.
9/10. I didn't mind the combat, I actually liked it, the graphics are beautiful and too good for 2015, like, way too good. The fact that it looks better than Vampire Masquerade which iscoming out basically in 2021 is embarrassing.
The DLCs are exrtemely good, side quests are extremely good (if pathetic boring tracking).
The only problems I have with the game is how awful of a protagonist Gearlt is. I know he's likethat in the book, it's not CDPR doing or anything like that, I just don't like Geralt at all.
A 100 years old creep who's a feminist, not racist, respects women even though he treats them as sex objects, is some sort of chosen one known by EVERYONE, Mary Sue piece of shit that mixes attractive, immortal, super skilled, etc etc.
There seriously can't be a more unlikable protagonist than Geralt, "It's current year, women don't go to universities to get a husband", ugh, fuck you Geralt. Nothing I hate more than protagonists acting 2020 when they live in a historically accurate past. Kingdom Come had THE SAME problem with Henry being a feminist and LGBT friendly.
4/10 and that's being generous
8/10 overall
the combat is too floaty. Some of the side quest stories are 10/10 though
8/10
Great characters, nice side quests,some great main quest quests, anything involving Ciri was almost insufferable the main plot was shit, the overworld was a bloated mess with useless points if interests that were just leveled loot. Skellige was visually and musically beautiful though.
9/10 first playthrough
6/10 second playthrough
Anybody who claims their was nothing to see in the world either didn't actually explore it or just decided that Skellige's ocean represents everything there is to see
9 out of 5
Depends on what you are looking for. If you were expecting Bloodborne then 3/10 but if you wanted an RPG its like a 9/10. And considering how TW3 is the third game in an established RPG series anons are foolish for being so butthurt that the combat wasn't a priority for CDPR, whose two previous games had even worse combat.
Its okay but Tiger Woods PGA tour 12 is better
4/10
>combat system and MMO style monsters is aids
>constantly needing to replace gear
>inventory capacity
>qwent
>boring story until hours into the game
>supporting systems like alchemy feels underdeveloped
>map markers everywhere
pros
>nice enviroment
>in game porn
10/10 GOAT
>MMO style monsters is aids
What?
>constantly needing to replace gear
Did you not get witcher school gear?
>inventory capacity
EXTREMELY easy to manage
>Gwent
Gwent is fucking great
>boring story until hours into the game
Bloody Baron isn't even 4 hours into the game
easily 10/10, beat it on PS4 and PC with mods
you can use an 'arcade' control set to make geralt move better than the wannabe realism they used
it's as good if not better than breath of the wild
*****
it's shit. Literally ruined western games for me.
>Immediately shitty and unsatisfying combat that I feel like I have no actual control over
>Wanna give them credit for trying to add something to it with Geralt's gypsy magic but they failed spectacularly
>Over-Encumbrance SLOWS YOU TO A FUCKING CRAWL for fucking what exactly? HOO HOO HOO POOR LIL GUY CAN'T CARRY INFINITE SWORDS but it takes like a dozen turkey legs to restore your HP fully?
>your HP restores FUCKING INCREMENTALLY on top of this
>Other trash mechanics that only clueless devs like such as weapon durability and layered crafting are also present
>Dialog is basically "DIRTY WITCHER! WE DUN LIKE YER KIND AROUND HERE! GO ON AN GIT!"
>Don't even care if it turns into something more than that later because no fucking way am I putting up with this shit until then
>oh, did you figure out the first sidequest without having to use Batman vision? Whoops, it's bugged and you can't finish it now, fuck you
>first time I played this shit was THREE GODDAMN YEARS after it came out and it was STILL BUGGED - legends say it still is
>thinks the bloody baron was good
Despise the actual gameplay but love the narrative
8/10.
I liked it at first. A lot of potential. But the whole thing barely ever scratches that potential and by the time you explore even half the world you are stupidly overpowered. It destroys its own immersion. Especially since by this 3rd game Geralt is literally famous around the world.
None of it really adds up into a satisfying way. Fantastic soundtrack though.
Wind's howling/5
someone post the pasta
you know the one
Because it is you fucking contrarian
Best game ever
Only complaint is the DLC.
HoS hinted that next DLC would send you to far away lands. Then Blood and Wine got released and it was high-fantasy eurojank province with obnoxious wine faggotry.
7/10 or 8/10
main quest was shit, expansions were great, combat is about as broken as any other open world game (not skyrim tier broken though)
10/10
But the DLC is the best part, user
No dual-wield dagger assassin class/10
No hot beastmen to have sex with/10
Otherwise nice visuals and quests
7/10
100 years of travelling across the world through muck and shit tends to strip you of prejudice. Racism and et cetera are behavioral memes for very bored people.
He's so famed because Dandelion won't stop sperging over him in royal courts, towns and hamlets with his very flattering ballads.
You're right about Henry in Kingdom Come, though. But don't construe Geralt as being the *very* same. Stop being 17.