This is debatable better then the first one

this is debatable better then the first one

Attached: l3.jpg (1000x1619, 893.83K)

The animation quality is top-notch but I still remember enjoying the first more.
It could also be the fact that I was a kid; that probably helped.

i wish gems and boos did something more than skins

it easily is. only subhuman gamecube babbies believe otherwise

It's too long, and the music is nowhere near as good as 1 which was one of the best parts of that game.

i agree, but both are extremely worthwhile games with different strengths

They're completely different games at this point honestly. LM3 did take a hint from the 1st game but still very much shows that it doesnt strive to be anything like the 1st game, for better or for worse.
The 1st game is almost an arcade-y experience, or at least wanted to be, but didn't get as much done because it had to release as a Gamecube release title, so it's more linear than it should be and doesnt have much depth to it, but it & its beta show the premise for these ideas, which LM2 & 3 dropped altogether.

Never got to play the first, but it's pretty boring.

All 3 games are unironically the same level of quality. Whether you think that's good or bad is irrelevant. I don't wanna hear shit about it either as I played all the games back to back to get ready for LM3.

You're debatable more retarded thabv j flaccid curk ofwuw

>retarded thabv j flaccid curk ofwuw
what did he mean by this?

Holy based

RIP

Literally nostalgia goggles. The most potent form of delusion there is.

I don't know why but Luigi opening doors in the 1st game is still really impressive to me

What the fuck did he mean to say with flaccid

Would be a pretty interesting debate
Id take atmosphere and a shorter game over a lot of content that is mostly repetition and almost complete lack of good atmosphere because of the floors feeling like not connected generic levels

Gamecubebabbies, everyone

It's not bad by any means but I still liked the first one more, and there's a few floors in 3 that are too similar to 2 for my liking.

The first one isn't even particularly good in the first place, it's basically a glorified tech demo.

Gamecubefags are officially retarded.

Nah 1>3>2. Tbh Luigi's Mansion only really had one game in the series, both 2 and 3 are far removed from 1

Only bad parts are the music and the castle floors, the rest are from good to great.

Just finished this game and came to Zig Forums thanks for this thread.

I really enjoyed it, I played most of it with my kid. She's 5 years old and really enjoyed it too. She wants to play again from the beginning. She mostly didn't do much, and when she was scared she would ask me to play alone while she watches.

I'm glad she's beginning to like to play video games like her father. Some day I will give her my whole game collection.

I'm contributing nothing to this thread. I just wanted to use this image again.

Attached: 1573016714398.png (1200x1200, 2.33M)

3>2>1

Lowkey based

I don't know why people love the first one so much. It's like 2 hours long.

I loved the puzzle aspects of LM3. I hope they expand upon and double down on that aspect for LM4.
Also LM4 when? I want it.

Flaccid

Based image-spam poster.

Attached: chokeposting luigi ghost sucked.jpg (1266x688, 148.49K)

this game is soulless as fuck but the scarescraper mode is very good. The single player is 100% worse then Luigi's Mansion 1. Anyone who disagrees hasn't played games for very long.

Nope
3>2>1
Shithead

It’s equal to the original where they both have positives and negatives that counter each other out.

They both sit right next to each other as great games.

>gckid
>talking about playing for "very long"
lol