He bought AMD for gaming

>cores
>video games
found the fat fucking retard

>1080p/1440p
stop being poor

>he bought AMD for gaming

Attached: 1546012056388.png (501x586, 94.62K)

i think so. amd is for people like me. intel is for people with too much money

>you already made this thread a few hours ago
madmins won't let me post wojak so use your imagination

>intel is a must goyim
>it doesnt matter if your paying $400 more for only a +2 fps difference
>you need intel

Attached: 1590073539031.jpg (953x1024, 69.29K)

>that much extra head and power draw for a few more frames

when will children grow up and use 16:10

>you cant even talk about a game more than once a week or else you'd be considered pathetic
if you dont like the threads, dont click on them

Attached: 1538247469963.png (1280x1122, 189.24K)

>few more frames
>literally a 30+- difference

How come the new and more expensive cpu is slower than the older one?

Attached: 1403475165276.jpg (500x335, 42.86K)

>implying theres a difference between 60fps and anything above 60fps
you cannot tell the difference. dont lie to yourself

>i-its just a few more f-f-frames
>l-l-literally a difference of tw-two fps!!
theres a difference of ~30fps

Yeah, at 1080p
Only a dumb nigger would play at anything that low, like (You)

see Going above 60fps nets you nothing. Games feel exactly the same at 60fps and 120fps

Now compare the price differential and wattage/thermal between an i9 9900K and a 3700X kek

I assume you're cherry picking hard.
youtube.com/watch?v=_j56hMgZNHU
According to this it's about 10 FPS more on average.
Which is good if you want top of the line, but it is also an extra 100 dollars.
Zen 3 probably releases later this year and we can see how that compares then.

Attached: thisisb8.gif (300x252, 2.79M)

oh good, it's just CPUs. glad I have my AMD GPU that was second-best price:perf.

>at 1080p
kek

How'd you get numbers this low using the 3700x? Im using it with a worse gpu at 1080p running everything in metro exodus at max settings with 100+ fps average

I'm quite excited at what Zen 3 is going to achieve. I'm only sad it'll require an AM5 series board as a minimum.

>I'm only sad it'll require an AM5 series board as a minimum.
It won't.

>intelaviv
nice one OP
how's the housefires?

Attached: 1589998051728.png (650x490, 91.23K)

thought it was just a x500 series board requirment?

It's literally a flat % fps increase from the clock speed difference.
You're paying hundreds of dollars for the same silicon just tuned up to run at 80°C.
Also this clock speed gap could be gone in 2 months, anyone with a brain would wait-and-see.

>i5
my condolences, im the i7 chad

>1080p on a $1200 videocard

Oy vey rabbi, I will go and buy a brand new socket MB for 250$ and a 700$ CPU that only works with water cooling right away!

Attached: 24234.jpg (1080x1080, 196.78K)

what the fuck happened to cpus now a days? I remember you buy a i5 4670k and that lasts for a looong time. Now it's OMG BROS YOU HAVE TO UPGRADE FROM ZEN 1 -> ZEN 2 -> ZEN 3
WOW YOU'RE STILL ON RYZEN ZEN 1 AHAHAHAHA, WOW LOL

I'm so confused, is there that much of a performance difference?

Many b450 and x470 boards should also support zen 3.

Technology changed. We're hitting an exponential growth. Zen 1 vs Zen 2 is a huge difference performance wise. CPUs with half the cores and clock speeds on zen 2 vastly outperform what should be the superior cpu with zen 1. Zen 3 looking pretty hype

You're paying like $150-300 again for a 10fps increase.
I don't know if that's worth it.

wewh. guess I didnt need to upgrade then. Just went from a b450 to an x570 a month ago

I use an i5 9400f and 1660ti, I'm content.

Not at release, at least for me. Im pretty poor. Still using zen 1. But with zen 3's release, all zen 2 cpus will be have their prices cut. So win win