Show me a $400 PC that can run next-gen Unreal Engine games smoothly. I'll wait.
Show me a $400 PC that can run next-gen Unreal Engine games smoothly. I'll wait
Other urls found in this thread:
techpowerup.com
twitter.com
>MUH SSD
Show me a $1000 pc that will run bloodborne. I'll wait.
show me a sohnigger that actually owns a console that runs next-gen unreal
@508521895
Show me a $400 console that can run next-gen Unreal Engine games smoothly. I'll wait
I can't because all I care about is league of legends like the pc neckbeard virgin fucking loser that I am and act like im a gamer
Ps2 > ps3 > ps4
There are like 3 good games for the ps4, it is a glorified freudflix machine.
Show me a console that runs the Unreal 5 Demo at 60fps. I'll wait.
>PS5, $400
Show me an unreal engine game that isn't total dog shit
>PS5
>Smoothly
this im also a pc neckbeard loser but i play dota all day and act like i like video games
>b-but but what about this demo???
Show me a $400 console that can run next-gen Unreal Engine games smoothly. I'll wait.
I've owned every single Playstation alongside a high end PC and this is honestly the first generation of Playstation I'm seriously considering not getting. The PS4 was a glorified Bloodborne machine for me until the FF7 Remake finally came out and even then I could have just waited for the inevitable PC release. Most of its exclusives are just incredibly boring and bland. As things are looking right now I'd rather just put the money towards an Ampere card instead of the PS5. I don't care if I pay more initially for PC as it's a vastly better experience.
Show me a PS5.
>pays 400-500 for console
>pays 400 to use own internet for 7 years
I'll show you a 900-1000 build that will absolutely assblast anything you've ever played in your pathetic life.
Why do console fags forget that they have to pay for Live and PSplus and include it in the cost when comparing to PC. Without those subscriptions they might as well have purchased a 500 dollar brick.
>30fps
>Smoothly
The only reason to buy a console
I mean because it's cheap
Pcs are $$$
We don't know if it's going to be 400 dollars. Knowing Sony it'll be 499 or maybe even higher.
>Why do console fags forget
Most don't have the mental capacity to open up a PC, much less tinkle with it.
>could build great PC for around 800 bucks
>Buys 400 dollar console and defends paying for PSplus
Don't also forget the "Pro" or "X" version that comes out a few years later that so many will pay full price for it a second time and only be able to resell their used original model for a mere fraction of what they paid for it.
>games are cheaper
>free online
Not on the long run. And I didn't take into account pirating the games.
woah so it's like buying a new $800 video card every 2 years?
The biggest downside to playing on console, is you're forced to use the test monkey pellet feeding device.
This. The PS3 Slim after the price drop was a legitimately good deal on a console. Relatively cheap and you got free online with it. No more payments needed. This gen has been a shitshow. Paid online ruins all the savings you could have had by purchasing a console. At this point these is zero reason outside of exclusives to ever go with a console anymore.
My 5 year old card can still play multiplats better than any console.
Don't overstimate the need to upgrade a PC with console tech moving at glacial pace.
There will probably be phones that can outperform PS5 by the time that gen is done.
800 bucks won't even give you half the specs of the ps5
cope
>smoothly
haha oh wow.
Pretty sure this one can and I'd say it can be built for around that. Even if it's a little bit more, it still can play EVERY GAME MADE BEFORE NEXT YEAR AND EVERY GAME AFTER IT so it's infinitely better no matter what.
>Next gen will be equivalent to an RTX 2060S/RX 5700
>GPUs from ~2 years prior
apparently that's their target for unreal 5 on consoles next year when it releases
>a laptop card is more powerful than the PS5
Embarrasing.
All console components are essentially laptop parts
>notebook 2080 is same as 2070 super
lol I dont think so Tim
PCs cant even run it at that. They said their target is 60 meaning they haven't reached it.
they pretty much have to be due to the form factor for power/cooling
Snoytards SEETHING from the day long raping they've been getting
Ever heard of the Q-max?
>$400
A laptop gpu equal to a 2060 outperformed the ps5.
Ps5 is on par with a 3 year old gtx 1070.
LMAO
yeah is he retarded? I thought digital foundry guys were knowledgeable
"PCs" are not a fixed hardware bro.
And the question is not if they will run it, but when (and paying how much, but hey, early adopters)
SHUT UP THE POWER OF THE SSD WILL MAKE IT BETTER THAN YOUR 1000000000 COMPUTER!!!
2080 notebook is equivellant to 2070 super
I wonder if the new lighting dynamics will be able to fix mirrors once and for all.
maybe they should've shown off something with better performance then. As of now 40 is the best we've seen. (if you can even trust that)
40fps on an unknown development build from a chinese source while the same source says they're aiming to have it at 60fps on consoles when it releases next year, suggesting if the source is reliable then the engine isn't very optimized yet
>Doesn't know that laptop GPUs have their own Q-Max sku's that are under powered for thermal protections.
It's showing you how a laptop can run it as well. Dipshit.
They plan on using the engine for the ps4, xbone and switch as well.
No it's fucking not that's an expensive as fuck laptop.
>techpowerup.com
>2080ti is only 26% faster than that laptop GPU
>$400
Price isn't even announced yet retard
Define smootly
Console smooth at a solid 24 fps stable?