Can game reviews be trusted anymore?
Can game reviews be trusted anymore?
Don't worry so much about games. Worry about when people decide to start killing journalists.
Consider that people too stupid to do anything else become journalists and people too stupid to become real journalists become game journalists.
Fuck reviews.
Dude we stopped trusting reviews 12 years ago
Why follow game reviews? They only made sense back in the 80s/90s when print magazines were our primary source of info for new releases. Now you have online videos and streaming LPs for everything. You can easily make your own judgments rather than getting your opinions from an online personality.
>6 years of crying on Zig Forums
>still lost the culture war
You know that doing what you're doing does nothing but lead people into more radicalization?
You can't even trust the news anymore looking at what happened with this coronavirus scam and you want to trust game reviews?
no matter what happens you fags are going to keep seething since anger and hatred is the only thing that excites your fried dopamine receptors anymore, if not me you'll just find some other literally who twitter random to cry about
Why are you even here tranny?
Nah
Is this the amerimutts thread?
>sites nobody heard of
Is that parody account? Bait account? They have a Keanu Chungus and trans flag profile pic.
When did they join? Why did you screenshot this tweet?
to discuss video games, which is more than Zig Forumsfaggots only here to recruit more disaffected autists to their cult can say
It’s sarcasm
Nah that’s two blocks down, and take a right.
Do you need a review to decide what kind of songs you like?
No? Then you dont need one for games either
>when people decide to start killing journalists
You have to be retarded to think Mario & Zelda games haven’t recieved paid reviews over the last decade. XBX is better than BOTW in every way but was rated 10 points lower because of the lack of paid scores
>Is that parody account? Bait account?
god you people are fucking stupid
Video games have objective review components. Visual fidelity among ports, framerate/performance, bugs, etc. Not all platforms are equal. Ideally this is where reviews would focus, instead of the same copy/paste subjective reviews that are always written: "the graphics are good...and I liked the story....I give it an arbitrary number out of 10."
If you are somewhat famous, why would you want to have a public account in a forum anyway? I work in Capcom and I used to have accounts in several forums back in the day. I never revealed my identity, that would be a very stupid thing to do
Journalism pretty much died once the 24 hour news cycle became a thing
Tell Capcom to remake outbreak you FUCK. REsistance sucks.
Do you think Journos should decide if devs should be denied bonus pay or potential newcomer talent get gatekeeped because the lack of a feminine dick?
Even back then you could'nt trust them
Being famous is desirable to narcissists, despite its dangers.
Yes you could because each game had 120 reviews, Nintendo games, Halo, Resident Evil & Rockstar games usually had 170
more and more it seems like the NeoGAF fiasco was a power play hidden in plain sight.
It's sarcasm. Whenever Resetera's influence and its members are brought up, many people, even Zig Forumstards will immediately say some shit like "lol it's just a bunch of no-name sites who cares?"
What was the neogaf fiasco again?